#DFG: Canceling the Noise

Is there any level of suspension that you would advise Tom to accept?


  • Total voters
    208

TomRicardo

rusty cohlebone
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2006
20,775
Row 14
Ed Hillel said:
I know we don't want to go down the rabbit hole, and obviously this guy is biased, but he is also fairly well-respected from what I can tell:
 
https://twitter.com/PatriotsSB49/status/560193573917061120
 
Imagine if the Pats have tape of this and are just letting the NFL do its thing.
 
Fairly respected how so?  The account only existed for a couple of days
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,999
Maine

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,639
LuckyBen said:
Lol, 35 degree difference...
 
His new result still isn't factoring in potential inaccuracy in gauge(s), observer error in reading same, and loss of air in measurement process. On top of that is the "excitation" from ball prep that BB discussed on Saturday.  
 

OnWisc

Microcosmic
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2006
7,070
Chicago, IL
But I've never wanted something to be true as badly as this.
Have you learned nothing from the media this week? If you want it to be true, just act like it is, and refuse to process any information that comes out to the contrary.
 

Bone Chips

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2009
736
South Windsor, CT
kartvelo said:
Not much of  a retraction. He still says the balls had to be inflated at 90F.
Which still implies he thinks BB is full of shit.
and there is no conceivable prep process (I'm thinking of mechanical buffing) that couldn't raise the air temperature from 75 degrees to 90?
 

LuckyBen

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 5, 2012
3,396
OnWisc said:
Have you learned nothing from the media this week? If you want to be true, just act like it is, and refuse to process any information that comes out to the contrary.
My guess is exactly what the Twitter account was going for
 

kartvelo

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2003
10,498
At home
Bone Chips said:
and there is no conceivable prep process (I'm thinking of mechanical buffing) that couldn't raise the air temperature from 75 degrees to 90?
SumnerH's calculations don't require it.
 
Edit: Besides, it doesn't matter. We all know the refs never measured the balls pre-game, so despite the fact that the science is on the Pats' side, it's irrelevant.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,518
Here
Harry Hooper said:
 
 
I'd love it to mean more, but it just may be his a) looking at the INT ball when the Colts complained and/or b) squeezing the Colts balls for quick comparison.
 
I'm more interested in whether the guy was on the sidelines at all. That would strongly indicate to me it was a sting. If it was the first ever sting operation run by a league against one of its teams in the major sports...ever (?), it's hard not to believe the people in charge have a strong bias here. I don't think he'd fuck with them on the sidelines either, but I'm not sure I would trust any part of his involvement in the process. If, for example, the Colts balls actually didn't measure below 12.5, I'd like to know how that didn't happen unless they were either overinflated to begin with or someone fudged the numbers. They should have dropped below, given the conditions.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,571
Ed Hillel said:
I know we don't want to go down the rabbit hole, and obviously this guy is biased, but he is also fairly well-respected from what I can tell:
 
https://twitter.com/PatriotsSB49/status/560193573917061120
 
Imagine if the Pats have tape of this and are just letting the NFL do its thing.
 
Well, if Pats are still taking video of opposing sidelines during games....
 

Bone Chips

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2009
736
South Windsor, CT
Ed Hillel said:
I know we don't want to go down the rabbit hole, and obviously this guy is biased, but he is also fairly well-respected from what I can tell:
 

https://twitter.com/PatriotsSB49/status/560193573917061120
https://twitter.com/PatriotsSB49/status/560193573917061120

link to tweet
 
Imagine if the Pats have tape of this and are just letting the NFL do its thing.
Thornton just reported the exact same thing on EEI... "I have it on good authority"
 

SumnerH

Malt Liquor Picker
Dope
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
32,070
Alexandria, VA
Bone Chips said:
and there is no conceivable prep process (I'm thinking of mechanical buffing) that couldn't raise the air temperature from 75 degrees to 90?
Just holding it between your legs as you're rubbing the balls could get you near that realm, conceivably. Body heat + buffing.
 

kartvelo

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2003
10,498
At home
Ed Hillel said:
 
I'm more interested in whether the guy was on the sidelines at all. That would strongly indicate to me it was a sting. If it was the first ever sting operation run by a league against one of its teams in the major sports...ever (?), it's hard not to believe the people in charge have a strong bias here. I don't think he'd fuck with them on the sidelines either, but I'm not sure I would trust any part of his involvement in the process. If, for example, the Colts balls actually didn't measure below 12.5, I'd like to know how that didn't happen unless they were either overinflated to begin with or someone fudged the numbers. They should have dropped below, given the conditions.
Which is why the NDT non-retraction matters.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,999
Maine
Perhaps the Patriots are starting to fight fire with fire by "leaking" silly and unprovable rumors to select members of the "media"?
 
Or more likely, a group of so-called media is conspiring to see how widespread an outrageous rumor that implicates something other than "the Patriots DID IT!" can get.
 

kartvelo

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2003
10,498
At home
If it was a "sting," I'm inclined to think it was a "sting" run by someone like Kensil operating on his own, under the aegis of "league official." He knows Brady like low-range footballs, he knows the refs never check, maybe he even remember HS science, and he hates BB. So he decides to fuck with him and Brady by challenging the balls' inflation. As I've said before, it's just like asking the ump to check the glove/cap/uniform of a pitcher who's kicking your ass in hopes of throwing him off his game. When the refs just inflated the balls and didn't even mention anything to the Pats, the "stinger" must have been furious and got the word out through a different channel to try and discredit the Pats - never dreaming how successful he'd be.
 
Then he continued, as "an unnamed league official," to spew false or misleading leaks all week long, loving every moment of it.
 
Edit: That is, not a formal sting run or sanctioned by the NFL. Which puts the league in a very difficult position and could account for the way they've behaved this week. At this point I'm thinking (hoping?) I might enjoy the eventual findings.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Well, if Pats are still taking video of opposing sidelines during games....
All is fair after Sunday night. Before then, be smart but cautious.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,639
PedroKsBambino said:
 
Well, if Pats are still taking video of opposing sidelines during games....
 
 
Funny, but don't worry, the lighthouse observation deck has a roof on it.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Thornton just reported the exact same thing on EEI... "I have it on good authority"
Somebody should feed it to Florio, along with the Kensil background. Instant ignition.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,052
Unreal America
dcmissle said:
Darren Rovell was on DC sports radio this morning. He said the NFL gets not a penny if the ratings are goosed. And because the ratings are always so high for the SB, the NFL is never in the position, or close to it, or being on the hook for give-backs to advertisers.

This makes no sense even in the short term, essentially desecrating the signature event in the sport after a crummy PR year.
The Will Leitch piece was beautifully written, but the conclusion is specious.
 
The NFL has already been paid for Super Bowl 49 by NBC in it's rights deal to carry regular season and playoff games.  Just as the NFL is already paid for the next several Super Bowls by CBS, FOX and NBC as well.  The TV networks control all of the ad inventory in the pre-game, game, and post-game.  The league does not see a dime of that revenue, nor would they see any incremental moneyt from the ratings for any Super Bowl being higher due to increased interest.
 
 Basically Leitch is concluding that the NFL is not just allowing, but encouraging, this circus to continue for some non-quantifiable, indirect financial benefit.  
 
Sometimes the explanation is simple... the NFL is poorly run when it comes to anything aside from TV rights negotiations, marketing, or product licensing.  The NFL has excellent business operations, but terrible "game operations", so to speak.
 

kartvelo

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2003
10,498
At home
I don't see how Kensil could have physically affected the Pats' balls if he was "seen prowling" the Colts sideline.
 
Well, except for the Jackson interception ball.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,999
Maine
kartvelo said:
I don't see how Kensil could have physically affected the Pats' balls if he was "seen prowling" the Colts sideline.
 
Well, except for the Jackson interception ball.
 
Don't you see?  He wasn't deflating Pats' balls, he was inflating Colts' balls so they were able to "magically" defy the laws of physics.
 

finnVT

superspreadsheeter
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2002
2,154
8slim said:
The Will Leitch piece was beautifully written, but the conclusion is specious.
 
The NFL has already been paid for Super Bowl 49 by NBC in it's rights deal to carry regular season and playoff games.  Just as the NFL is already paid for the next several Super Bowls by CBS, FOX and NBC as well.  The TV networks control all of the ad inventory in the pre-game, game, and post-game.  The league does not see a dime of that revenue, nor would they see any incremental moneyt from the ratings for any Super Bowl being higher due to increased interest.
 
 Basically Leitch is concluding that the NFL is not just allowing, but encouraging, this circus to continue for some non-quantifiable, indirect financial benefit.  
 
Sometimes the explanation is simple... the NFL is poorly run when it comes to anything aside from TV rights negotiations, marketing, or product licensing.  The NFL has excellent business operations, but terrible "game operations", so to speak.
Wouldn't the ratings of this super bowl have a direct, quantifiable effect on how much they can sell super bowl rights for next time?  (I *really* don't think this is the answer, regardless)
 

RememberTheGronkans

New Member
Jan 26, 2015
31
Bone Chips said:
Thornton just reported the exact same thing on EEI... "I have it on good authority"
If this is true...

/tinfoil hat
Clearly, following the tampering charges filed against the Jets by the Patriots, owner Woody Johnson was upset. So he contacted former Jets official, who is now a VP in the NFL league office, and Colts' owner Jim Irsay, in order to discuss running a sting operation against the Patriots. 

The reason that the Wells investigation is taking so long is not that he is investigating the Patriots, but the Colts and Jets. 

In several weeks, he will reveal the sting operation performed by the Colts and the Jets, and the Patriots will be awarded their respective first round picks as compensation.
/tinfoil hat

I fucking wish. 
 
 

RetractableRoof

tolerates intolerance
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2003
3,836
Quincy, MA
kartvelo said:
I don't see how Kensil could have physically affected the Pats' balls if he was "seen prowling" the Colts sideline.
 
Well, except for the Jackson interception ball.
And yet under the same circumstances, the Pats managed to do it... to 12 balls. Can he prove he didn't do it? I think he should be suspended and removed from AZ for the duration of the SB.
 

theapportioner

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 9, 2006
5,075
RetractableRoof said:
And yet under the same circumstances, the Pats managed to do it... to 12 balls. Can he prove he didn't do it? I think he should be suspended and removed from AZ for the duration of the SB.
 
I think he should be suspended for the duration of his life.
 

Steve Dillard

wishes drew noticed him instead of sweet & sour
SoSH Member
Oct 7, 2003
5,989
PedroKsBambino said:
Well, if Pats are still taking video of opposing sidelines during games....
I think the opposite. If he's not on the video, then he will have a hard time proving that he didn't do it, because if you can't see what he's doing, he obviously was doing something bad.
 

simplyeric

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 14, 2006
14,037
Richmond, VA
kartvelo said:
King completely believes BB. Says a coach said BB would never be that strident if he was lying. Also says Brady is one of the most honorable people he knows. Extolling the virtues of his team-orientation.

Wants to see forensic proof and can't believe they will "come down with the hammer" unless there's some proof (a la Kraft).

Where the hell was ANY of this while the pitchforks were out for the last WEEK?
Great now we have people comparing BB to Martin Luther.
 

twibnotes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
20,409
8slim said:
Sometimes the explanation is simple... the NFL is poorly run when it comes to anything aside from TV rights negotiations, marketing, or product licensing.  The NFL has excellent business operations, but terrible "game operations", so to speak.
I met Eric Grubman years ago. He was/is basically the COO of the league, and he has a pretty impressive business background (partner at Goldman, sr position at constellation energy). He was clear that he has no say - at least at that time - in football ops, which he also seemed to acknowledge is the real juice.
 

theapportioner

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 9, 2006
5,075
I wonder if Kensil, Irsay, etc. will be as forthcoming with providing cell phone, email records to the Wells investigation as the Patriots have done.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,052
Unreal America
finnVT said:
Wouldn't the ratings of this super bowl have a direct, quantifiable effect on how much they can sell super bowl rights for next time?  (I *really* don't think this is the answer, regardless)
 
Eh, theoretically, sure.  But as I posted yesterday, Super Bowl ratings have been unfathomably consistent for 40 years.  And Super Bowl rights are locked in for the next 8 years.  Seems odd to be trying to move the rating marginally in 2015 in advance of rights that expire in 2023.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
25,052
Unreal America
twibnotes said:
I met Eric Grubman years ago. He was/is basically the COO of the league, and he has a pretty impressive business background (partner at Goldman, sr position at constellation energy). He was clear that he has no say - at least at that time - in football ops, which he also seemed to acknowledge is the real juice.
 
Correct.  
 
Like many here, I'm intimately familiar with the media industry and the NFL.  This isn't some concerted effort to boost interest and sell soda pop.
 

CSteinhardt

"Steiny"
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
3,203
Cambridge
DennyDoyle'sBoil said:
 
I do think so very much, because I think it would reinforce the concept that these are difficult matters and this is not a matter for reflexive thinking.  I agree that the crazies and haters don't care, but there is going to be a time when serious people debate this, even if they are the minority, and it would be nice if they understand the debate.
 
 
Fair enough - since several people [I quoted just this one for brevity] thought it would help, I let him know about the gauge/air pressure difference and I suspect he'll write something in the near future.  On a completely unrelated note, SoSH seems to have all sorts of messy problems on my mobile phone at the moment.
 

EL Jeffe

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 30, 2006
1,330
If Kensil was the NFL Ops guy who the Colts called mid-game because the intercepted ball felt low, isn't reasonable that he'd head over to the Colts sideline and inspect the ball before launching the investigation?

I mean, I get that the Patriots haven't been afforded the benefit of the doubt at any turn throughout this whole manufactured scandal, but still, this Kensil news is likely just him doing due dilligence. I can't see him tampering with footballs in front of 80,000 people.
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
62,356
8slim said:
 
Eh, theoretically, sure.  But as I posted yesterday, Super Bowl ratings have been unfathomably consistent for 40 years.  And Super Bowl rights are locked in for the next 8 years.  Seems odd to be trying to move the rating marginally in 2015 in advance of rights that expire in 2023.
Right, but the more people who watch the Super Bowl the more people the NFL can capture, which will increase regular season ratings, as well as ticket and merchandise sales.
 

nattysez

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2010
8,545
RedOctober3829 said:
Shocking as it may be on both individual's case, but Manish Mehta interviews Kurt Warner and Warner says DeflateGate raises his suspicions even more about the Patriots cheating to win the SB vs. his Rams.

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/kurt-warner-suspicious-patriots-deflategate-article-1.2094128
 
LOL BOO HOO.
 
EL Jeffe said:
If Kensil was the NFL Ops guy who the Colts called mid-game because the intercepted ball felt low, isn't reasonable that he'd head over to the Colts sideline and inspect the ball before launching the investigation?

I mean, I get that the Patriots haven't been afforded the benefit of the doubt at any turn throughout this whole manufactured scandal, but still, this Kensil news is likely just him doing due dilligence. I can't see him tampering with footballs in front of 80,000 people.
 
Yes.  I'm all for making this as ridiculous as possible, but the chances Kensil was just checking out the footballs to see if there appeared to be an obvious problem is are pretty good.