I wish I knew BB's mindset on this. I know he blocks out the noise but is this draining on him or does this become a rallying cry to coach forever and destroy other people?
Is 2007 that long ago? The weapons are not the same but it's worth considering.ShaneTrot said:I wish I knew BB's mindset on this. I know he blocks out the noise but is this draining on him or does this become a rallying cry to coach forever and destroy other people?
Saints Rest said:I've been thinking the same myself, but perhaps the answer is that the NFL really doesn't matter enough for a "real journalist" to devote the time and energy to doing this sort of work Woodward and Bernstein style.
OilCanShotTupac said:
The problem is that journalism, as a business, is dying.
No one has the resources or the inclination to do six months of investigation.
And as I have said several times in the DFG thread, about several different issues involved in the (mis)administration of justice, this - ie the unwillingness/inability of Big Journalism to go beyond hot takez and investigate a substnative story - has profound implications for justice in this country generally, just pick the social ill you care most about. Whatever it is, there is scandalous shit going on, and no one is reporting it
soxhop411 said:New Report Shows NFL Ignored Complaints, Possibly Censored Bill Leavy In Wells Report
http://boston.cbslocal.com/2015/09/17/new-report-shows-nfl-ignored-complaints-possibly-censored-bill-leavy-in-wells-report/
From CBS Boston
riboflav said:
I just read that article and I have no idea what they're implying. That the NFL ignored the issue until the AFC title game?
E5 Yaz said:
That's what it seems to me. That they either didn't care or didn't think it was a big deal ... until it suddenly became one.
riboflav said:
Ok. My reaction to that is no one is going to care at all outside of the Patriots so it will get no traction. Is the idea that it can eventually be linked to an NFL conspiracy to just go after the Patriots?
Looks like just more of Felger assuming that every piece of info that was withheld was withheld because it meant something bad for the Patriots/league. Just like the appeal transcript (half-right there at least).riboflav said:
I just read that article and I have no idea what they're implying. That the NFL ignored the issue until the AFC title game?
ipol said:
Hey, Baltz, doesn't this behavior consistent with the story these guys have told since Day 1? That there was a lot of pressure on them to make sure the balls were within regulation because they sometimes weren't?"[McNally] was always worried about the footballs. Always," Baltz said. "It was very odd. I reported him to the league, but never got any reaction from them."
ipol said:
His whole story sounds goofy to me, if it's part of my job to carry the footballs out to the field, why wouldn't I want to get that done 10-15 minutes before the game instead of waiting until 2 minutes before the game, especially if there's a chance that, if I can, Brady might toss a few to me? And then, when he describes what a normal locker room attendant would do, after waiting until 2 minutes before the game to even ask about the footballs, he makes it sound like the guy never goes to the field at all, saying he's still there when they all leave and lock the door?It's funny that Baltz changed his original story of being suspicious because McNally was playing catch with Brady, to being suspicious because McNally was always worried about the balls. But yet this article confirms via his boss that Baltz reported McNally because he was playing catch.
Ed Hillel said:Plus a SoSHer was on a plane and sat next to him and said he was a massive tool. That should settle it.
I believe that was Billy Joel's original lyric for Keeping The FaithJimBoSox9 said:Like anything else, the good old days weren't as much as you think, and the days ahead are more likely to be the same old times rather than the end days.
Dick Pole Upside said:
That would be me.
Lol I thought he was goofing on both of us, that's pretty funny.ipol said:
That's a crazy story and one I wasn't aware of. I thought EdH was goofing on me a little bit but, obviously, I was wrong. Sorry.
The better quote that really calls Baltz out:djbayko said:Hey, Baltz, doesn't this behavior consistent with the story these guys have told since Day 1? That there was a lot of pressure on them to make sure the balls were within regulation because they sometimes weren't?
Daopoulos said. "And that can be attested by all the officials working in the National Football League. I really don't know what Mark's agenda is right here."
I'm still more interested as to why Dean Pees was interviewed. Not a offensive or special teams coach, so no involvement with ball preparation whatsoever.norm from cheers said:Has anyone interviewed Leavy recently about what he told the investigators for the Wells report? I can't find anything via google
I didn't read it as shit stirring necessarily, just pointing out that the NFL has completely shot any credibility they had no matter what they do now.Van Everyman said:Florio with a bit of a shit stirring post on why #Headsetgate hasn't become a thing like #DFG did:http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/09/20/whatever-happened-to-headsetgate/
The NFL is almost in a no-win situation. If they were to investigate this, it would look like spiteful piling on the Pats after #DFG. And the rightful question to ask given all the reports of faulty communications league-wide would be: How many other investigations have you carried out on this issue?GeorgeCostanza said:I didn't read it as shit stirring necessarily, just pointing out that the NFL has completely shot any credibility they had no matter what they do now.
Who better to speak of this than Marc Brunell?drleather2001 said:"We knew something was fishy when we lost to New England in the 1996/97 AFC championship game!"
Well there was a power outage if my memory is workingEd Hillel said:Who better to speak of this than Marc Brunell?
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/09/21/bills-may-have-gone-too-far-with-pre-play-stadium-sounds/In the memo sent last month reminding all teams of the NFL’s in-stadium noise policies, the league said this: “The home team is permitted to play audio while the visiting team is on offense and the play clock is running. The audio must cease by the time the play clock reaches 20 seconds, or when the visiting team’s offense reaches the line of scrimmage, whichever occurs first. Pursuant to this policy, the visiting team’s offense is considered being at the line of scrimmage when the center touches the ball.”
BroodsSexton said:Wait, why can't they lodge a complaint? It would be interesting to see the response, and they might be wise to build precedent (more precedent) of disparate treatment.