Thanksgiving Week Game Thread

EricFeczko

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 26, 2014
4,851
I think what's he's saying is that if we eliminated the salary cap there might be more of a divide between the have's and have not's but we'd at least have a few "good" teams this year, as opposed to a shitload of mediocrity. It isn't a bad point.
Well, we don't have a shitload of mediocrity this year, we have a few good teams, the remainder appear evenly divided between mediocre and shitty. Below is a distribution of winning percentage across the league:
windist.png
You can see from here that more than a third of the league has won less than 40 percent of their games. Roughly the same number have won between 40 and 60 percent, and seven have won 60 percent or more.
Now, it is true that scoring is mostly mediocre, and is even skewed towards more points; below is the distribution of points for:

pfdist.png

As we can see, more than half the league is between 200 and 250 points scored. Only three teams have scored fewer than 200 points, while 12 teams have scored more than 250 points. The problem is in points allowed:

padist.png

This is a skewed distribution, where If we take the same criteria where we identified the range comprising half the league, only nine teams have allowed between 200 and 250 points. 17 teams have allowed more than 250 points, while only 6 teams have allowed fewer than 200 points.

In other words, more teams give up 250 points or more than score 250 points or more. Naturally, this leads to an effect where more teams have negative point differentials:
pddist.png

Again, we see that there are a few very good teams, and an equal number of mediocre/awful teams.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Terrible pick by the Rapist there. Momentum shifting.
I'd still take him over anyone not names Brady or Rodgers. And the Steelers sure do know how to get him pass catchers. If the Steelers could defend the pass. They would be a nightmare.
 

EricFeczko

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 26, 2014
4,851
I'd still take him over anyone not names Brady or Rodgers. And the Steelers sure do know how to get him pass catchers. If the Steelers could defend the pass. They would be a nightmare.
I don't know. I could be persuaded to take Brees or Rivers over Ben, but it is very close.

EDIT: I'd take Romo over all three, if Romo didn't have injury concerns.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Ben goes right for the end zone here if they keep the ball.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Simms -- Timmons is always right.

"The speed of these LBs"

Time to fellate.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
At this moment, all my past accomplishments mean nothing.

That would be right Eli.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,773
I hate the Steelers but that's a shit call right there.
Well the Steelers once beat the Patriots in a playoff game because the Pats held up on hitting their QB on his way out of bounds only he turned right and kept going so screw them.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,865
Well, we don't have a shitload of mediocrity this year, we have a few good teams, the remainder appear evenly divided between mediocre and shitty. Below is a distribution of winning percentage across the league:
View attachment 1015
You can see from here that more than a third of the league has won less than 40 percent of their games. Roughly the same number have won between 40 and 60 percent, and seven have won 60 percent or more.
Now, it is true that scoring is mostly mediocre, and is even skewed towards more points; below is the distribution of points for:

View attachment 1017

As we can see, more than half the league is between 200 and 250 points scored. Only three teams have scored fewer than 200 points, while 12 teams have scored more than 250 points. The problem is in points allowed:

View attachment 1018

This is a skewed distribution, where If we take the same criteria where we identified the range comprising half the league, only nine teams have allowed between 200 and 250 points. 17 teams have allowed more than 250 points, while only 6 teams have allowed fewer than 200 points.

In other words, more teams give up 250 points or more than score 250 points or more. Naturally, this leads to an effect where more teams have negative point differentials:
View attachment 1019

Again, we see that there are a few very good teams, and an equal number of mediocre/awful teams.
You flip a bunch of coins 16 times in a row, and count heads as wins, you'll get some really "good" coins.

Im talking about when I watch the games, the levels of incompetence seem very high. Compared to the days of yore. Maybe I'm just grumpy.

But, I don't feel the same way about the NBA. The level of play in the NBA recently has been outstanding. The rosters are way smaller and the talent pool is way deeper than the NFL, I only bring it up to say I don't think I'm just pining for the olden days.