Mauf, I think you're right. That play was no different than a screen pass. Blocking downfield is legal on a pass behind the LOS.
Nope.Deathofthebambino said:Mauf, I think you're right. That play was no different than a screen pass. Blocking downfield is legal on a pass behind the LOS.
That's legal because the blocking is done in the backfield as well.Deathofthebambino said:Mauf, I think you're right. That play was no different than a screen pass. Blocking downfield is legal on a pass behind the LOS.
From Wikipedia:Ed Hillel said:There can in the NFL. It's only negated if the action is behind the LoS.
http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/passinterference
It's not a model of clarity, but I've never seen OPI called downfield on a throw behind the line, and I'm not sure the NFL intended to adopt a different rule than at other levels of football.Pass interference rules in American high school and college football clearly cover only forward passes that travel beyond the neutral zone. In the NFL, the official rule is that "there can be no pass interference at or behind the line of scrimmage".
Deathofthebambino said:Mauf, I think you're right. That play was no different than a screen pass. Blocking downfield is legal on a pass behind the LOS.
Yeah that's where I have these teams ratedEd Hillel said:I think those are his power rankings. For now, I agree, but we'll know more in about a month after a lot of these teams play each other.
The pass was forward, even though he caught it behind the LoS.Cabin Mirror said:It's basically a run play right? If the pass is backwards, it's the equivalent of a pitch or hand off, therefore the WRs are allowed to block defenders.
Seems odd at first, but I think it's fairly clear on second thought. If they meant to say there couldn't be OPI on a pass behind the LoS, they'd say that language. When they say there can be no PI, it's in reference to the act itself.maufman said:From Wikipedia:
It's not a model of clarity, but I've never seen OPI called downfield on a throw behind the line, and I'm not sure the NFL intended to adopt a different rule than at other levels of football.
Keep in mind, you would have to interfere with the defender's ability to intercept the ball, not merely his ability to make a tackle after the catch -- that's not PI. So I don't think there was OPI on the play that started this conversation, no matter how the rule is interpreted.Ed Hillel said:Seems odd at first, but I think it's fairly clear on second thought. If they meant to say there couldn't be OPI on a pass behind the LoS, they'd say that language. When they say there can be no PI, it's in reference to the act itself.
Not so:maufman said:Keep in mind, you would have to interfere with the defender's ability to intercept the ball, not merely his ability to make a tackle after the catch -- that's not PI. So I don't think there was OPI on the play that started this conversation, no matter how the rule is interpreted.
http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/passinterferenceActions that constitute offensive pass interference include but are not limited to:
(a) Blocking downfield by an offensive player prior to the ball being touched.
Ed Hillel said:The pass was forward, even though he caught it behind the LoS.
BigSoxFan said:What does the SF defense do well?
Here the NFL VP of Officiating gives examples of OPI, and the example at 1:10 is a pass behind the LOS:maufman said:Keep in mind, you would have to interfere with the defender's ability to intercept the ball, not merely his ability to make a tackle after the catch -- that's not PI. So I don't think there was OPI on the play that started this conversation, no matter how the rule is interpreted.
With Willis, Bowman and Aldon Smith out, I guess not much.BigSoxFan said:What does the SF defense do well?
Wait whatEd Hillel said:Brandon Lloyd refused a paycut to 2.5 million with the Pats, took a year off to film a zombie movie, then came back for less than a million bucks. Strange guy.
Crabtree is sorry ass? Does Seattle have anyone better?DanoooME said:That's what happens when you throw to a sorry-ass receiver like Crabtree.
Al Zarilla said:Crabtree is sorry ass? Does Seattle have anyone better?
Are there any NFL coaches that wouldn't have?Ed Hillel said:Belichick would have too, so I can't laugh too hard.
Riverboat Ron?Super Nomario said:Are there any NFL coaches that wouldn't have?
Well, Crab has no speed, and I thought, nevermind.DanoooME said:
Jeez, you'd think coming from me it would be an obvious joke.
Mystic Merlin said:They didn't have a video of him shitting his pants at age 4?