Shot clock reset to 20 on a backcourt violation.This is the shot clock issue I was talking about.
Here's when the ref blew the whistle and the clock stopped on the NW backcourt violation. 47.9 on the game clock and the shot clock should be reset to 30 for FAU since it’s a change of possession at this point.
View attachment 79819
And here's when the ref blew the whistle for the timeout by FAU. 35.4 on the game clock but for some reaskn
View attachment 79820
Why? It's a change of possession. Why should the team that gains possession get gypped 10 seconds just because the turnover is a backcourt violation instead of the other team just throwing the ball out of bounds?Shot clock reset to 20 on a backcourt violation.
Agreed. But Bouie has been sensational this year, gonna give him some slackHave to love the guy that missed 5 in a row doing the "get on my back" gesture when he finally makes one
He's not wrong. UConn will absolutely maul Northwestern.Ok Mr President
I think it’s because the team gets the ball at midcourt instead of under the basket. No need for the 10 seconds to advance to the frontcourt. It does hurt in a scenario today with Florida Atlantic wanting to milk more clock.Why? It's a change of possession. Why should the team that gains possession get gypped 10 seconds just because the turnover is a backcourt violation instead of the other team just throwing the ball out of bounds?
So the other team loses the ball one foot on the other side of half court and they get the full 30 seconds, but if it's a backcourt violation they only get 20 seconds?I think it’s because the team gets the ball at midcourt instead of under the basket. No need for the 10 seconds to advance to the frontcourt. It does hurt in a scenario today with Florida Atlantic wanting to milk more clock.
I'll respond with a serious answer, but also at the risk of "wokeness" allegations, note that "gypped" is not really a word that needs to be in anyone's vocabulary.Why? It's a change of possession. Why should the team that gains possession get gypped 10 seconds just because the turnover is a backcourt violation instead of the other team just throwing the ball out of bounds?
Stetson is all hat no horse.Stetson is gonna beat these guys by 40.
At the risk of sounding even more like an idiot, I have no idea why that word is wrong. Forgive me if I offended you or anyone else here.I'll respond with a serious answer, but also at the risk of "wokeness" allegations, note that "gypped" is not really a word that needs to be in anyone's vocabulary.
This doesn't look like a change of possession situation. It looks like it's about the offensive team retaining (offensive rebound or held ball situation where the arrow points their way) or gaining possession (gaining would be like on an offensive rebound where nobody technically has possession), not when the defensive team gains possession in the other team's half of the court.Moving on -- here's the NCAA's rationale for the rule change.
To amend Rule 2-11.6 by providing that the shot clock shall be reset to 20 seconds or the time remaining as set forth in subsections c. and d. of this rule when the offensive team retains or gains possession of the ball for a throw-in in the front court. Exception: When no reset is required per Rule 2-11.6.a or there is a change of team possession in the backcourt and the ball remains live. To accomplish this objective, the change would further require that Rule 2-11.6.b.8 only be applicable when the alternating possession arrow favors the defense. If the arrow favors the offense, there would be a 20-second reset under Rule 2-11.6.c. Rationale: The rule was changed initially last year to 1) increase the pace of play, 2) increase the number of possessions per team and 3) increase scoring. This amendment would correct an omission from last year’s rule and facilitate a clearer understanding of the rule for players, coaches and officials and further encourage the three objectives of this original rule.
It is in that middle ground of words that's not a slur, and it's not really something that most in the U.S. really have much familiarity with, since the Romani are not really a thing here. So, you're not alone. But, you know, if there's another word that works as well, probably a better choice. Others may disagree.At the risk of sounding even more like an idiot, I have no idea why that word is wrong. Forgive me if I offended you or anyone else here.
That's my understanding yes -- front court inbounds after change of possession would be a 20 second clock. But not something I've paid attention to until today!So say, for example, that UConn is full court pressing Northwestern, and Newton knocks the ball out of bounds off a NW player's leg under NW's basket. UConn gains possession in the front court. But now they'd only get 20 seconds for their offensive possession instead of the full 30?
well, nobody during that Northwestern game complained about it, neither the FAU coach, nor the announcers, so you must be right about all of this. It just seems patently unfair that you get a change of possession legitimately, but you only get 20 seconds on the shot clock instead of 30.That's my understanding yes -- front court inbounds after change of possession would be a 20 second clock. But not something I've paid attention to until today!
Maybe the ACC is better than we thought?Nice start by New Mexico, down 30-11. Mountain West representing.
Lol. NO.Anyone else miss Nantz in moments like this?
Right but if they had been left out - or if Pittsburgh had been taken over them like they should have - it could be yet another positive data pointExcept Virginia.
And Dan not happy with the letdown at halftime. Love it. He sounds more like Geno now.UConn looks unbelievable. I know it's just Stetson but man, what an absolute clinic.
If he was unhappy with the last couple of minutes of the first half, he's gotta be even more unhappy about the first few minutes of the second.And Dan not happy with the letdown at halftime. Love it. He sounds more like Geno now.
It's the best of both worlds....playing great but enough on film to get after them about tonight/tomorrow.I love Hurley and I love that he wants to keep the pedal to the metal but I also understand why it's hard to keep intensity redlined in a game like this.
Stetson has made 11 shots in a row. Insanely hot.Lack of focus both on both ends for UConn. Can't just turn it on when you flipped it off sometimes. Hurley probably loves that he can call the execution out