Week 7 Game Thread

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,128
Mauf, I think you're right.  That play was no different than a screen pass.  Blocking downfield is legal on a pass behind the LOS.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,501
Here
I'm looking forward to all the "San Fran Locker Room Falling Apart!?" stories after tonight.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,799
Oregon
For a guy whose teams get as much apparent help from the officials as some believe, you'd think he'd have won more than one Super Bowl
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,501
Here
Deathofthebambino said:
Mauf, I think you're right.  That play was no different than a screen pass.  Blocking downfield is legal on a pass behind the LOS.
That's legal because the blocking is done in the backfield as well.

Any block past the LoS before the receiver touches the ball is OPI. On that play, Welker was blocking before Manning threw it, and the other two blocked before the ball hit the WR's hands.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 22, 2008
36,187
Ed Hillel said:
There can in the NFL. It's only negated if the action is behind the LoS.


http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/passinterference
From Wikipedia:

Pass interference rules in American high school and college football clearly cover only forward passes that travel beyond the neutral zone. In the NFL, the official rule is that "there can be no pass interference at or behind the line of scrimmage".
It's not a model of clarity, but I've never seen OPI called downfield on a throw behind the line, and I'm not sure the NFL intended to adopt a different rule than at other levels of football.
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
47,139
Hartford, CT
Is Collinsworth suggesting that other QBs would have been sipping lemonade and looking around in the stands after that TD?
 
It's not enough to praise him legitimately; they need to invent distinguishing attributes for him.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Ed Hillel said:
I think those are his power rankings. For now, I agree, but we'll know more in about a month after a lot of these teams play each other.
Yeah that's where I have these teams rated
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,501
Here
Cabin Mirror said:
It's basically a run play right? If the pass is backwards, it's the equivalent of a pitch or hand off, therefore the WRs are allowed to block defenders.
The pass was forward, even though he caught it behind the LoS.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,799
Oregon
The way this is going, the Cardinals should have a two-game lead in the loss column already
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,501
Here
maufman said:
From Wikipedia:


It's not a model of clarity, but I've never seen OPI called downfield on a throw behind the line, and I'm not sure the NFL intended to adopt a different rule than at other levels of football.
Seems odd at first, but I think it's fairly clear on second thought. If they meant to say there couldn't be OPI on a pass behind the LoS, they'd say that language. When they say there can be no PI, it's in reference to the act itself.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,501
Here
SEe, that was legal by Welker. He intentionally waited for Thomas to catch it before throwing the block.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 22, 2008
36,187
Ed Hillel said:
Seems odd at first, but I think it's fairly clear on second thought. If they meant to say there couldn't be OPI on a pass behind the LoS, they'd say that language. When they say there can be no PI, it's in reference to the act itself.
Keep in mind, you would have to interfere with the defender's ability to intercept the ball, not merely his ability to make a tackle after the catch -- that's not PI. So I don't think there was OPI on the play that started this conversation, no matter how the rule is interpreted.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,501
Here
maufman said:
Keep in mind, you would have to interfere with the defender's ability to intercept the ball, not merely his ability to make a tackle after the catch -- that's not PI. So I don't think there was OPI on the play that started this conversation, no matter how the rule is interpreted.
Not so:

Actions that constitute offensive pass interference include but are not limited to:

(a) Blocking downfield by an offensive player prior to the ball being touched.
http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/passinterference
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,025
Mansfield MA
maufman said:
Keep in mind, you would have to interfere with the defender's ability to intercept the ball, not merely his ability to make a tackle after the catch -- that's not PI. So I don't think there was OPI on the play that started this conversation, no matter how the rule is interpreted.
Here the NFL VP of Officiating gives examples of OPI, and the example at 1:10 is a pass behind the LOS:
 
https://screen.yahoo.com/nfl-highlights/offensive-pass-interference-call-correct-002906145.html
 
Pretty definitive: you're not allowed allowed to block downfield before the ball is caught on a forward pass.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,501
Here
Brandon Lloyd refused a paycut to 2.5 million with the Pats, took a year off to film a zombie movie, then came back for less than a million bucks. Strange guy.
 

Dollar

Member
SoSH Member
May 5, 2006
11,202
Great job the 49ers getting that play off before the challenge.  And better job by the NBC production crew in not playing the relevant replay until after that play had already been run.
 
and yes, my online feed is a few minutes slow.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 22, 2008
36,187
The probabilities were close to break-even there (assuming you think they only had a 30-40% chance to convert), so I'm sympathetic to the argument that you couldn't tolerate having a 90-yard drive that resulted in no points.