QUOTE (JakeBadlands @ Jun 4 2010, 06:15 PM)
index.php?act=findpost&pid=3005300
I have to disagree with you on this completely. Regardless of the actual opinions, what Felger is doing is schtick. Neumie and his fucking meta-analysis just killed it for me. I'm paraphrasing, but he said something to the effect of "you just want to hate on Kobe so you can fill five minutes of radio time." Well, yeah, Bob. That's the point. If we were all going to be completely honest and factual about it, talk radio would cease to exist. It's not a format that lends itself to spreadsheets and pitch charts. I mean, most people understand on this board that it's useless to pick winners this early in the baseball season, but what would our talking heads talk about if they didn't do just that? When I want to read detailed explanations of shit I barely understand, I come here. When I want to be entertained by some harmless bombast and douchebaggery, I tune into Felger. Listening to Neumeier taking him to task as if they were having some serious debate about the relative merits of European hockey players was just painful and awkward. It was like he broke the fourth wall.
Say what you will about Tony, but he usually takes Felger's bait, which, IMO, makes them a decent pair. (Mazz on his own, however... no thank you).
I didn't really enjoy Neumie either, but not for that reason.
He just seemed all over the place, and never firmly stated an opinion. That stuff on Thursday about "not picking a winner" was weak.
And what is with this astonishment that he comes to a radio show with notes? I mean, he said how many minutes Pau Gasol played last night, and Mazz acted like that was top secret information that you have to really go digging for.
Maybe if he was a regular, he would have more of a role, but I don't know, I really didn't think he added much.
Felger is a tough guy to work with. You have to be on your "A game," or else you won't get in a meaningful word. I don't think Neumie said anything all that meaningful this week.