Having Brooks Orpik standing around doing absolutely nothing certainly is an effective way to beat his goalie.reggiecleveland said:That was the only way to beat Quick. Martin Jones is my cousin, but I can't see him becoming a starter in LA.
ForceAtHome said:I'm disappointed in you folks for not having Tim Thomas' falling save on Mike Green in here already.
Greg29fan said:
The Napkin said:That's awesome. Can you get suspended for a hit against your own player?
Marchand's low bridge on the Canuck in the SCF was post-whistle, was it not?Ed Hillel said:Um, holy shit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CFsz3KIEQo
The Lucic hit on Miller gets me every time. The Thomas hit on Sedin is class as well.
catomatic said:Marchand's low bridge on the Canuck in the SCF was post-whistle, was it not?
reggiecleveland said:Strange end to this fight in Quebec semi pro league
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_Z4qd7m1BY
He actually did it twice, the little douche. The one in the Jim Ross video was in the SCF post whistle on one of the Sedins.Dropkick Izzy said:
No. It was also in January, during the first meeting post-SCF with Vancouver.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGD5DbljtfE[/youtube]
Yeah, that's the one I'm thinking of—the SCF one. I think post-whistle move is pretty much ok, though. If someone wants to run you after the whistle is blown then they deserve whatever comes their way. I would feel the same if someone took steps to avoid Lucic on any one of his post-whistle adventures. From the department of who the fuck cares: I was in a bar in Brooklyn watching that game and there was a huge Habs fan behind me who maintained that the whistle had not blown and that it was an unforgivable offense. I took the opposite view and things got quite heated. I told him I still played twice weekly and had some context to speak on the matter but that only ratcheted up his defensiveness—we actually almost took it outside because he was such an embittered douchenozzle about it.Ed Hillel said:He actually did it twice, the little douche. The one in the Jim Ross video was in the SCF post whistle on one of the Sedins.
catomatic said:Yeah, that's the one I'm thinking of—the SCF one. I think post-whistle move is pretty much ok, though. If someone wants to run you after the whistle is blown then they deserve whatever comes their way. I would feel the same if someone took steps to avoid Lucic on any one of his post-whistle adventures. From the department of who the fuck cares: I was in a bar in Brooklyn watching that game and there was a huge Habs fan behind me who maintained that the whistle had not blown and that it was an unforgivable offense. I took the opposite view and things got quite heated. I told him I still played twice weekly and had some context to speak on the matter but that only ratcheted up his defensiveness—we actually almost took it outside because he was such an embittered douchenozzle about it.
Nearly as fast as PK Subban did when Andy Ference was looking to tune him up after the flying elbow to Krejci…...SidelineCameras said:
You fought a Habs fan? At what point did he dive and start looking for the refs?
I watched the one on Salo moments ago and heard Brick very pointedly make note that it was the second low hit of the afternoon. Jack then cited Ballard's low hit earlier that day. It certainly gives context to Marchand's perhaps retaliatory hit afterwards. Brad was just observing "Marchand's low-bridge code."Dropkick Izzy said:I'm not sure how, but I completely forgot Marshand ducking the incoming Sedin. And it was most certainly after the whistle.
AMcGhie said:Is there a specific penalty against the low-check that marchand has thrown a couple times, or does it just fall under the general "roughing" category.
Rule 44 - Clipping
44.1 Clipping - Clipping is the act of throwing the body, from any direction, across or below the knees of an opponent.
A player may not deliver a check in a “clipping” manner, nor lower his own body position to deliver a check on or below an opponent’s knees.
An illegal “low hit” is a check that is delivered by a player or goalkeeper who may or may not have both skates on the ice, with his sole intent to check the opponent in the area of his knees. A player may not lower his body position to deliver a check to an opponent’s knees