Week 18 game thread?

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,536
It feels to me like they should get rid of uncatchable. If the assumption is that everything is catchable why have a rule that only leads to confusion.

The penalty for PI is just way too much more significant than the disadvantage caused by the infraction if we are assuming every receiver has super powers. Either make catchability a significant component of the penalty or make it a max 15 yards and automatic first down.
Good luck. We saw what happened after they made PI reviewable. The refs sabotaged it and forced the NFL to scrap that change
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,041
AZ
Good luck. We saw what happened after they made PI reviewable. The refs sabotaged it and forced the NFL to scrap that change
It is already the rule though. It is just administered in a very fucked up way. Either call it or abandon it.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,891
Chargers win, pats pay cincy Steelers are in

Raiders win, pats play Buffalo Steelers are out

Hate to say it but go Raiders. i really want another shot at the bills and would love Big Ben to be done. That said, the absolute best outcome of this game is a tie and if it somehow goes into OT, it is going to be fascinating.
Im surprised by your choice. I would not think the Bills would be your preference. Their pass D can give Mac problems moreso than the other options.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,681
Oregon
Im surprised by your choice. I would not think the Bills would be your preference. Their pass D can give Mac problems moreso than the other options.
I agree. They could lose in Cincinnati as well, but Buffalo is a tough match for them
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,041
AZ
Im surprised by your choice. I would not think the Bills would be your preference. Their pass D can give Mac problems moreso than the other options.
Patriots ain’t winning the Super Bowl.

Taking out the Bills wouldn’t be quite as satisfying as the Red Sox taking out the Yankees this year but same principle.

I guess getting a more winnable game increases the odds of getting Mac a little bit more experience. But there is more potential upside in playing the Bills for a team that is not going to win 4 in a row any way.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
24,962
Unreal America
The thing I always find weird about catchabilty on PI is that the same standard isn’t applied to holding on runs. A hold is a hold, even if the runner is on the other side of the field, running through a hole that isn’t the result of an infraction. So you’d think PI would act in the same way.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,681
Oregon
The thing I always find weird about catchabilty on PI is that the same standard isn’t applied to holding on runs. A hold is a hold, even if the runner is on the other side of the field, running through a hole that isn’t the result of an infraction. So you’d think PI would act in the same way.
Rules created by people, determined by people ... good luck getting consistency
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
47,047
Hartford, CT
The thing I always find weird about catchabilty on PI is that the same standard isn’t applied to holding on runs. A hold is a hold, even if the runner is on the other side of the field, running through a hole that isn’t the result of an infraction. So you’d think PI would act in the same way.
I actually don’t think this is true re: offensive holding. If a hold occurs away from the so called ‘point of attack’ and not on the line, eg, a Wr on the opposite end of the field behind the play, it isn’t considered holding.
 

CFB_Rules

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2016
1,636
I actually don’t think this is true re: offensive holding. If a hold occurs away from the so called ‘point of attack’ and not on the line, eg, a Wr on the opposite end of the field behind the play, it isn’t considered holding.
Correct, holding isn’t a foul away from the play unless it’s a takedown
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
24,962
Unreal America
I actually don’t think this is true re: offensive holding. If a hold occurs away from the so called ‘point of attack’ and not on the line, eg, a Wr on the opposite end of the field behind the play, it isn’t considered holding.
I was thinking about OLmen. Wasn’t clear.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,041
AZ
The thing I always find weird about catchabilty on PI is that the same standard isn’t applied to holding on runs. A hold is a hold, even if the runner is on the other side of the field, running through a hole that isn’t the result of an infraction. So you’d think PI would act in the same way.
It just feels to me as though refs have abdicated catchability with the blessing of the league. Which is fine. If the idea is that there is too much subjectivity in reffing as it is and we can’t ask them to judge it, fine. That is a valid position.

The problem though is they should make it official. And if they do I think the question whether the penalty for pi is too severe should be up for debate.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,891
Patriots ain’t winning the Super Bowl.

Taking out the Bills wouldn’t be quite as satisfying as the Red Sox taking out the Yankees this year but same principle.

I guess getting a more winnable game increases the odds of getting Mac a little bit more experience. But there is more potential upside in playing the Bills for a team that is not going to win 4 in a row any way.
Pats can hang with anyone in the AFC, I think. They could also be 1 and done. I would go for the favorable matchups. It’s going to be who it’s going to be but I am interested in the psychology of who people want and why.
 

FenwayFrenzy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
2,144
NYC
That 4th down call is one of the dumbest I have ever seen.

That's after seeing the Giants 3rd and 9 QB sneak earlier today.