D&C have been a horrendous listen ever since this started. It's like their brains practice some form of anti-logic normally only found in some parallel universe. They have been SLOWLY coming around lately, but I try to avoid them.Steve Dillard said:It's all about what you want to believe, facts be damned.
Tell me, "how did they get underinflated?
Callahan responded "I think they handed them to Anderson at 11.5" to which Russo says "but all of the balls have Anderson's initials on them"
SOOOOO?
TBD. The owners needed to take to Goodell-Bot in for repairs.NortheasternPJ said:What time is that fraud Goodell showing up today?
Or they handed them to him at 12.5, the Colts at 13.5 and the Colts balls were at like 12.2 at half and he didn't care.Steve Dillard said:It's all about what you want to believe, facts be damned.
Tell me, "how did they get underinflated?
Callahan responded "I think they handed them to Anderson at 11.5" to which Russo says "but all of the balls have Anderson's initials on them"
SOOOOO?
Not sure what you mean. Russo is critical of the Pats, so he thinks he knows what happened.Ed Hillel said:So many possibilities, but critical thinking is hard.
Ed Hillel said:Or they handed them to him at 12.5, the Colts at 13.5 and the Colts balls were at like 12.2 at half and he didn't care.
Or the Colts footballs had been sitting in colder air before being "gauged" pregame (Colts bus?).
So many possibilities, but critical thinking is hard. The bigger question should be why the Colts footballs didn't fall below 12.5, given that we know room temp to game temp should have accounted for a 1.2 difference and the legal range is 1.
geoffm33 said:The 2 star review:
Currently planned for 1:30p ETNortheasternPJ said:What time is that fraud Goodell showing up today?
My theory as well, as laid out in the hawks gate comments. Wanted it published there because I know someone sent that study to the lawyers. If they do their due diligence properly, that scenario should unquestionably be on their list of hypotheses to be tested.lithos2003 said:
Easiest solution that no talking head is saying - there was a complaint about the Pats balls right? Those were then checked first and the Colts balls were checked after that, which would allow them enough time to bounce back somewhat and potentially back in the 12.5-13.5 range.
And J Kraft noon-ish, acc to Gresh just nowDehere said:Currently planned for 1:30p ET
But I thought he said Kraft should fire Belichick a week and a half ago?Kravitz just said he believes the Pats will be fully exonerated on WEEI.
JoeyBelle said:There will obviously be more scrutiny on the footballs this week. So I wonder if that hurts Seattle more than New England. Wilson probably has smaller hands than Brady (I mean, that's what I've heard), so it might be more difficult for him to grip. Am I reaching here?
What? Why? What happened to, "it wasn't colder on the Pats side of the field."Ed Hillel said:Kravitz just said he believes the Pats will be fully exonerated on WEEI.
djbayko said:
I don't think Papelbon or myself are saying not to codify it. We just disagree on the hoops that need to be jumped through and how precise it needs to be. Yes, your proposal is relatively "simple", but given the dozes of other, more important responsibilities the refs need to worry about, the league should be looking to minimize impact here, not increase the number of moving parts. Also, part of your proposal involves bringing a third party into the equation, with ball boys measuring pressure. IMO, this breaks one of the elements of the current NFL regulation that I think they have absolutely correct: "The Referee shall be the sole judge as to whether all balls offered for play comply with these specifications." We should have a single point of accountability - not many - and the refs are *the* arbiters of the game.
FIFA's 8.5 to 15.5 range was just an example. Maybe it works for a football; maybe it doesn't. The point is that a 1 psi range (13.0 +/- 0.5 psi) is ridiculous, given the precision of gauges and the relative pressure difference between even small fluctuations in temperature. Figure out a more reasonable range - one that causes a football to still look, feel, and behave like a football - with some room for error. The only other part of the rule that needs changing is the ambiguity around test methods and conditions. Require a particular type of gauge at room temperature X minutes prior to scheduled kick off and be done with it. Partially deflated footballs in cold weather have never mattered in nearly 100 years of the NFL, and it won't matter next year either. We don't need the refs to be measuring 48 footballs in raining, freezing or blizzard conditions (which, by the way, would introduce a much greater risk of human error).
Of course, while I keep saying this, I also predict that the NFL will instead go overboard with their rule / procedure changes simply because they've unnecessarily escalated the severity of this issue. It is unlikely that Goodell will be practical at the risk of seeming hypocritical (after spending $700K-$2M to investigate this "problem").
Edit: grammar
Late to the party, but just wanted to say that this video is fantastic.shepard50 said:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzKMcYCYIKM&feature=youtu.be
HangingW/ScottCooper said:The wrinkle we haven't seen is a lateral/backwards pass to an inelligible receiver. That is perfectly legal and wouldn't shock me during the Super Bowl.
snowmanny said:It might give me a heart attack but I'm willing to risk it.
mwonow said:
And actually, that ineligible - who the refs would have just told the D not to cover - could either run or throw a forward pass himself...
You mean aside from the fact that the defense can line up 11 men on the line of scrimmage because a 6.5psi ball ain't going anywhere in the air?simplyeric said:No time difference (it's not like anyone wild notice if some nfl official tested the balls, on the field, 15 minutes before the game and again at half time).
If you make the range 8.5 to 15.5, what's stopping someone from submitting 8.5 at room temp (or up to 80d or 90d) and having it be 7 on the field during a cold game in December?
NortheasternPJ said:What time is that fraud Goodell showing up today?
Yeah but the offense might have some guy lie down in the end zone because his jersey matches the paint.nighthob said:You mean aside from the fact that the defense can line up 11 men on the line of scrimmage because a 6.5psi ball ain't going anywhere in the air?
Ed Hillel said:Kravitz just said he believes the Pats will be fully exonerated on WEEI.
Ed Hillel said:Kravitz just said he believes the Pats will be fully exonerated on WEEI.
No "smoking gun"Harry Hooper said:
Because of the facts, or because of the Kraft/Goodell relationship?
soxhop411 said:“@darrenrovell: DeflateGate in perspective: Raiders CB Lester Hayes used to put 8 oz of Kwik Grip on his body each game to help him intercept a ball”
Isn't the rule of thumb in basketball that you hold the ball above you head with an outstretched arm? It ought to, then, bounce up to your elbow.?J.McG said:You would think a simple squeeze test should be more than enough to determine whether the ball is adequately inflated. Or just drop the ball on the ground and if it bounces, you're good to go.
The point is that deflated balls are a competitive disadvantage in the modern (passing-centric) NFL. And balls that deflated aren't going to travel by air at all. Would it theoretically allow RBs to fumble less? Maybe. But since you would be running every play maybe not. Put another way, the simple fact is that every team would submit the balls the way they like them, and if teams willingly choose to eliminate their own passing game, why would an opposing coach complain?simplyeric said:Yeah but the offense might have some guy lie down in the end zone because his jersey matches the paint.
Sure it's stupid, but desperate people do stupid things sometimes.
I don't think its The Most Important Thing, with a modicum of effort they could remove like 90% of the question.
Demonstrated that SumnerH understands the Ideal Gas Law better than many physics professors.TheoShmeo said:At the end of the day, this whole episode:
- Exposed (or confirmed) several national and local mediots as extreme opportunists, soap boxers and abject fools;
- Arguably gave the Patriots an "us versus them" rallying point when it would have otherwise been more difficult to manufacture one;
- Gave Kraft and BB the chance to support the cause in a vocal and even stirring way;
- Probably brought the team even closer together;
- Exposed Goodell once again as a truly horrible and inept leader;
- Will likely not result in the Pats being penalized in any meaningful way; and
- Provided a distraction, and often a humorous one, for Pats fans from the ordinary stress that accompanies a two-week SB wait.
Would I have asked for this knowing what I know now? No. Do I like that Tom Brady does seem to be bothered by it, at least to some extent? No.
But all in all, there are some positives or quasi positives here. That the Pats are probably more galvanized and angry doesn't suck.
Also, as I understand it, the pre-game ball routine for the Super Bowl is much more controlled than it is for other games. Much less margin for monkey business.Red(s)HawksFan said:
Yeah, you're reaching. Wilson has huge hands for his height: 10.25 inches.
ivanvamp said:But they HAD to be tampered with, right? Because……it's the Patriots.
https://twitter.com/greggdoyelstar/status/561214690852757504/URL]Hoya81 said:From Gregg Doyel's Twitter
[