#DFG: Canceling the Noise

Is there any level of suspension that you would advise Tom to accept?


  • Total voters
    208
Apr 7, 2006
2,599
Sally Jenkins is a former senior writer for SI. She secured the last interview with Joe Paterno. She's the daughter of another famed Sports Illustrated writer, Dan Jenkins. Oh, and she's from Fort Worth, TX, so, no, no Boston roots anywhere near her. Not that that should matter - and, of course, given the lazy media already deeply set in their narrative, none of it does - but it's at least nice to be able to cite someone with no agenda whatsoever who is on the side of the good guys.
 

Dirty Sanchez Forever

goose-stepping wannabe
SoSH Member
Jun 7, 2003
213
Putting aside the fact that Borges has no discernible integrity of any kind - plaigiarist, working on behalf of Don King promotions on broadcasts while also covering him in the Globe boxing column, beating up an elderly boxing writer that resulted in Bob Arum dislocating his shoulder, etc, etc, etc, when is the last time he was right about anything concerning the Patriots?  Once Slade, Armstrong, and Bledsoe were gone he had nothing going for sources in that locker room, and most of his criticisms of and predictions for the organization have proven wrong time and again.  He's amusing on some level because he'll say anything for attention and to look like a tough guy but that's about it.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,302
My favorite part of the Jenkins article:
 
The only firm evidence that Brady ever had a conversation with anyone about ball pressure comes in this instance, when the ball was wildly over-inflated to 16 psi — by the league’s own refs.
 
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,447
AZ
lambeau said:
Very good Sally Jenkins article.
For me, the next 16 weeks is a legal preseason cliffhanger which will determine if TB starts the season, which I think is important in determining home field advantage, and thus the outcome of the season--Steelers, Bills, Cowboys are tough games.
The thing that's interesting about Jenkins here is that she actually has the vision to see the better story. I'm not saying this (I don't think) just because I agree with her. I also have liked the Florio stories recently, but wouldn't give him credit for vision, though I will give him credit, like Jenkins, for ignoring the shiny, easy object and actually peeling back some of the layers.

The Ray Rice video caught the league office with it's pants down. Its ridiculous response of breaking the rules to satisfy blood lust instead adressing the problem head on is also something that good journos are keeping an eye on. Its decision to address the issue by having Chris Carter act like he can't speak in a 30 second commercial is shameful and not getting enough attention. Along with concussions, this really is the sports story of the first half of this decade. If the lazy "reporters" took a minute and had half Jenkins' intelligence, they might notice that putting deflategate into this context (even if you believe shenannigans occured) is or at least should be the kind of story they all went into the sports writing business to write.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Borges linked at PFT.

But he will be just the beginning. Charles Pierce already has framed the succeeding narrative: Kraft standing down throws TB under the bus; look for the NEP to cast about for "cheaper" successor to TB, fueled by organizational anger over this.

The worst aspect of the Pierce narrative, which I refuse to post: he will not truly own it; he places it in the minds of semi-paranoid fans.

CHB -- and F&M -- at least would have owned it. Indeed, I expect them to do so before long. Pierce's crap is totally disingenuous.
 

ifmanis5

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2007
64,278
Rotten Apple

jsinger121

@jsinger121
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
17,718
What I am stunned at his how Borges still has any sources in the Pats organization. BB should have flushed those people out by now or at least made a threat to fire anyone that talks to that old fool.
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,451
I'm not upset with the Patriots.  That would be ridiculous.  For fuck's sake, they won a Superbowl a few months ago.  
 
I'm upset still annoyed that the NFL threw up all over themselves and wiped it on Tom Brady and the Patriots.  I'm also annoyed that I got the sporting equivalent of blue balls regarding the whole lead up to the Wells report and then the rebuttal,  thinking at every turn that something would finally go the Patriots' way and it always ending up the opposite. Kraft et. al. could have handled it better, maybe, but it was uncharted waters and 20/20 hindsight is for suckers.
 
I'm already over it.  Fuck it.  
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,345
Borges is a weasel, among other things.  And his use of weasel words stands out.  
 
"...from what I've been told".  Well, what the hell does that mean?  Notice he didn't say "sources inside the Patriots", "sources close to Belichick" or even "sources in the leage office".  And then he goes on to discuss Troy Aikman, without giving any elaboration about this potential bombshell of a story.  Tells you all you need to know about Borges' alleged "source". 
 
There's a reason why hearsay is not considered legal evidence.  
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Suspended
Feb 12, 2003
24,895
where I was last at
I read the Jenkins article and thought, "Why isn't this obvious to everyone?"
 
Most here are hardly objective, "we" wanted the NFL to find the Pats/BB innocent of the charges levied, and many here argued the points Jenkins brings up. My hope is the Brady and his legal team crush Goodell/Wells.
 
I'm probably delusional.
 

drbretto

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 10, 2009
12,213
Concord, NH
A thought occurred to me last night while driving home. Take, for a moment, the emotions out of this whole mess and assume (again, for a moment) that the NFL and Goodell are, indeed, simply fooled by the results and genuinely believe themselves to be right.
 
Would it not make the most sense that Kraft spoke with Goodell, said "this has just gotten out of hand. I respect you, but you got this whole thing wrong. I'm telling you, that wells report was incredibly misleading. I don't have the will to fight this anymore, just promise me when you hear Brady's case you will listen to what he has to say. Do that, and I will unconditionally drop it from my end" and Goodell, being perhaps a buffoon, but intending to be a good man from his own perspective like pretty much everyone on the planet, agrees. They shake hands, hug it out and Kraft makes his press conference.
 
It would fit not only human behavior, but Goodell's words where he said that he is interested in what Tom has to say and whether or not he has any new evidence that could shed light on the situation. And it would be consistent with Goodell remaining quiet all the way through the beginning because he doesn't want to speak on the subject until he has all his facts straight. After the Wells report, he thought he had all his facts straight, but is actually, possibly, able to be convinced otherwise.
 
We've made a lot, lot of assumptions in this thread, and the other one, throughout this whole thing. I still feel like this whole thing is because people see what looks on the surface like a gotcha moment on cheating and reacting emotionally from there. I believe there is actually a legitimate non-zero chance that Goodell hears Brady out and reverses the ruling. Especially if he can convince Goodell that the NFLPA has him dead to rights in a lawsuit. It would be his last chance to be able to get out of it and save face, throwing Wells under the bus and hoping it makes people forget about how they let Brady hang long before that.
 

MuppetAsteriskTalk

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2015
5,458
bankshot1 said:
Is Ross Safko the final arbiter in whether he's at least 43% dildo?
 
 
He could deny it. But he did use the word dildo in his post, so he's more likely than not aware of his general dildoness.
 

Otis Foster

rex ryan's podiatrist
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
1,713
He's clearly a dildo. The important question is w/n he's a vibrating dildo or a DIY dildo. Points for the former.
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,644
drbretto said:
 
It would fit not only human behavior, but Goodell's words where he said that he is interested in what Tom has to say and whether or not he has any new evidence that could shed light on the situation. And it would be consistent with Goodell remaining quiet all the way through the beginning because he doesn't want to speak on the subject until he has all his facts straight. After the Wells report, he thought he had all his facts straight, but is actually, possibly, able to be convinced otherwise.
 
 
 
 
Sorry, but you're reading too much into this. The Commish with these statements is just trying to bolster his case that he will be a fair arbitrator of Brady's appeal, and loves the theater of Brady coming to him hat in hand.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,756
drbretto said:
A thought occurred to me last night while driving home. Take, for a moment, the emotions out of this whole mess and assume (again, for a moment) that the NFL and Goodell are, indeed, simply fooled by the results and genuinely believe themselves to be right.
 
Would it not make the most sense that Kraft spoke with Goodell, said "this has just gotten out of hand. I respect you, but you got this whole thing wrong. I'm telling you, that wells report was incredibly misleading. I don't have the will to fight this anymore, just promise me when you hear Brady's case you will listen to what he has to say. Do that, and I will unconditionally drop it from my end" and Goodell, being perhaps a buffoon, but intending to be a good man from his own perspective like pretty much everyone on the planet, agrees. They shake hands, hug it out and Kraft makes his press conference.
 
It would fit not only human behavior, but Goodell's words where he said that he is interested in what Tom has to say and whether or not he has any new evidence that could shed light on the situation. And it would be consistent with Goodell remaining quiet all the way through the beginning because he doesn't want to speak on the subject until he has all his facts straight. After the Wells report, he thought he had all his facts straight, but is actually, possibly, able to be convinced otherwise.
 
We've made a lot, lot of assumptions in this thread, and the other one, throughout this whole thing. I still feel like this whole thing is because people see what looks on the surface like a gotcha moment on cheating and reacting emotionally from there. I believe there is actually a legitimate non-zero chance that Goodell hears Brady out and reverses the ruling. Especially if he can convince Goodell that the NFLPA has him dead to rights in a lawsuit. It would be his last chance to be able to get out of it and save face, throwing Wells under the bus and hoping it makes people forget about how they let Brady hang long before that.
 
That's not an unreasonable analysis. But the context of Goodell's failures and reversals in the matters of Rice, Peterson and the Saints makes it implausible, IMO.  And I guess "implausible" = "non-zero"
 

Otis Foster

rex ryan's podiatrist
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
1,713
I do think we need to stand back a bit from parsing every word.

Taken in toto, I think he folded his hand, and I wouldn't be surprised if the statement had been coordinated with if not reviewed by RG. I think the absence of reference to TB is quite telling. I think his choice of 'there was inadequate evidence ' vs. ' I'm confident we did nothing wrong' is also telling. I think the absence of any contemporaneous statement by RG speaks volumes - something along the lines of how much Ktaft has again shown a dedication to the interests of the NFL and not to his own interests, etc., etc.

We didn't hear that. Something happened in those fireside chats at the meeting. One factor of course was the likelihood that Kraft would be pushed outside the NFL tent. He couldn't stand being an outlier. From the way this proceeded, with an overnight 180 turn, I surmise that RG has something he held over Kraft's head. This was pretty much a total capitulation, not a negotiated resolution.

Granted this is only a 10,000 foot look by someone with no information that the rest of you also have. Sometimes overall impressions become important.

Edit: no information that the rest of you don't have.
 

drbretto

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 10, 2009
12,213
Concord, NH
Harry Hooper said:
 
 
Sorry, but you're reading too much into this. The Commish with these statements is just trying to bolster his case that he will be a fair arbitrator of Brady's appeal, and loves the theater of Brady coming to him hat in hand.
 
 
Respectfully, I don't think I'm reading too much into anything (prior to my conclusion paragraph).
 
Think about it logically. Goodell and the NFL intentionally crucifying the already Jesusesque Brady in some kind of calculated effort to bring down the face of the franchise is giving them all too much credit. It seems far, far more likely that Goodell is more of a pawn in all of this who is surrounded by people who took Brady's guilt at face value and is bahaving under the assumption that he is, indeed guilty. To orchestrate this mess would have to include knowing how both sides will react to all of this, and in light of the fallback on the Wells report, to continue doing so with the knowledge that the whole thing was a ruse that would easily be brought to light in an impartial court of law would be a suicide move. 
 
It seems far more likely to me that he hired Wells and passed the punishment off so he didn't have to deal with the whole thing. He read the report, took it at face value, signed off on it and that's the extent of thought he has put into the whole mess. Again, surrounded by people cheering him on for coming down so hard on the big bad cheaters that are making a mockery of his league. 
 
Now, my last paragraph definitely gives more credit than it should in terms of his ability to do the right thing here, as at this point there most certainly is a motive to save face for the league, particularly if the alternative to Brady taking the fall vs having to deal with an incompetent league that fucked everything up, then I can see him trying to continue the narrative at this point. That's why I give it a non-zero chance, rather than a good one. But I will maintain that people are giving Goodell too much credit overall on the whole thing. 
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,473
Overland Park, KS
Quoting Borges about an inside BB vs Brady squabble is laughable. Borges is the last guy anyone associated with the Pats would tell of this. If I was BB, it would be a good way to sniff out a rat.
 
If I am Brady, I fight like hell on this. It's costing him money.
 
That Jenkins article is fantastic. BTW, too bad the idiots of the world will not care.
 

Gambler7

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 11, 2003
3,755
https://twitter.com/michaelFhurley/status/601760888195002368
 
 
It really is amazing how many questions he had to answer during that press conference based on the false information (transcript below). He genuinely appeared shocked that this happened. Looking back, being in that spot, thinking all of the statements, including "2" psi decrease are true, it's no wonder he looked like he did. 
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/transcript-tom-brady-press-confrence-deflategate-article-1.2088914
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,761
Here
drbretto said:
 
There is no conspiracy. There doesn't need to be. There are enough people who hate the Pats and their success that all it takes is a whiff of something stinking for everyone to run with it. There's not additional rabbit-hole thought required. It's on the surface.
 
As for the 16 PSI ball, it could be a ref who was like "fuck Tom, I'm going make this a baloon" or whatever that text said, because he was annoyed by Brady's ballboys telling him how to do his job. It could be Dorito Dink exaggerating in a text message. Either way, it's nothing.
 
There's no conspiracy or anything here, but it does kind of demonstrate the whole "integrity of the game" thing regarding a possible .2 PSI deflation is kind of ridiculous when the refs are blowing them up 2.5 PSI over the limits.
 

drbretto

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 10, 2009
12,213
Concord, NH
Ed Hillel said:
 
There's no conspiracy or anything here, but it does kind of demonstrate the whole "integrity of the game" thing regarding a possible .2 PSI deflation is kind of ridiculous when the refs are blowing them up 2.5 PSI over the limits.
 
Absolutely. 
 

natpastime162

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
2,971
Pennsylvania
JeffLedbetter said:
Off the wall thought that came to me yesterday on an airplane: What if the Colts are smarter than we are giving them credit for? What if someone there knew that the weather conditions would bring the air pressure down in the balls and they put more air in their balls to start, knowing theirs would be fine at halftime and the Patriots' would not? 
If anything, the Colts' genius in this whole shitstorm was getting everyone to overlook how far they looked from winning a Super Bowl in the near future.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
36,053
Deep inside Muppet Labs
natpastime162 said:
If anything, the Colts' genius in this whole shitstorm was getting everyone to overlook how far they looked from winning a Super Bowl in the near future.
No one was happier for all of this than Chuck Pagano, because he didn 't have to answer any questions about why he punted down 24-7 and 31-7 in the 3rd quarter.
 

J.McG

New Member
Aug 11, 2011
204
Caught the last few minutes of Mike & Mike on ESPN2 this morning, with Buster Olney filling in alongside Greenberg. They were discussing Will Smith's ejection last night for having pine tar on his forearm, and Olney was asked how this compared to Tom Brady's alleged football tampering.
 
Olney thought the Smith infraction was no big deal, and that MLB should consider allowing all pitchers to utilize some form of sticky substance to provide them with better control because, in his opinion, it provides no competitive advantage. Olney then asserted that Brady's alleged ball tampering wasn't even remotely comparable, arguing it indeed provided him w/ a competitive advantage, and since Brady is the only QB to ever be caught screwing around w/ the PSI after official inspection, it made his offense that much more devious.
 
Olney really went off the rails when asked the following: had Brady committed what one would consider an equally egregious competitive violation in the game of baseball, would it keep him out of the Hall of Fame? Olney said yes, Brady's offense would place him in the group of otherwise great players whose cheating, largely via use of PEDs, invalidates much of their accomplishments, citing  Bonds, Clemens, and A-Rod as examples. Greenberg largely agreed w/ Olney, and was of the opinion that, while he still believes Brady is a HoF'er, he'd be surprised if this scandal doesn't ultimately cost him an opportunity at 1st ballot enshrinement, and he could be forced to wait an extra year or more as a form of further punishment for his transgressions.
 
So that's where we're at from a national perspective -- Brady, a guy with no prior record of any kind, is now being lumped in with the most notorious cheaters of all time by two (relatively) level-headed members of the sports media. All for what Ted Wells claims was likely a "general awareness" of a "more probable than not" illegal deflation scheme. If the HoF voters do in fact attempt to band together to block Brady from getting in on the 1st ballot, I really hope Brady refuses to attend any and all enshrinement ceremonies in protest. It's become more and more clear to me that Brady absolutely needs to fight this til the bitter end if he wants any shot at changing the narrative surrounding his legacy.
 

simplyeric

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 14, 2006
14,037
Richmond, VA
J.McG said:
Caught the last few minutes of Mike & Mike on ESPN2 this morning, with Buster Olney filling in alongside Greenberg. They were discussing Will Smith's ejection last night for having pine tar on his forearm, and Olney was asked how this compared to Tom Brady's alleged football tampering.
 
Olney thought the Smith infraction was no big deal, and that MLB should consider allowing all pitchers to utilize some form of sticky substance to provide them with better control because, in his opinion, it provides no competitive advantage. Olney then asserted that Brady's alleged ball tampering wasn't even remotely comparable, arguing it indeed provided him w/ a competitive advantage, and since Brady is the only QB to ever be caught screwing around w/ the PSI after official inspection, it made his offense that much more devious.
 
Olney really went off the rails when asked the following: had Brady committed what one would consider an equally egregious competitive violation in the game of baseball, would it keep him out of the Hall of Fame? Olney said yes, Brady's offense would place him in the group of otherwise great players whose cheating, largely via use of PEDs, invalidates much of their accomplishments, citing  Bonds, Clemens, and A-Rod as examples. Greenberg largely agreed w/ Olney, and was of the opinion that, while he still believes Brady is a HoF'er, he'd be surprised if this scandal doesn't ultimately cost him an opportunity at 1st ballot enshrinement, and he could be forced to wait an extra year or more as a form of further punishment for his transgressions.
 
So that's where we're at from a national perspective -- Brady, a guy with no prior record of any kind, is now being lumped in with the most notorious cheaters of all time by two (relatively) level-headed members of the sports media. All for what Ted Wells claims was likely a "general awareness" of a "more probable than not" illegal deflation scheme. If the HoF voters do in fact attempt to band together to block Brady from getting in on the 1st ballot, I really hope Brady refuses to attend any and all enshrinement ceremonies in protest. It's become more and more clear to me that Brady absolutely needs to fight this til the bitter end if he wants any shot at changing the narrative surrounding his legacy.
That's really amazing.
'Sure he broke the rules but it's not big deal and anyway it gives them better control, but better control doesn't give a competitive advantage'
How can 'better control' not be a competitive advantage? Isn't that exactly what supposed advantage Brady was seeking?
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,761
Here
Olney thought the Smith infraction was no big deal, and that MLB should consider allowing all pitchers to utilize some form of sticky substance to provide them with better control because, in his opinion, it provides no competitive advantage.
 
It's funny, because these are almost exactly the same thing. On the opposite end of the spectrum, committing a PED violation in baseball is some gigantic smear to the integrity of the game that will get you shunned and banished from the HoF, whereas a PED violation in football is punished less severely and not considered much of a legacy issue. My guess is that when Haloti Ngata's name comes up for the HoF, nobody will care much about his PED use, for example. Nor Ray Lewis (deer antler spray/the murder thing).
 
I mean, it's a pretty messed up world where Ray Lewis gets in on the first ballot (which we all know will happen) and Tom Brady may not. Hopefully the passage of time and maybe a Brady interview or two will slow this crazy train a bit.
 

drbretto

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 10, 2009
12,213
Concord, NH
JimD said:
What does Goodell and the league have on Bob Kraft and the Patriots - maybe not related to this faux controversy, but something - that would explain Kraft's defeated body language and this complete and total capitulation?  Kraft could have dropped the appeal in a way that didn't go out of his way in embarrassing the commissioner but still made it clear that he believed in his quarterback and organization.  His tone after the meeting had the feel of someone who just had the screws put to him.   
 
They don't have to have anything on him at all. Kraft finally calmed down, thought about it logically, realized there's not a damn thing he can do about it and pulled out before spending money to hurt the league he's part owner of.
 

BoredViewer

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
3,092
Rudy Pemberton said:
There's also like, no evidence, that deflating a ball gives you any kind of advantage...especially since there are other QB's who prefer the exact opposite.
 
This whole thing is as if we are stuck in some kind of bizarro world, I can't believe we are still talking about this. I honestly can't believe anything about this saga...it is quite possibly the stupidest controversy in the history of mankind.
 
I believe it is a leading cause behind Brady's shitty long passes that turn into ducks.
 
I've played a little QB (yo!) and while beach balls suck, I'd never want a ball that was too squishy, either.
 

drbretto

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 10, 2009
12,213
Concord, NH
That, too. I mean, don't get me wrong. I was disappointed at first, too. But mostly I was caught up in what was looking like was going to be a heavyweight throwdown, but after taking a breath, what else could he do? Brady's got the recourse to get it to court. Kraft can't do anything right now.
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,509
drbretto said:
 
They don't have to have anything on him at all. Kraft finally calmed down, thought about it logically, realized there's not a damn thing he can do about it and pulled out before spending money to hurt the league he's part owner of.
There's also the possibility that Kraft saw further appeals damaging his other business interests that have been developed with the league, networks or other owners as a result of owning the team. Patriot Place is a significant investment that depends to some degree on good relationships with entities that do business with the NFL. It wouldn't surprise me there are side deals involving some of the other Kraft Group properties, similar to the NFL's promotion of Microsoft products (Surface/XBox) benefiting Paul Allen. I don't think Goodell was making direct threats, more that Kraft saw the writing in the wall.
 

drbretto

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 10, 2009
12,213
Concord, NH
BoredViewer said:
 
I believe it is a leading cause behind Brady's shitty long passes that turn into ducks.
 
I've played a little QB (yo!) and while beach balls suck, I'd never want a ball that was too squishy, either.
 
I think some might be overestimating how much that .5 PSI really is. It's nothing. Like literally imperceptable.
 

Rice14

New Member
Apr 23, 2008
61
South Florida
As a Dolphins fan, I find this whole thing laughable and overblown.
 
In 35 years of watching football, I have never ever heard a single person reference air pressure of a football. Not a player, a coach, or an announcer. Now suddenly it's this huge issue that can lead to a big competitive advantage? If that were the case, then why were there stricter protocols in place to begin with? Why would you not have the referee carefully inspect and record the measurements of each ball before the game and then places those balls in a secure location? Why would you be more diligent about the K balls than the balls being used for 98% of the game? Why would you not have referees checking pressure throughout the game particularly when the weather is extreme? It sure leaves me with the impression that nobody ever cared about this before.
 
When the Colts voiced their concern, if the NFL did indeed feel like it was a big issue, then why not send a warning to every team about the issue? Maybe, follow up with a phone call to the Patriots? Wouldn't you have Walt Anderson on high alert?
 
I think that the Pats guys did likely mess around with the balls, I just don't understand why the NFL let it get to that point and why the whole affair wasn't settled with a small fine and a reminder to the whole league not to mess with the balls after they've been checked.
 
Roger Goodell wanted to play sheriff on this one, and the whole thing has been a bigger embarrassment to the NFL than the Patriots.
 

KFP

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Sep 5, 2014
65
We're somewhere around 50 posts removed in less than 24 hours.
 
If your post was removed, think about why.
 
Stop being awful.
 

MillarTime

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
1,338
ESPN is basically the NFL's PR arm at this point and they're really not trying to hide it. I'm not surprised a milquetoast ESPN radio show is falling right in line. Also, I'm convinced the handling of Simmons' departure is directly related. ESPN is silencing one of Goodell's most visible critics at a time when he has clearly left himself open to criticism.
 

Section15Box113

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2005
8,925
Inside Lou Gorman's Head
BoredViewer said:
 
I believe it is a leading cause behind Brady's shitty long passes that turn into ducks.
 
I've played a little QB (yo!) and while beach balls suck, I'd never want a ball that was too squishy, either.
If we focus less on Deflategate (TM) and more on the impact of different QB preferences on both the feel of the ball and certain throws, seems there could be an interesting Inside the Pylon piece. Why would Brady want 12.5? Do we see the implications in game tape? What about Rodgers at 13.5 (+)?

Or is it really such a small difference that the impact is diminimus, overshadowed by dozens of other factors?

Paging Mark to the courtesy phone.

By the way - and off topic - kudos to Dave for his "Throwaway" piece on the Rams SB. Really well done. Y'all should give it a read.
 

J.McG

New Member
Aug 11, 2011
204
Section15Box113 said:
If we focus less on Deflategate (TM) and more on the impact of different QB preferences on both the feel of the ball and certain throws, seems there could be an interesting Inside the Pylon piece. Why would Brady want 12.5? Do we see the implications in game tape? What about Rodgers at 13.5 (+)? Or is it really such a small difference that the impact is diminimus, overshadowed by dozens of other factors?
 
ESPN Sport Science did a segment on this very topic (clip spoilered below), which was immediately and unsurprisingly buried by the network in the lead up to the Super Bowl. They found a deflated ball @ 10.5 PSI had negligible impacts on grip, and was more of a disadvantage in the passing game, all else being equal.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvThG95skI4
 
Heard some radio show the other day claim that Myth Busters is planning an entire "DeflateGate" episode next season - don't know if that has since been verified (if they aren't planning one yet, what the hell are they waiting for???).
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,509
http://www.csnne.com/new-england-patriots/ted-wells-roger-goodell-covering-up-nfls-deflategate-misconduct

"I e-mailed Greg Aiello, the NFL’s VP of media relations on Thursday and asked him about Wells’ allegedly telling the team that the league wasn’t going to be scrutinized by Wells in his investigation.

Greg,

I'm finding something incongruous in both Roger and Ted Wells' insistence that Wells also included the league and its demeanor in his investigation.

On February 7, Patriots attorney Daniel Goldberg emailed Jeff Pash to protest Wells' telling the Patriots that the league would investigate itself internally and that the league was not under Wells' purview. The email came under the subject "Scope of Investigation" and was released by the Pats in the "Wells Report Context" rebuttal.

Pash did not correct Goldberg on that point, only reiterated a guarantee of no prejudgment.

So if Wells was not charged with reviewing the league, how can both he and Roger insist a review was done?

And that's not even raising the issue of how perfunctory Wells' "findings" about the leagues demeanor and actions were which Roger seems to credit as being exhaustive.

So what changed after February 7?

Aiello's response:

Tom: I do not anticipate that we will comment further on the Wells report.

Thanks.
Greg"
 

geoduck no quahog

not particularly consistent
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 8, 2002
13,024
Seattle, WA
Section15Box113 said:
If we focus less on Deflategate (TM) and more on the impact of different QB preferences on both the feel of the ball and certain throws, seems there could be an interesting Inside the Pylon piece. Why would Brady want 12.5? Do we see the implications in game tape? What about Rodgers at 13.5 (+)?

Or is it really such a small difference that the impact is diminimus, overshadowed by dozens of other factors?

Paging Mark to the courtesy phone.

By the way - and off topic - kudos to Dave for his "Throwaway" piece on the Rams SB. Really well done. Y'all should give it a read.
 
Related to the above, consider this: 
 
I assume all QB's practice with a ball inflated to their liking. I also assume most practices are done either indoors (e.g., Seahawks) or at least in weather conditions that can be substantially different than gametime. 
 
My point is how unlikely it is that footballs throughout gameday are close in pressure/feel to those used in practice if gameday occurs in extreme weather conditions. 
 
To belabor the point - Green Bay has an indoor practice facility, so Rodgers practices with balls inflated to the top end. When he plays at Lambeau the temperature could be 20 degrees. We know what that does to a football measured in the locker room.
 
So I too wonder if even the quarterbacks are actually impacted by inflation levels, or if it's just in their heads. This is backed up even more with the Jets game measurements, which were an order of magnitude beyond acceptability (2.5 psi...which if taken the other way would mean a 12.5 football could have been introduced to the game at 10 psi!). Now that's an understandable difference.