Ok, so, losing out on Stafford by a pick sucked.
Anyways, I'm torn among three players, all of whom have notable warts. Part of me wanted to opt for an a non-QB here, given that the cream of the crop is gone, but I'll admit that I'm concerned ill get stuck with either a complete mediocrity or a gamble if I wait. The position is too important in this league to get stuck without a good player for a few years or so, and, quite frankly, I think the focus on anything past a 3-4 year window is folly. If take Andrew Luck in a second, but any sensible roster-building plan in the NFL implicitly recognizes the transience of the individual player's career and the need to strike while the iron's hot, so to speak.
This is a long way of saying that, with the 20th pick, the Chicago Bears take QB Tony Romo.
Look, his failures are well-documented, and he is coming off a down year production-wise. I see this guy with level eyes. That said, he's a legitimately good NFL QB, he's tough, he's, in my estimation, got a few years of high-quality play left in the tank, and a change of scenery - and a competent offensive staff - could do him some good. I don't know if he can lead the Bears to a title, but I wouldn't count him out. How many other QB couldn't get it done until, well, they did? I'm willing to bet on Romo figuring it out - hopefully I can give him the necessary supporting cast.