There was an article in the Daily Mail last November that contains every significant fact mentioned in that story. I think it's plagiarized.
Yeah, the "sell Suarez for a dollar, and replace him with three quarters, two dimes and a nickel" plan doesn't seem to be paying off.MiracleOfO2704 said:Ings was great, but this team just doesn't look like a good squad at all.
SocrManiac said:The cliche is that good teams make the most of their chances. Look at Juvé against City last week.
DLew On Roids said:On Rodgers: I'm done. Not sack-him-today-it's-a-disaster done, but he's-never-going-to-win-big-find-the-next-guy done.
OK, he's had a radically changed squad in each of his four years. That's life at this level, where the clubs with the megabucks buy your 50M+ players and you have to retool. He just can't do it quickly enough to compete with the best managers in the Big Five leagues. I see players out of position, asked to play in systems that don't emphasize their strengths (Benteke, Can, Mignolet). I see players with enormous potential set aside while Rodgers chases the next shiny tactical solution (Moreno, Markovic). I see players who aren't cutting it given chance after chance because the manager sees something (Allen, Lucas).
There are nubs of justification for each of these decisions. I love Lucas's workrate and protection of the CBs. Can will be an outstanding box-to-box midfielder someday if his development continues apace. But the big picture is lost on Rodgers. He can't envision and implement an XI that minimizes the weaknesses and accentuates the strengths while having the creativity to unlock weakers opponents and being sound at the back. That's a tall order, sure, but that's the expectation at a club with more resources than all but about 10 clubs in the world. You need to be a world-class manager. Rodgers is a decent manager who, given half a season, can figure out how to construct an XI that causes major problems for other sides. He isn't fit for this level at this time, though.
BCsMightyJoeYoung said:
OK .. lets say FSG agrees with you and have already made the decision to try to get Klopp. So - behind-the-scenes negotiations are an absolute must here - you cant be visibly seen to publicly undermine the existing gaffer.
If you take him at his word (or the reporter), Klopp has indicated he didn't want to make any career decisions until at least November. So you do some discrete wining and dining (and offer him a large truckload full of English Pounds) and hope like hell he commits.
I suppose, for a prize like Klopp, its OK to let the club drift in the wilderness until a better option comes along. If Rodgers manages to beat the side into something resembling quality all the better - Klopp takes over a contending XI.
I think the danger is if Liverpool manage a few good results against some of the league's minnows (are there any?) FSG will be fooled into keeping him.
If Klopp is a possibility I think you go all in.
Bosoxen said:
Was not beating Norwich at home enough evidence to you that even beating the minnows appears to be a tall order at this point? This team is a mess and I'm with DLew and the ever-growing chorus yelling for Rodgers' ouster. He's just not getting it done.
BCsMightyJoeYoung said:
I wasn't disagreeing with DLew at all - I was merely outlining a possible scenario for his replacement. In fact I agree completely with him (and you). But you don't sack him without a viable alternative at hand - and outside of Klopp there doesn't seem to be an obvious candidate. Patience grasshopper.
Bosoxen said:
Oh, I agree completely. Firing coaches midseason is never good - particularly when you don't have a safety net. I was merely pointing out that we're in no danger of Rodgers accidentally turning this mess into a competent club and mucking up any of the theoretical November plans.
Bosoxen said:
Was not beating Norwich at home enough evidence to you that even beating the minnows appears to be a tall order at this point? This team is a mess and I'm with DLew and the ever-growing chorus yelling for Rodgers' ouster. He's just not getting it done.
LiverpoolFC.com shows it as 47-5.jkempa said:They seriously have 46 shots?!?
I think if you're saying that about a coin flip result, you already know the answer.Jeff Van GULLY said:If they lose this match Rodgers has to be out right?
edit: Liverpool wins
DLew On Roids said:I think if you're saying that about a coin flip result, you already know the answer.