Lol, 35 degree difference...Peak Oil Can Boyd said:NGT retraction (kinda): https://www.facebook.com/notes/neil-degrasse-tyson/deflategate/10153074004496613
Lol, 35 degree difference...Peak Oil Can Boyd said:NGT retraction (kinda): https://www.facebook.com/notes/neil-degrasse-tyson/deflategate/10153074004496613
Peak Oil Can Boyd said:NGT retraction (kinda): https://www.facebook.com/notes/neil-degrasse-tyson/deflategate/10153074004496613
Peak Oil Can Boyd said:NGT retraction (kinda): https://www.facebook.com/notes/neil-degrasse-tyson/deflategate/10153074004496613
Ed Hillel said:I know we don't want to go down the rabbit hole, and obviously this guy is biased, but he is also fairly well-respected from what I can tell:
https://twitter.com/PatriotsSB49/status/560193573917061120
Imagine if the Pats have tape of this and are just letting the NFL do its thing.
Not much of a retraction. He still says the balls had to be inflated at 90F.Peak Oil Can Boyd said:NGT retraction (kinda): https://www.facebook.com/notes/neil-degrasse-tyson/deflategate/10153074004496613
TomRicardo said:
Fairly respected how so? The account only existed for a couple of days
Peak Oil Can Boyd said:NGT retraction (kinda): https://www.facebook.com/notes/neil-degrasse-tyson/deflategate/10153074004496613
LuckyBen said:Lol, 35 degree difference...
Have you learned nothing from the media this week? If you want it to be true, just act like it is, and refuse to process any information that comes out to the contrary.But I've never wanted something to be true as badly as this.
and there is no conceivable prep process (I'm thinking of mechanical buffing) that couldn't raise the air temperature from 75 degrees to 90?kartvelo said:Not much of a retraction. He still says the balls had to be inflated at 90F.
Which still implies he thinks BB is full of shit.
My guess is exactly what the Twitter account was going forOnWisc said:Have you learned nothing from the media this week? If you want to be true, just act like it is, and refuse to process any information that comes out to the contrary.
SumnerH's calculations don't require it.Bone Chips said:and there is no conceivable prep process (I'm thinking of mechanical buffing) that couldn't raise the air temperature from 75 degrees to 90?
rodderick said:
What? The PatriotsSB49 account has been active since June, 2012.
Harry Hooper said:
I'd love it to mean more, but it just may be his a) looking at the INT ball when the Colts complained and/or b) squeezing the Colts balls for quick comparison.
You can change your handle on Twitter, odds are he was once PatriotsSB47/48.TomRicardo said:
I just took an educated guess from the name. Think about it.
Ed Hillel said:I know we don't want to go down the rabbit hole, and obviously this guy is biased, but he is also fairly well-respected from what I can tell:
https://twitter.com/PatriotsSB49/status/560193573917061120
Imagine if the Pats have tape of this and are just letting the NFL do its thing.
I've heard whispers that Kensil was manipulating the footballs during the game.TomRicardo said:Fairly respected how so? The account only existed for a couple of days
https://twitter.com/PatriotsSB49/status/560193573917061120Ed Hillel said:I know we don't want to go down the rabbit hole, and obviously this guy is biased, but he is also fairly well-respected from what I can tell:
https://twitter.com/PatriotsSB49/status/560193573917061120
If we learned anything in the last 8 days is if it was tweeted it must be true though...rodderick said:
No way this could have happened.
Just holding it between your legs as you're rubbing the balls could get you near that realm, conceivably. Body heat + buffing.Bone Chips said:and there is no conceivable prep process (I'm thinking of mechanical buffing) that couldn't raise the air temperature from 75 degrees to 90?
Which is why the NDT non-retraction matters.Ed Hillel said:
I'm more interested in whether the guy was on the sidelines at all. That would strongly indicate to me it was a sting. If it was the first ever sting operation run by a league against one of its teams in the major sports...ever (?), it's hard not to believe the people in charge have a strong bias here. I don't think he'd fuck with them on the sidelines either, but I'm not sure I would trust any part of his involvement in the process. If, for example, the Colts balls actually didn't measure below 12.5, I'd like to know how that didn't happen unless they were either overinflated to begin with or someone fudged the numbers. They should have dropped below, given the conditions.
Bone Chips said:Thornton just reported the exact same thing on EEI... "I have it on good authority"
All is fair after Sunday night. Before then, be smart but cautious.Well, if Pats are still taking video of opposing sidelines during games....
PedroKsBambino said:
Well, if Pats are still taking video of opposing sidelines during games....
Somebody should feed it to Florio, along with the Kensil background. Instant ignition.Thornton just reported the exact same thing on EEI... "I have it on good authority"
The Will Leitch piece was beautifully written, but the conclusion is specious.dcmissle said:Darren Rovell was on DC sports radio this morning. He said the NFL gets not a penny if the ratings are goosed. And because the ratings are always so high for the SB, the NFL is never in the position, or close to it, or being on the hook for give-backs to advertisers.
This makes no sense even in the short term, essentially desecrating the signature event in the sport after a crummy PR year.
kartvelo said:I don't see how Kensil could have physically affected the Pats' balls if he was "seen prowling" the Colts sideline.
Well, except for the Jackson interception ball.
Wouldn't the ratings of this super bowl have a direct, quantifiable effect on how much they can sell super bowl rights for next time? (I *really* don't think this is the answer, regardless)8slim said:The Will Leitch piece was beautifully written, but the conclusion is specious.
The NFL has already been paid for Super Bowl 49 by NBC in it's rights deal to carry regular season and playoff games. Just as the NFL is already paid for the next several Super Bowls by CBS, FOX and NBC as well. The TV networks control all of the ad inventory in the pre-game, game, and post-game. The league does not see a dime of that revenue, nor would they see any incremental moneyt from the ratings for any Super Bowl being higher due to increased interest.
Basically Leitch is concluding that the NFL is not just allowing, but encouraging, this circus to continue for some non-quantifiable, indirect financial benefit.
Sometimes the explanation is simple... the NFL is poorly run when it comes to anything aside from TV rights negotiations, marketing, or product licensing. The NFL has excellent business operations, but terrible "game operations", so to speak.
If this is true...Bone Chips said:Thornton just reported the exact same thing on EEI... "I have it on good authority"
And yet under the same circumstances, the Pats managed to do it... to 12 balls. Can he prove he didn't do it? I think he should be suspended and removed from AZ for the duration of the SB.kartvelo said:I don't see how Kensil could have physically affected the Pats' balls if he was "seen prowling" the Colts sideline.
Well, except for the Jackson interception ball.
kartvelo said:
RetractableRoof said:And yet under the same circumstances, the Pats managed to do it... to 12 balls. Can he prove he didn't do it? I think he should be suspended and removed from AZ for the duration of the SB.
Different Utes, obviously.Seonachan said:
I think the opposite. If he's not on the video, then he will have a hard time proving that he didn't do it, because if you can't see what he's doing, he obviously was doing something bad.PedroKsBambino said:Well, if Pats are still taking video of opposing sidelines during games....
Great now we have people comparing BB to Martin Luther.kartvelo said:King completely believes BB. Says a coach said BB would never be that strident if he was lying. Also says Brady is one of the most honorable people he knows. Extolling the virtues of his team-orientation.
Wants to see forensic proof and can't believe they will "come down with the hammer" unless there's some proof (a la Kraft).
Where the hell was ANY of this while the pitchforks were out for the last WEEK?
Nah. He'd mishear Bello and Bradley as Belichick and Brady. So he'd just tweet about a new source confirming they lied.King should listen to less Bruce Springsteen and more Bob Dylan.
I met Eric Grubman years ago. He was/is basically the COO of the league, and he has a pretty impressive business background (partner at Goldman, sr position at constellation energy). He was clear that he has no say - at least at that time - in football ops, which he also seemed to acknowledge is the real juice.8slim said:Sometimes the explanation is simple... the NFL is poorly run when it comes to anything aside from TV rights negotiations, marketing, or product licensing. The NFL has excellent business operations, but terrible "game operations", so to speak.
finnVT said:Wouldn't the ratings of this super bowl have a direct, quantifiable effect on how much they can sell super bowl rights for next time? (I *really* don't think this is the answer, regardless)
twibnotes said:I met Eric Grubman years ago. He was/is basically the COO of the league, and he has a pretty impressive business background (partner at Goldman, sr position at constellation energy). He was clear that he has no say - at least at that time - in football ops, which he also seemed to acknowledge is the real juice.
DennyDoyle'sBoil said:
I do think so very much, because I think it would reinforce the concept that these are difficult matters and this is not a matter for reflexive thinking. I agree that the crazies and haters don't care, but there is going to be a time when serious people debate this, even if they are the minority, and it would be nice if they understand the debate.
simplyeric said:Great now we have people comparing BB to Martin Luther.
Right, but the more people who watch the Super Bowl the more people the NFL can capture, which will increase regular season ratings, as well as ticket and merchandise sales.8slim said:
Eh, theoretically, sure. But as I posted yesterday, Super Bowl ratings have been unfathomably consistent for 40 years. And Super Bowl rights are locked in for the next 8 years. Seems odd to be trying to move the rating marginally in 2015 in advance of rights that expire in 2023.
RedOctober3829 said:Shocking as it may be on both individual's case, but Manish Mehta interviews Kurt Warner and Warner says DeflateGate raises his suspicions even more about the Patriots cheating to win the SB vs. his Rams.
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/kurt-warner-suspicious-patriots-deflategate-article-1.2094128
EL Jeffe said:If Kensil was the NFL Ops guy who the Colts called mid-game because the intercepted ball felt low, isn't reasonable that he'd head over to the Colts sideline and inspect the ball before launching the investigation?
I mean, I get that the Patriots haven't been afforded the benefit of the doubt at any turn throughout this whole manufactured scandal, but still, this Kensil news is likely just him doing due dilligence. I can't see him tampering with footballs in front of 80,000 people.