Red(s)HawksFan said:
Two years ago, when the team was in the midst of a six game West Coast interleague swing (SF then LA),
Ortiz was taken out of a Wednesday game for "general soreness" attributed to having to play first base on Monday night after a cross-country flight. Last year, he was a
late scratch from the DH spot with calf soreness a couple days after playing two games at 1B.
It's not an assumption. He's simply not conditioned to play regularly in the field where he's on his feet and moving around for 9 innings. He's not getting any younger either, so it's not like it's easy to adapt on the fly to more steady time in the field. No way he could physically hold up to the weak side of a platoon at 1B, and as the LHH in the equation, he'd be expected to carry the strong side to have the idea make any sense.
I understand the references (and that he'd be playing the majority of innings at 1B in a L/R platoon), but those two examples include one that was attributed to a lower back ache from a cross country flight and another concerning "soreness" in his calf after playing at 1B. There's no history that indicates he'd be able to sustain 1B at his age and fitness, even if he had complete days off against LHP (doubtful, since he'd probably end up pinch hitting for Napoli at at some point).
What's the practical downside of a lab test? There are 3:
1. He refuses...because, Ortiz
2. The experiment shows that he can't pull it off...poor fielding as well as hitting
3. He hurts himself and his bat ends up on the DL
Upside?
1. Better offense (addition by subtraction, particularly against RHP)
2. Better defense down the spectrum (Ramirez off the field)
3. More LHH in the lineup
4. Papi gets to talk to a hell of a lot more players during the game
Won't belabor this because I appreciate that if it were at all viable, at least one other person or writer in the world would have suggested it by now.