E5 Yaz said:
True. But given the number of seventh-rounders who don't make it anyway, would burning such a pick have been that bad?
Maintain the guy's rights and, if he was indicted, never offer a deal
I'm pretty sure it doesn't work this way. If he's drafted, he can refuse to reach a contract agreement and re-enter the draft. If he's cleared, he's almost certainly going to be a top round talent, and so won't want to be slotted at the very low money he'd be offered.
Of course, if he's not drafted, he's stuck in the UDFA camp, which is a shitty camp, because there's a very tight restriction on the amount of money teams are allowed to spend (I assume specifically to prevent the kind of refuse-to-enter-draft-become-a-free-agent kind of ploy.)
The system isn't very well structured to handle this kind of case. I'm surprised they didn't allow him as a supplemental. [Edit: Except for the fact that the NFL doesn't really need extra controversy and probably doesn't want to be seen extending work-arounds to potential murderers, even if he's not even really a potential murderer and this is blown out of proportion. It's a crappy headline, and they gain virtually nothing by it.]