What does Red Sox starting pitching look like in 2024?

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,415
I was going to do one mega-post on 2024, but if this is any indicator, it would be wayyyyyyyy too long.

Starting Pitching
Brayan Bello - Pre-Arb - 3.99 xFIP
Chris Sale - $25.6m AAV in '24 with a club option for $20m in '25 - 3.61 xFIP
Kutter Crawford - Pre-Arb - 4.13 xFIP
Tanner Houck - Pre-Arb - 3.81 xFIP
Garrett Whitlock - $4.7 AAV with club options in '27 & '28 - 3.86 xFIP
Nick Pivetta - Arb 3, earned $5.4m this season - 3.86 xFIP
Chris Murphy - Pre-Arb - 3.85 xFIP

Others on the 40:
Bryan Mata - Injured this season, hopefully will be returning soon
Brandon Walter - Pre-Arb - 5.39 xFIP

Eligible for Rule 5:
Luis Perales (my #4 Red Sox prospect) - 3.00 ERA & 4.05 xFIP in A+ - should need protecting.
Wikelman Gonzalez (#9) - 1.59 ERA & 3.40 xFIP in AA - should need protecting.
Shane Drohan (#16) - 5.80 ERA & 5.79 xFIP in AAA - should need protecting.
Angel Bastardo (#22) - 3.90 ERA & 3.48 xFIP in A+ - might need protecting.
Juan Daniel Encarnacion (#43) - 5.31 ERA & 5.10 xFIP in A+ - should not need protecting.
Grant Gambrell (#47) - 3.12 ERA & 3.54 xFIP in AA - might need protecting, reminds me of Thad Ward in some ways.
Brian Van Belle (#51) - 6.41 ERA & 4.58 xFIP in AAA - might not be worth protecting, but is close to Major League ready.
Chih-Jung ("C.J.") Liu (#58) - 5.02 ERA & 3.58 xFIP in AA - should not need protecting, they might like him more than me.
Gabriel Jackson (#117) - 3.18 ERA & 4.49 xFIP in A - does not need protecting.

Older Minor Leaguers:
Kyle Barraclough (33 y/o) - 2.75 ERA & 5.53 xFIP in AAA - purchased from Independent Ball 6/19/23, not sure of status for next year.
Dinelson Lamet (31 y/o) - 3.72 ERA & 4.53 xFIP in AAA - signed as a Minor League free agent 6/28/23, not sure of status for next year.

Options:
Corey Kluber - 5.77 xFIP - The Red Sox have a club option for $11m next year which we can safely agree that they will decline.

Our Free Agents:
James Paxton - 3.55 xFIP - Paxton is eligible to receive a Qualifying Offer of approximately $20m for one season. If he rejects the QO & signs with another team, we would get a compensation pick after the 2nd round (as we are under the tax threshold). He could also accept the QO or re-sign after rejecting it.

Some Available Free Agents:
Shohei Ohtani - 3.52 xFIP
Yoshinobu Yamamoto - 1.67 ERA in Japan
Julio Urias - 4.38 xFIP
Aaron Nola - 3.82 xFIP
Luis Severino - 5.06 xFIP
Blake Snell - 3.60 xFIP
Clayton Kershaw - 3.28 xFIP
Lucas Giolito - 4.42 xFIP
Frankie Montas - 3.61 xFIP (2022)
Jack Flaherty - 4.46 xFIP
Jordan Montgomery - 4.11 xFIP
Martin Perez - 5.23 xFIP
Carlos Carrasco - 4.94 xFIP
Michael Lorenzen - 4.22 xFIP
Noah Syndergaard - 4.92 xFIP
Sonny Gray - 3.83 xFIP
Kenta Maeda - 3.83 xFIP
Rich Hill - 4.71 xFIP
Hyun Jin Ryu - 3.94 xFIP (2021)
Zack Greinke - 4.46 xFIP
Tyler Mahle - 4.03 xFIP (2022)
Jake Odorizzi - 4.70 xFIP (2022)
Alex Wood - 5.29 xFIP

Potential Free Agents:
Eduardo Rodriguez - 3.62 xFIP - Has an opt out or can opt into 3/$49m.
Marcus Stroman - 3.79 xFIP - $21m player option.
Charlie Morton - 4.09 xFIP - $20m team option.
Seth Lugo - 3.52 xFIP - $7.5m player option.
Lance Lynn - 4.04 xFIP - $18m team option.
Kyle Hendricks - 4.55 xFIP - $16m team option.
Ross Stripling - 3.82 xFIP - $15m player option.
Andrew Heaney - 4.45 xFIP - $13m player option.
Alex Cobb - 3.34 xFIP - $10m team option.
German Marquez - 3.48 xFIP - $16m team option.
Johnny Cueto - 4.79 xFIP - $10.5m team option.
Sean Manaea - 3.98 xFIP - $12.5m player option.
Michael Wacha - 4.62 xFIP - mutual option (it's complicated).
Mike Clevinger - 5.40 xFIP - mutual option ($12m with $4m buyout).

My Overall Thoughts:
We have a lot of returning options next year, but seem to be lacking at least 1 more top of the rotation starter. The Red Sox can have a payroll of approximately $280m next year without suffering anything other than economic penalties, & I would expect them to be not too far from that #. I believe that gives them about $80m or $90m to spend on free agency this year, & they have very few holes to fill.

Adding 1 (or maybe 2) high end starters who cost just money makes a ton of sense. My first choice is Yoshinobu Yamamoto.

I would like to see Paxton sign a long-term deal somewhere else & bring back a 2nd round comp pick.

We already have a lot of starting pitchers on our 40-man, & as well as several we will likely need to protect, even though they are mostly further away from being able to help the team. In order to get around this, we will hopefully be able to trade some people. Other teams obviously have their own 40-man issues, but a player like Brandon Walter who has had "success" in the Majors (3.07 ERA/5.39 xFIP) could be worth a further away flyer or two, and I do not really see him as someone with a place on next year's 40-man roster.

I could also see them moving on from a Houck, Whitlock, Crawford, Pivetta, or Sale if the price is right, especially if they add a front-line starter or two in free agency.

They could trade for a starter this off season, but I really don't see much point with some of the options on the open market & the budget available - unless it's something where they're clearing out like 5 40-man guys for 1, but most teams don't have that kind of room anyway.

My 1st guess at next year's rotation...

Bello
Yoshinobu
Sale
Houck
Crawford

But I expect to be wrong.
 
Last edited:

jbupstate

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2022
617
New York, USA
Starting Pitching
Brayan Bello - Pre-Arb - 3.99 xFIP
Chris Sale - $25.6m AAV in '24 with a club option for $20m in '25 - 3.61 xFIP
Kutter Crawford - Pre-Arb - 4.13 xFIP
Tanner Houck - Pre-Arb - 3.81 xFIP
Garrett Whitlock - $4.7 AAV with club options in '27 & '28 - 3.86 xFIP
Nick Pivetta - Arb 3, earned $5.4m this season - 3.86 xFIP
Chris Murphy - Pre-Arb - 3.85 xFIP
I am not a well versed on xFIP but my understanding is it better reflects pitching performance by normalizing defense.

I understand we have high hopes for Bello… but why do we dream on him and discount the abilities of the other pitchers on this list with lower xFIP?

fake edit: If the Sox had been able to close the deal on Zack Eflin we would be in great shape. Too bad he’s from Florida
 

Sin Duda

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
848
(B)Austin Texas
Excellent work, JM3! Help me uunderstand your ideas on Rule 5 protection for A+ pitchers. Have teams occasionally plucked them from their original teams and kept them all season in the bigs?
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,415
I am not a well versed on xFIP but my understanding is it better reflects pitching performance by normalizing defense.

I understand we have high hopes for Bello… but why do we dream on him and discount the abilities of the other pitchers on this list with lower xFIP?
xFIP is usually the best for predicting future success of the easily accessible advanced metrics. It tends to undervalue ground ball heavy pitchers like Bello, though. It normalizes defense & home run rates. Bello is also only 24.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,415
Excellent work, JM3! Help me uunderstand your ideas on Rule 5 protection for A+ pitchers. Have teams occasionally plucked them from their original teams and kept them all season in the bigs?
Well, I think to some extent it's a bit overblown...like I was told that we had to trade Blalock or lose him for free, & he had moved from A to A+ this season & I don't think he particularly needed to be protected.

As far as Perales goes, he has the best stuff in the entire system. He needs to harness his control, but he's only 20 & if I was another team I would 100% carry him on the roster next year if I had to. If a team can carry a low-upside guy like Thad Ward all season, you absolutely do it with a high upside guy whose stuff is electric.

Bastardo has had a really good A+ season...for the most part. I personally don't think I would protect him, but it's at least debatable. He's a high strikeout guy & is only 21.

I don't think any other A+ guy needs protecting, but Wikelman has moved up to AA & his stuff still plays, including being part of a combined no hitter.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,415
Gambrell? Is he too far down the prospect list to consider protecting?
Good call on Grant Gambrell. I accidentally skimmed past him on the list. He has a 3.12 ERA & 3.54 xFIP in AA & is kind of Thad Ward'ish in some ways. He turns 26 in November & is fairly low-ceiling, but is a competent pitcher who knows what he's doing. I have him ranked #47.

Definitely a decision to be made there.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
15,415
Updated the OP to include Gambrell & several more free agents & potential free agents for completeness.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
I understand we have high hopes for Bello… but why do we dream on him and discount the abilities of the other pitchers on this list with lower xFIP?
Bello's numbers were affected a bit by three poor (statistical) games to start with as he ramped back up after his spring injury setback. You then get two months of all-star pitching, then a slight leveling off since then, which is fairly routine and maybe to be expected as he finishes off his first full ML season. So his numbers are more like a floor, or at least a small sample.

I too would love to see them prioritize Yamamoto, the upside sounds exciting, although how he transitions over to the US is always a risk factor.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,294
Bello's numbers were affected a bit by three poor (statistical) games to start with as he ramped back up after his spring injury setback. You then get two months of all-star pitching, then a slight leveling off since then, which is fairly routine and maybe to be expected as he finishes off his first full ML season. So his numbers are more like a floor, or at least a small sample.

I too would love to see them prioritize Yamamoto, the upside sounds exciting, although how he transitions over to the US is always a risk factor.
Yamamoto is my guy. I want the full court press on him. He’s a better pitcher than Kodai Senga and Senga has transitioned just fine. We obviously have had a great experience with Yoshida so far as well. Feels to me like the elite Japanese talent are becoming somewhat safer bets. He’s a few years away but Roki Sasaki has a 1.48 ERA and has given up 1 HR in 85 IP. As a 21 year-old. Japan is churning out some insane talent and I hope Chaim stays active there.
 

JBJ_HOF

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2014
540
Chaim Bloom was on the ITM podcast tonight. He said he expects a starting pitcher to be the big focus in the off season and when the young pitchers have come along like they have, it makes it easier to narrow the focus on pitchers from the outside they want to pursue.
 

Merkle's Boner

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2011
3,837
Depending on how the 40-man shakes out, I would consider leaving Drohan off of it. Certainly instead of Perales or Bastardo. How many guys can you lose to Rule 5? Is it only 1 per year?
 

Tokyo Sox

Baka Gaijin
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 16, 2006
6,171
There
Yamamoto is my guy. I want the full court press on him. He’s a better pitcher than Kodai Senga and Senga has transitioned just fine. We obviously have had a great experience with Yoshida so far as well. Feels to me like the elite Japanese talent are becoming somewhat safer bets.
It will shock no one to learn that this is also what I'm hoping for. Yamamoto has been NPB's most polished pitching product for the last several years now, and I agree is better than Senga, not to mention a lot younger. He's also Yoshida's ex-Orix teammate so hopefully the Sox have a slight edge over the competition there.

Another name to perhaps add to the "potential free agents" list is the guy who started the WBC Final for Japan, Shota Imanaga. He's 5 years older than Yamamoto but has gotten better each of the last three seasons, currently pitching to a 1.99 ERA / 0.85 WHIP line in 14 starts this year.

Minor technical point but neither Yamamoto nor Imanaga are actual FA's though, they would both need to be posted. But there shouldn't be any roadblocks there; the teams will post them if they want to go.
 

The Gray Eagle

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
16,919
If we're going to have a deep system filled with interesting prospects, we're going to have to adjust to leaving plenty of them exposed to the rule 5 draft and losing one or two most every year.

Perales and Wikelman look like 2 who I would protect, but the others seems kind of long shots to be protected, or at least guys who if they are taken will probably end up doing nothing because their development would be hurt from being rushed to the majors. Bastardo is still in A ball, Drohan has had some amazing games but doesn't look anywhere near ready for the majors yet, and CJ Liu is like a similar but lesser version of Drohan.

The only reason losing Ward bothered me this past offseason was because our system wasn't yet deep, and we exposed him instead of Brasier and Ort. But in the long run, it won't make much difference as he probably won't end up doing anything, the system is now deeper anyway, and we will probably lose another unproven but interesting player or two this year.

If at some point we do lose a player in the rule 5 draft who has a decent career for some other team, we will never hear the end of it though. From the media ("Why can't WE get players like that?" "It's Bagwell all over again!!") the many Bloom-hating fans, prospect lovers, and GM wannabees who get enraged if the team doesn't get their imaginary "full value" from every single player in the organization in every move.

That would be a strange alliance if that happens, but it will just be noise, and I am glad that our front office doesn't seem to care about noise like that. We'll likely lose a player or 2 this offseason but we'll have plenty more who will still be here and not taking up crucial roster spots.

Hopefully we protect the right ones.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,355
Excellent point. I think you also have to consider the potential cost to the big league team of having multiple 40-man roster spots taken up by players who aren’t able to help right away. Obviously there’s a balance but you are going to need players ready to be called up as needed, which can be made more difficult if you have too many spots being taken by lower level prospects.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,505
Also hoping for Yamamoto, who expectations should be set for him to be a middle of the rotation guy, despite his insane numbers. I'm not sure if Bello is truly "ace" material but with Sale, I think it's a group of very good starters that would be a top rotation despite possibly not having a true ace.
My concern, of course.... is with Sale's health for a whole season, as I'm sure is everyone else's too, so I wonder if they should also move to get one of the lower tiered guys who may be available for a 3/$60M range.... or to try and make a deal for ERod (who I suspect wouldn't be as adverse to a trade back to Boston as he was to LA.... strangely enough).
I think Pivetta should get packaged and traded (please someone take Dalbec... he's got no future here and needs another legit shot at a full time job). It was crazy that in the beginning of this season, the "depth" looked absolutely impressive and very deep and yet by early July they had 3 starters, none of which were in the rotation to start the season.
I think it's also past the time to try Whitlock as a regular starter. So.... rotation would look like:

Sale
Bello
Yamamoto
Crawford
ERod
Houck

with:
Drohan (AAA)
Walters (AAA)
Murphy (long relief)
Whitlock (in case of absolute emergencies but mostly as a 3 inning opener)
as the deep depth and I can see Winkelman possibly getting a call up or at least up during expanded roster time
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,545
deep inside Guido territory
I would like them to go out and sign Yamamoto and also one of Blake Snell/Julio Urias/Aaron Nola if any of those three hit the market. Move Whitlock and Houck back to the bullpen. Let Paxton go for a draft pick.

Snell
Yamamoto
Bello
Sale
Crawford

Bullpen
RHP's
Jansen
Martin
Winckowski
Whitlock
Houck

LHP's
Bernandino
Bleier or Jacques
 

Sin Duda

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
848
(B)Austin Texas
By the way, Rule 5 draft loss Thad Ward hasn't done so well for the Nats: 7.12 ERA, 30.1 IP, 1.65 WHIP. This year probably has stunted his development. Ol' Thaddeus is already 26 and will likely get sent back to AAA next season but in the Nats' system.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
Chaim Bloom was on the ITM podcast tonight. He said he expects a starting pitcher to be the big focus in the off season and when the young pitchers have come along like they have, it makes it easier to narrow the focus on pitchers from the outside they want to pursue.
It really does feel like 2024 is the hit the gas year a lot of us suspected it would be. Which jibes with a lot of the prioritization of pitcher development (and other things) this year. That plus the room under the LT all set the Sox up to make the huge difference-maker rotation acquisition they need above all else.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
By the way, Rule 5 draft loss Thad Ward hasn't done so well for the Nats: 7.12 ERA, 30.1 IP, 1.65 WHIP. This year probably has stunted his development. Ol' Thaddeus is already 26 and will likely get sent back to AAA next season but in the Nats' system.
Apparently we should know today if Song cleared waivers. Speaking of Rule 5 exits we were so worried about last winter.
 

OldeBeanTowne

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
1,178
What's the thinking on what Yamamoto will cost? Will it require a better contract than Tanaka's record-setting seven year $155 million deal?
 

Yaz4Ever

MemBer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2004
11,294
MA-CA-RI-AZ-NC
I'm hoping to see us go after Yamamoto.

Sale
Bello
Yamamoto
Paxton
Crawford
Houck

Having Crawford/Houck in that rotation ready to take over due to injury (Sale and Paxton obviously have histories, but anyone can get hurt) or stretched out for long relief in the pen. Barring injuries or if one of our more likely injured guys moves on, I wouldn't be heart broken to see Houck assume the closer's role
 

Yaz4Ever

MemBer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2004
11,294
MA-CA-RI-AZ-NC
Anyone counting on Sale for more than 10 starts next year is in a Dock Ellis-like trip.
I'll be honest and admit I'm hoping for (not necessarily counting on) 15-20 starts from Sale and the same from Paxton (if he's still with us).
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,263
What's the thinking on what Yamamoto will cost? Will it require a better contract than Tanaka's record-setting seven year $155 million deal?
Much more IMO, pretty curious to see how his and Urias’ eventual deals compare.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,405
Yamamoto has been better than Tanaka at the same age in Japan, and we have a decade of regular salary inflation plus the Steve Cohen factor. I think he's getting $200m at least.
 

OldeBeanTowne

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
1,178
That's what I assumed. Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if he gets a contract that exceeds $30 million a year over 7-8 years or possibly a longer contract to reduce the AAV. Given the teams that will be involved and the other FA pitching options available, I think it may take more than I'm even expecting.

All that said, get it done Theo!
 

burstnbloom

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2005
2,761
I would be really surprised if his contract was that large. Its difficult to imagine that kind of inflation over last year. The contracts for players coming from Japan have been very reasonable.

Yoshida - 5 years $90m
Senga - 5 for $75m
Suzuki - 5 for $85m

Is a 5'10" pitcher going to get 5 x $150? I guess we will find out but Ill believe it when I see it.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,405
The biggest immediate difference is their age. Tanaka and Yamataka are both posting after their age 24 seasons; the other guys came over significantly later.

In the year before posting:
Tanaka (24): 27 starts (24 W, 0 L, 8 CG), 212 IP, 1.27 ERA, 0.943 WHIP, 0.3 HR/9
Senga (29): 22 starts (11 W, 6 L, 1 CG), 148 IP, 1.94 ERA, 1.041 WHIP, 0.4 HR/9

I'd stated earlier that Yamataka had better stats than Tanaka, and I think that's true overall but I'd forgotten what a monster season Tanaka had before he posted. Yoshinobu is currently sitting at a 1.57 ERA with a 0.852 WHIP and an insane 8.64 SO/W ratio though.
 

Philip Jeff Frye

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 23, 2001
10,299
James Paxton - 3.55 xFIP - Paxton is eligible to receive a Qualifying Offer of approximately $20m for one season. If he rejects the QO & signs with another team, we would get a compensation pick after the 2nd round (as we are under the tax threshold). He could also accept the QO or re-sign after rejecting it.
Do people think that the Sox will offer Paxton the QO? They didn't do so last year with Wacha. Seems like 2023 Paxton is not too different than 2022 Wacha - FIP of 4.07 versus 4.14, about the same age, somewhat similar histories of battling injuries.
 
Last edited:

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,405
Depends on how he performs down the stretch. Yesterday's Paxton doesn't get one.
 

Tokyo Sox

Baka Gaijin
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 16, 2006
6,171
There
The biggest immediate difference is their age. Tanaka and Yamataka are both posting after their age 24 seasons; the other guys came over significantly later.

In the year before posting:
Tanaka (24): 27 starts (24 W, 0 L, 8 CG), 212 IP, 1.27 ERA, 0.943 WHIP, 0.3 HR/9
Senga (29): 22 starts (11 W, 6 L, 1 CG), 148 IP, 1.94 ERA, 1.041 WHIP, 0.4 HR/9

I'd stated earlier that Yamataka had better stats than Tanaka, and I think that's true overall but I'd forgotten what a monster season Tanaka had before he posted. Yoshinobu is currently sitting at a 1.57 ERA with a 0.852 WHIP and an insane 8.64 SO/W ratio though.
Yamataka tte dare?

This is a strange way for ESPN or an unnamed executive to frame it. Posting fees have gotten much smaller over the years, and don't count towards the luxury tax anyway. Unless you care how much ownership is out of pocket, there is zero reason to care about how much the "entire package" comes to. Whether the actual contract is 5/100 or 8/200 or anywhere in between, the associated posting fees are irrelevant.
 

johnlos

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2014
250
Do people think that the Sox will offer Paxton the QO? They didn't do so last year with Wacha. Seems like 2023 Paxton is not too different than 2022 Wacha - FIP of 4.07 versus 4.14, about the same age, somewhat similar histories of battling injuries.
Yes. Paxton's velo is just as strong as 2017-2019, when he put up a combined 11.6 fWAR.
68788

Dunno what rankings people prefer for pitchers, but for fantasy baseball purposes Nick Pollock puts in as much work as anyone and he has Paxton as 19th right now. Obviously real life is a bit different but he's clearly in the ace conversation and "over"paying on a 1/$20m is generally a team-friendly move. So assuming he finishes the year healthy and matches his performance to this point it's a no-brainer.

Also I figure part of the rationale for not trading him at the deadline was putting the QO on and taking the supplemental pick if he signs elsewhere, since he would have fetched a nice return.
 
Last edited:

cantor44

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2020
1,645
Chicago, IL
It seems to me the Red Sox are 2-3 blue chip players from having a truly contending team (if Bello, Casas, and Duran are what they seem to be). Acquiring a high end starter should be the priority, and it's gratifying that Bloom has said as much. Though it seems to me a serious upgrade is needed at second, or in one of the outfield spots, preferably a RHH. And then, perhaps, they need an additional 3-4 starter. I'd like to see Bloom get aggressive this off season. They've moved closer to the next quality core, the farm is restocked. Surely the time is right.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,735
Rogers Park
It seems to me the Red Sox are 2-3 blue chip players from having a truly contending team (if Bello, Casas, and Duran are what they seem to be). Acquiring a high end starter should be the priority, and it's gratifying that Bloom has said as much. Though it seems to me a serious upgrade is needed at second, or in one of the outfield spots, preferably a RHH. And then, perhaps, they need an additional 3-4 starter. I'd like to see Bloom get aggressive this off season. They've moved closer to the next quality core, the farm is restocked. Surely the time is right.
I think this is basically right.

We are in great long term shape at 3B, 1B, CF, LF/DH, C, and SS. That’s a great start. Rafaela is probably the next outfield upgrade.

But unless Urias really clicks in the next few months, we should be looking for a two-way middle infielder to bridge to the current Sea Dogs.

And another 1/2 starter type.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,666
Miami (oh, Miami!)
It seems to me the Red Sox are 2-3 blue chip players from having a truly contending team (if Bello, Casas, and Duran are what they seem to be). Acquiring a high end starter should be the priority, and it's gratifying that Bloom has said as much. Though it seems to me a serious upgrade is needed at second, or in one of the outfield spots, preferably a RHH. And then, perhaps, they need an additional 3-4 starter. I'd like to see Bloom get aggressive this off season. They've moved closer to the next quality core, the farm is restocked. Surely the time is right.
The question is where those blue chip players will be coming from. The plan for the moment would seem to be bridging to Meyer/Yorke with competent players - maybe Mondesi on a one year "show me" contract or Urias. For the OF, Rafaela is a RHH.

I think a single controlled starter would do it. ?/Bello/Sale/Houck/Crawford/Pivetta.
 

beautokyo

New Member
Jun 5, 2008
277
Tokyo, Japan
Speaking of the devil, I watched him pitch tonight and he threw 7 innings, around 106 pitches, 4 or 5 K's, 1 walk. Quite a few full counts. Busted tough lefthanders inside at 155-158, 127 curve 12-6 that found the strike zone often. More low pitches than high in the zone. It's my 1st time to watch him this year. He doesn't waste any time on the mound either.

Roki Sasaki is another arm to be on the lookout for down the road.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,405
But unless Urias really clicks in the next few months, we should be looking for a two-way middle infielder to bridge to the current Sea Dogs.
Curious who you'd target for this role, as either a free agent this winter or a realistic trade for a couple years of control. Cause I'm really not seeing likely upgrades to Urias anywhere. I think he's our guy.

You could maybe argue for Hoerner from the Cubs or Edman from STL, but both those teams were selling last month and kept them, so I'm not sure that's a likely trade.
 

Merkle's Boner

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2011
3,837
Speaking of the devil, I watched him pitch tonight and he threw 7 innings, around 106 pitches, 4 or 5 K's, 1 walk. Quite a few full counts. Busted tough lefthanders inside at 155-158, 127 curve 12-6 that found the strike zone often. More low pitches than high in the zone. It's my 1st time to watch him this year. He doesn't waste any time on the mound either.

Roki Sasaki is another arm to be on the lookout for down the road.
Is he Sidd Finch?
 

Sin Duda

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
848
(B)Austin Texas
Thanks and sorry for the confusion.....trying to be helpful can be confusing for old dogs sometimes.
No, no. I had started my post before you added the link, but it took me so long to convert, my post followed yours by 3 minutes(one ol' dog to another). Now that I work for Japanese company Renesas, maybe I'll get to travel to Tokyo one day.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,735
Rogers Park
Curious who you'd target for this role, as either a free agent this winter or a realistic trade for a couple years of control. Cause I'm really not seeing likely upgrades to Urias anywhere. I think he's our guy.

You could maybe argue for Hoerner from the Cubs or Edman from STL, but both those teams were selling last month and kept them, so I'm not sure that's a likely trade.
Good question; I’m not sure. I think Urias has the inside track, but there are some other possibilities depending on what other teams do. Ha-Seong Kim is the best case scenario if the Padres blow it up, but guys like Brandon Lowe or Brendan Donovan are maybe more realistic. Or, as you say, Edman. I think the Cubs may have extended Hoerner.