Not to stick up for JWH here, but at no point did he say that he still didn't want Crawford on the team, he said AT THE TIME he opposed the signing for a number of reasons. Both Werner and Lucchino already came out and said that Theo had to push to sign Crawford so it has been known for months that the ownership wasn't united in his signing, I just don't see the big deal with Henry admitting he was one of the hold outs.
Does it really matter which owner didn't want him at the time? Honestly, I want the principle owner of the team to need to be convinced that a very long term contract for big money is worth it.
Does it really matter which owner didn't want him at the time? Honestly, I want the principle owner of the team to need to be convinced that a very long term contract for big money is worth it.