Jonas Gray - Kickstarting for an Atomic Alarm Clock

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
rodderick said:
 
So are you willing to say his poor results against Denver were due to the OL not doing its job? Because you can't have it both ways. Obviously the OL had a lot to do with his performance on Sunday, but to just discard his efforts as if they were meaningless is pretty unfair. I saw a lot of tough running for extra yardage against the Colts. 
 
No, I'm not willing to make any statements about him after 50-60 carries.  We were pretty pleased with Brandon Bolden after that many carries in 2012 and again in 2013, but you don't see any threads about him now, do you?
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,726
Lose Remerswaal said:
 
....
 
  You or I could have gained 199 yards on Sunday.
 
 
 
This is flat out false (in its implications, obviously you don't mean it literally). I'd venture that neither Brandon Bolden or James White or even Shane Vereen could have got 199 yards. There were holes but he hit them hard and had great YAC. I totally hear you on not putting him in the HOF after one good game -- let's see how he does after his body has absorbed a beating -- but for one game he did all the right things: hit the right holes, hit them explosively, read his blockers correctly, broke through arm tackles, and pushed the pile. It's all we have to go on so far, so that shouldn't be dismissed, even as it shouldn't be blown up to be more than one game.
 

Ralphwiggum

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2012
9,837
Needham, MA
Lose Remerswaal said:
Can we please calm down for a minute?

Remember his stats against Denver?  12 carries, 33 yards sound familiar?
 
Let's not buy him a ticket to Canton (Ohio) quite yet.  Let's see him against the Lions first, ok?  They've got a good DL, so I've heard.
 
WTF are you talking about.
 
Most of the posts in this thread are talking about him maybe being able to play the Ridley role, or being a different version of BJGE.  Many note that he's carried the ball very few times so we don't really know yet.  One had the audacity to say that he might be a "solid" back in the league.  There is one Corey Dillon comparison that is obviously premature, but even in that case it is obvious that the poster meant that his performance in that one game reminded him of Dillon, not that he'd become Corey Dillon.  I see a pretty reasoned discussion of what we might expect from a guy who just had a pretty huge breakout game but has almost zero track record before then.
 
Thankfully you were here to calm down the irrational exuberance going on here.
 

phenweigh

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 8, 2005
1,379
Brewster, MA
I don't think Jonas Gray is the second coming of Larry Csonka, but he ran like him last Sunday.  Csonka had a well regarded O-line.
 

Jettisoned

Member
SoSH Member
May 6, 2008
1,059
From re-watching the game it seems to me that a big reason for all the run yards was that the Pats were putting a lot of big dudes out there to block and the Colts were just sticking to their base defense.  This led to a lot of plays where the first level of the Colts defense was blocked completely and Gray was free to charge into the secondary at guys 30 pounds lighter than himself.
 
There's one play where the Pats come out with 22 personnel, with Fleming and Gronk on either side of the line and Develin at FB.  The Colts stayed with their base 3-4, and their front 7 were blocked tidily by 7 huge dudes.  Is it typical for teams to use their base defense to defend against 22 personnel?  Wouldn't it have made more sense for them to swap out a SS or CB with a LB, especially considering the 2nd "TE" is an OT?
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,105
A Scud Away from Hell
Before we put Jonas in the Hall of Fame, this is what Blount did in 2013 PO:
  • Divisional game vs. Colts: 24 rushes for 166 yards & 4 TDs
  • AFCCG vs. Broncos: 5 rushes for 6 yards
Even before Brady had to chuck it up to catch up in vein, it was pretty obvious that the rushing game was ineffective vs Denver after looking so good the week before. 
 
Having said that, Jonas looks like a real keeper even if the cover of SI is a bit much. 
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,434
Philadelphia
Jettisoned said:
From re-watching the game it seems to me that a big reason for all the run yards was that the Pats were putting a lot of big dudes out there to block and the Colts were just sticking to their base defense.  This led to a lot of plays where the first level of the Colts defense was blocked completely and Gray was free to charge into the secondary at guys 30 pounds lighter than himself.
 
There's one play where the Pats come out with 22 personnel, with Fleming and Gronk on either side of the line and Develin at FB.  The Colts stayed with their base 3-4, and their front 7 were blocked tidily by 7 huge dudes.  Is it typical for teams to use their base defense to defend against 22 personnel?  Wouldn't it have made more sense for them to swap out a SS or CB with a LB, especially considering the 2nd "TE" is an OT?
 
Playing a 6th OL for that many snaps (and outside goal line and short yardage situations) is so unusual that its likely that the Colts simply didn't have a personnel package in place for dealing with the situation.  They obviously could have changed up on the fly but its not that easy just to say to a LB, "Hey you go play safety on this series."  That guy doesn't know the run assignments, much less what the heck he's supposed to do in the passing game.  And while the Pats ran almost exclusively out of the 6 OL package, they did mix in a couple pretty effective passing plays to make sure that the Colts couldn't sell out entirely on the run just because Fleming was in the game.
 
All this does suggest, however, that teams in the future are likely to be better prepared for this heavy package.  I think its a look that the Patriots will use in other games, but I doubt its ever so devastating or heavily relied upon again.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,488
Jettisoned said:
From re-watching the game it seems to me that a big reason for all the run yards was that the Pats were putting a lot of big dudes out there to block and the Colts were just sticking to their base defense.  This led to a lot of plays where the first level of the Colts defense was blocked completely and Gray was free to charge into the secondary at guys 30 pounds lighter than himself.
 
There's one play where the Pats come out with 22 personnel, with Fleming and Gronk on either side of the line and Develin at FB.  The Colts stayed with their base 3-4, and their front 7 were blocked tidily by 7 huge dudes.  Is it typical for teams to use their base defense to defend against 22 personnel?  Wouldn't it have made more sense for them to swap out a SS or CB with a LB, especially considering the 2nd "TE" is an OT?
 
Yes and no. Usually coaches have their own preference on how to align their personnel. Some coaches like to stay in a base defense and invert safeties with cornerbacks to protect the edges, or invert strong side safety with strong side corner. Some coaches (in 4-3 defenses, usually) will change their formation stack (4-3 over/under/strong/etc). Some 3-4 defenses will change up to a 3-5-3, which the colts should have tried.
 
I think there's a strong correlation between the point you mentioned (Colts staying in their base defense) and why BB ran the offense the way he did. Why the Colts decided to go this route (my guess is Gronk) is a good topic of discussion.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
Super Nomario said:
 
I just saw a Matt Waldman Tweet that I think highlights this:
Matt Waldman @MattWaldman  ·  37m 37 minutes ago
I say this a ton on podcasts, but worth repeating. The amount of RB talent outpaces demand at the position.
Today's cuts of Ben Tate and LGBT highlight Waldman's point pretty nicely.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,242
I think the straw man constructed in this thread that people think Gray is the best ever could have rushed for 199 yards last game!!!!
 

Phragle

wild card bitches
SoSH Member
Jan 1, 2009
13,154
Carmine's closet
If it's OK with Lose Remerswaal I'd like to start saying Jonas Gray is Jamal Lewis
 
https://twitter.com/RLiuNFL/status/534780362103087104
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
They must have revised the stat sheet and wiped out the loss for two that was nullified by a facemask penalty. I was kind of surprised that was counted in the first place. That also means the Patriots were 9 of 11 on 3rd down and perfect on 3rd down in the second half.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,242
Super Nomario said:
They must have revised the stat sheet and wiped out the loss for two that was nullified by a facemask penalty. I was kind of surprised that was counted in the first place. That also means the Patriots were 9 of 11 on 3rd down and perfect on 3rd down in the second half.
 
So if the facemask occurs on a negative play the play is wiped out, but on a positive play it is added to the end?
 
 

NickEsasky

Please Hammer, Don't Hurt 'Em
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2001
9,211
First 200 hundred yard rusher this season I believe. 
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
DrewDawg said:
 
So if the facemask occurs on a negative play the play is wiped out, but on a positive play it is added to the end?
 
Yeah, I don't really understand how it works. The other thing is that, if you recall, the Colts also had an offsides penalty that was declined that would have obviously resulted in no play. The Patriots took the 15-yarder over the 5-yarder, but perhaps because there was also a "no play" penalty they wiped this one, too. I don't know.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,434
Philadelphia
Super Nomario said:
Yeah, I don't really understand how it works. The other thing is that, if you recall, the Colts also had an offsides penalty that was declined that would have obviously resulted in no play. The Patriots took the 15-yarder over the 5-yarder, but perhaps because there was also a "no play" penalty they wiped this one, too. I don't know.
 
I think its always this way with negative plays on which the defensive commits a personal foul during the play.  For example, on sacks where the pass rusher hits the QB illegally (to the head or knee for instance), its always no play and a 15 yard penalty, not a 15 yard penalty assessed from the point of the sack.
 
The referee crew just seemed really confused in the aftermath of this play, probably because there were flags all over the place (there was actually a pretty clear third penalty on the play as well that the referees either missed or didn't even bother mentioning, as the Colts had an obvious 12 men on the field when the ball was snapped).
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,697
Oregon
Phragle said:
If it's OK with Lose Remerswaal I'd like to start saying Jonas Gray is Jamal Lewis
 
https://twitter.com/RLiuNFL/status/534780362103087104
 
How do they do this? Do they look at every run?
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
Morgan's Magic Snowplow said:
 
I think its always this way with negative plays on which the defensive commits a personal foul during the play.  For example, on sacks where the pass rusher hits the QB illegally (to the head or knee for instance), its always no play and a 15 yard penalty, not a 15 yard penalty assessed from the point of the sack.
 
The referee crew just seemed really confused in the aftermath of this play, probably because there were flags all over the place (there was actually a pretty clear third penalty on the play as well that the referees either missed or didn't even bother mentioning, as the Colts had an obvious 12 men on the field when the ball was snapped).
This isn't the ref's call though, is it? This is purely official scoring, since it's a 15-yard penalty either way. It's just whether it's officially a "play" or "no play" and thus whether the stats count or don't count.
 

Jettisoned

Member
SoSH Member
May 6, 2008
1,059
Morgan's Magic Snowplow said:
The referee crew just seemed really confused in the aftermath of this play, probably because there were flags all over the place (there was actually a pretty clear third penalty on the play as well that the referees either missed or didn't even bother mentioning, as the Colts had an obvious 12 men on the field when the ball was snapped).
 
I don't know if they missed the 12 men penalty--#94 was the guy who didn't get off the field in time and they called him offside.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,236
Here
Could be sick, could have been late. Nice to have Blount as a backup option, either way.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Not really the smartest move for a guy coming off his first real success a day after they signed a veteran at his position, but glad he's not hurt.  Wonder if Blount starts Sunday and takes a few carries.
 

bakahump

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 8, 2001
7,568
Maine
I know there is no excuse for missing practice.
 
But I also think dude ran it 37 times last week.  THIRTY SEVEN.  He has to be sore.
 
For comparison…..
 
You know how many times in his career Adrian Peterson has carried it 37 times?
 
Never.  Career high 35
 
You know how many times Emmitt Smith carried it 37 times?
Never. Career high 35
 
You know how many times Walter Peyton carried it 37 times?
3 times.  (40,39 and 38 carries once each).
 
37 is a metric f*ckton.
 

bluefenderstrat

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2002
2,591
Tralfamadore
bakahump said:
I know there is no excuse for missing practice.
 
But I also think dude ran it 37 times last week.  THIRTY SEVEN.  He has to be sore.
 
For comparison…..
 
You know how many times in his career Adrian Peterson has carried it 37 times?
 
Never.  Career high 35
 
You know how many times Emmitt Smith carried it 37 times?
Never. Career high 35
 
You know how many times Walter Peyton carried it 37 times?
3 times.  (40,39 and 38 carries once each).
 
37 is a metric f*ckton.
 
OK, we'll forgive him, this time.   But LGBT is lurking.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
I guess he was too sore to reach down and plug in a phone charger or something.
 
Obviously not a huge deal if this is a first offense, but probably costs him a series Sunday if I had to guess.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,104
AZ
Jonas, it’s LaGarrette.  I need you to hook me up.
 
What’s up?
 
Timlin’s a dick.  He ruined my name.  I need a big week, show what I can do.
 
I support you, pal.  If you succeed, the team succeeds, and that’s good.  A friendly competition, you and me.  Synergy, you know?
 
Yeah.  No.  That’s not what I’m talking about here.  I need it, THIS week.
 
What are you asking?
 
Blow off a practice.  Bill will let me start.
 
Ah, man, I can’t do that.  I’m just getting my feet here.  Don’t ask me to do that.
 
Buy you an Escalade.
 
Huh?
 
You heard me.
 
Leather and a sunroof?
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,717
Devizier said:
 
Trent Richardson being the reason for the "pretty much" qualifier.
 
If you want to see Trent Richardson hit the hole and grind out 12 hard inches I have the hightlight tape for you...
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
62,319
DennyDoyle'sBoil said:
Jonas, it’s LaGarrette.  I need you to hook me up.
 
What’s up?
 
Timlin’s a dick.  He ruined my name.  I need a big week, show what I can do.
 
I support you, pal.  If you succeed, the team succeeds, and that’s good.  A friendly competition, you and me.  Synergy, you know?
 
Yeah.  No.  That’s not what I’m talking about here.  I need it, THIS week.
 
What are you asking?
 
Blow off a practice.  Bill will let me start.
 
Ah, man, I can’t do that.  I’m just getting my feet here.  Don’t ask me to do that.
 
Buy you an Escalade.
 
Huh?
 
You heard me.
 
Leather and a sunroof?
 
That's kind.  I was thinking more LGBT texted him all night till the battery drained.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Paging Jonas Gray's agent and social media consultant to the courtesy phone....Jonas Gray's agent and social media consultant your client needs your assistance...
 

nazz45

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,919
Eternia
Here's a deeper look at Gray and the performance of his blockers:
 
 
The burly running back carried the ball 37 times for 201 yards (5.4 per carry average), becoming the first NFL rusher to eclipse the 200-yard mark this season. In addition, 16 of his 37 rush attempts resulted in either a first down or a touchdown. Gray also successfully converted all three of his third and less than four-yards-to-go runs.
 
After reviewing all of Gray’s rush attempts, a conservative tally revealed 98 yards accrued after first contact by a Colts defender. The powerful, compact running back also caused 13 missed and/or broken tackles.
 
 
Following review of the tape, the Patriots utilized a pulling blocker (offensive lineman or tight end) on 17 of the 38 official runs (including running back Shane Vereen’s lone carry), accumulating 113 total yards for an average of 6.7 yards per carry.
 
 
While pull blocks and traps were a staple of the run offense throughout the game, the extended use of the fullback also stood out. The Patriots utilized Develin as a lead blocker on 18 of Gray’s runs, gaining a total of 97 yards for a 5.4 average.
 
Now, hopefully Jonas doesn't tweet himself into Belichick's doghouse.