If I were a really impartial person trying to get to the truth here, what I would do is give this report to the company that Wells used and ask them to respond. And then I'd go back to AEI as necessary. And I would keep doing it until they either agreed or they each could concisely state the exact point of their disagreement so that I could make a judgment about which seemed more credible. Or, I would hire a third neutral.
These aren't disputes of fact. This isn't he said she said. This is science, and if the league was interested in the truth that's what it would do.
These aren't disputes of fact. This isn't he said she said. This is science, and if the league was interested in the truth that's what it would do.