I'm curious as to what is tacky about having people you want to consider for the job of announcer doing announcing before you decide who to hire?This is just so tacky. Rarely is anything done tastefully on Yawkey Way any more*.
* There are exceptions, but they're few and far between.
Far be it from me to agree with a Yankee, but Bob Sheppard said it best, "A public-address announcer should be clear, concise, correct," he said. "He should not be colorful, cute or comic."I'm curious as to what is tacky about having people you want to consider for the job of announcer doing announcing before you decide who to hire?
I mean it isn't as if they're announcing at the games "tonight's announcer is..." and making it like a game show. I suppose asking someone publicly like LL did this morning could be considered tacky but Meter's genuine glee, and D&C's knee-jerk skepticism actually made for a cool moment on NESN. The chances of Meter getting the job are probably slim to none but, as Meter put it, he just gave someone the opportunity to check something off his bucket list. That's not something that happens often.
My reaction was quite similar.Why didn't you just say "I just really, really, really, hate John Meterparel"
Offering a local announcer a shot at a tryout for the job on the 2nd rated Sports Talk Radio show in its timeslot isn't exactly a massive publicity stunt. If Meterparel were to do a game tomorrow, it's likely that over 50% of the crowd would have no idea whatsoever. I guess if the Sox turned it into something major I'd be with you, but I really fail to see how Meterparel (or realistically any literate adult) isn't qualified enough to try to read names over a microphone at Sox games. To be honest, given Meterparel's work in the AM and his various college announcing duties, i'm not sure the job isn't actually beneath him, or at least not worth the time commitment.
Why be completely obvious when you can be subtle.Why didn't you just say "I just really, really, really, hate John Meterparel"
Honestly, I don't "hate" John Meterparel. I rarely listen to D&C and I don't know the guy personally, so I don't hate him. However, the reason why he isn't qualified is the same reason why he hasn't moved forward in his announcing career: his voice sucks. Every flash guy on EEI has had their own show or a chance to host when the regular host is out sick. Meterparel hasn't had a weekend gig and very rarely hosts D&C. He also has been the BC voice for a long time and hasn't been mentioned whenever there's an opening anywhere. You would have to think that his lack of talent is holding him back.I guess if the Sox turned it into something major I'd be with you, but I really fail to see how Meterparel (or realistically any literate adult) isn't qualified enough to try to read names over a microphone at Sox games.
It's not a solemn task, that wasn't my point. It's essentially an outdated task and one that ultimately isn't that big of a deal. My point is the marketing/PR bullshit philosophy of the Red Sox where they're turning everything into a "big deal". Just pick a person and move on.I couldn't care less what the Yankees said or did. I actually enjoy the fact that the team is treating this like something fun instead of like some solemn task.
After Carl passed away it has been mentioned how low paying the gig is, like 50 bucks a game low.Until he's eliminated the very real possibility exists that he could get the job. Hard to fathom, really.
Man, that is going to be so much fun! Maybe LL will let Meter grab an AB and he can cross that off his bucket list too.Lucchino also encouraged Meter to feel free to add his own shtick when he has the tryout tomorrow night. This led to Meter wondering aloud if he should announce the Sox players by nicknames and D&C want him to find a way to include his signature "Take a bow!" at least once while doing the PA.
I don't listen to the show, but any chance tha LL was saying that tongue in cheek.Lucchino also encouraged Meter to feel free to add his own shtick when he has the tryout tomorrow night. This led to Meter wondering aloud if he should announce the Sox players by nicknames and D&C want him to find a way to include his signature "Take a bow!" at least once while doing the PA.
Can they really give that job to a guy with a speech impediment?
Am I the only one who notices this? He does this subtle little gulp after every statement.
"Now batting for the Red Sox, (slurp) number 15, (slurp) Dustin Pedroia, (slurp) second base, (slurp) Pedroia."
Chad Finn ‏@GlobeChadFinn
@JohnDennisWEEI I'll retweet you soon, John. Promise. I'll lower my usual standards of looking for something funny or insightful.
In my opinion he seems to be a heavy drinking, fat, over the hill, has been racist who "thinks" he is funny and insightful, only that no one else seems to think so...he is a pathetic jerk. How he is still on the air is amazing to me...again only my opinion...but if looks like a turd, smells like a turd and floats in the tub like a turd...it just might be a turd.John Dennis really seems like quite a dick.
Or a Baby Ruth bar...but if looks like a turd, smells like a turd and floats in the tub like a turd...it just might be a turd.
I love how the evenings show EEI as "Planet Mikey, RedSox, Celtics" at an 11something, I'm sure that is mostly due to Mikey's insightful analysis and not those other two.Chad Finn had a blog today suggesting 'eei is starting to storm back.
http://www.boston.com/sports/touching_all_the_bases/2012/06/strong_may_for_weei_in_ratings.html?camp=miscn:twit:tatb
I'm sure John Dennis will give some credit to Finn for bothering to cover the story.
"It's everyone's fault but mine."So can anyone transcribe what he said?
Shocking. Did Callahan curl his lip, sneer and spit out the word "liberals" as the bane of everyone's existance?"It's everyone's fault but mine."
Essentially.
I am far from this world, so I ask those who understand this stuff --- If I am a startup, should I take it as a bad sign that private investors are 'only' willing to pony up 10-20% of what I personally put into the business? Or is this a 'normal' amount that suggests going forward is OK?Schilling, who founded the company six years ago, said he personally invested more than $50 million in the company, in addition to $5 million to $10 million from other wealthy investors
The great unknown here is how things went with venture capitalists. Curt was on this board at one point venting a bit about not being able to attract a venture capitalist partner. What is unclear is if he never got any venture offers, or got venture offers but simply didnt like the terms because he was being unreasonable [ie didnt want to give up too much control and ownership of the company] or he was unreasonable and being selfish. Without the inside details [like the business case, details of any offers, how the venture capitalists assessed the risk, etc] its very difficult to tell. Without any inside knowledge, I will say that his 'I like video games, but have never run or been involved in such a company' probably didnt get folks pumped up to write a check to fund him.I am far from this world, so I ask those who understand this stuff --- If I am a startup, should I take it as a bad sign that private investors are 'only' willing to pony up 10-20% of what I personally put into the business? Or is this a 'normal' amount that suggests going forward is OK?
Unless we see a forensic audit of 38 Studios, I wouldnt trust any of the numbers that Schilling provides. He can say he put in $50M, and he is tapped out, but considering how willing he was to blame the state of RI for his problems and ask for more money after telling his family the business was going to fail, I think he is looking for sympathy even though he claims otherwise. So while he made a ton during his career, I still want to see how much he truly put into the company before I believe he is tapped out.FWIW -- Acc. to b-ref he grossed about $114M in his career.
Federal taxes ~35%FWIW -- Acc. to b-ref he grossed about $114M in his career.
Depends on exactly what type of deal you are structuring. In a traditional VC round for a startup, whether it's Series A, B, or C, you are traditionally going out and raising your only capital, and that is really the only money that you have to operate on. In those types of situations, you'll typically give away anywhere between a 10-25% stake in the company in exchange for the funding that you need, and you retain the rest of the ownership. The difference here is that Schilling was throwing his own cash on the table at the same time. More than likely, he still wanted to retain somewhere in the range of a 75-80% ownership at this point, simply because he probably expected future dilution of shares as he raised more money, as well as possibly having to exercise options and the like for various high-ranking employees. So the deal structure is not particularly unusual, other than the fact that Schilling actually had capital to invest alongside his VC or angel investors. Not a huge concern there. More concerning should have been the amount of money being spent with little to no track record in the video game industry, which is undergoing some huge changes in its business model right now. Schilling just wasn't in tune with where things are going there, and that was a much bigger problem.I am far from this world, so I ask those who understand this stuff --- If I am a startup, should I take it as a bad sign that private investors are 'only' willing to pony up 10-20% of what I personally put into the business? Or is this a 'normal' amount that suggests going forward is OKFWIW -- Acc. to b-ref he grossed about $114M in his career.
Gotta add back in endorsements etcFederal taxes ~35%
State taxes 3-5%
Meaning his take-home from baseball alone was in the $60M-$70M range. Subtract his house ($5M), other day-to-day expenses, and hopefully college/retirement savings, and the $50M is probably an accurate estimate of his entire life savings.