What does 2023 look like?

Niastri

Member
SoSH Member
Given our front office's penchant for players with positional versatility a la Kike, Marwin Gonzalez, Dalbec, etc..., isn't it likely that Rafaela will continue to play some shortstop, some center field, some right field, maybe some second and third?
Do you Brock Holt a guy who is probably your best defender at center and short, but might not hit well enough to play the corners every day?

The only reason to play Rafaela in right is to protect Duran's arm from right field, and how they hit/defend well enough in the aggregate to make it worthwhile.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
Even if Rafaela becomes the every day CF next year, we would still need another OF if we got rid of Verdugo because Yoshida/Rafaela/Duran/Refsnyder/Abreu isn't enough.

I find it hard to believe there are any teams with worse middle infield than us, but I guess Niko Goodrum will have a decision soon.

View: https://twitter.com/SPChrisHatfield/status/1673866638049812480
Yes, Goodrum's not on the 40 man and I don't see a likely path to getting there in the next few day, so as Hawk Harrelson might say... He gone.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,224
Which I’d be fine with, finding 2 win corner OF shouldn’t be that difficult. Bloom has done it before, with Renfroe and Duvall.

I guess it all comes down to whether one thinks he’s a 2 or 4 win player, and what he expects to be paid as.

I'm not sure if it should or shouldn't, but that hasn't really been the case in Boston recently. I'm tossing out 2020 because I don't in any way consider it a real season. I'm certainly not a Bloom apologist, but I'm also not going to sit here and critique him for a fake season during a worldwide pandemic. FWIW, I'm tossing out Verdugo too, not because he isn't good (he is) and not because Bloom shouldn't get credit for landing him (he should) but because in this scenario we're talking about letting him walk (which I would, generally speaking, disagree with).

In 2021 Bloom hit it out of the park as you mentioned finding Renfroe off the scrap heap and getting a 2.4 bWAR from him.

Of course, in 2022 he jettisoned Renfroe for nothing, and as such got an unfathomable -0.4 bWAR from JBJr. Even adding in Refsnyder for his time in RF, you're talking about a .5bWAR from the RF position.

I'm not sure why you're counting Duvall in here, maybe just to say an "OF" in general. But Duvall has been primarily a CF this year, but to the point of calling him a corner OF, or just an OF in general, he's been a 2 bWAR player once in the past 5 seasons from 2018- present (and even if we want to double his 2020 production, it's 1.8 bWAR), and excepting 2021 he was below a 1.0 bWAR each of those years. For this season, he is at .5 bWAR. Even if we aggressively triple that over the next 80 games, you're talking about a 1.5 bWAR.

Yoshida - whom I really like and give Bloom credit for - is on pace to be roughly a 1.60 bWAR player (I'm just doubling his production, forgive me if there is a more nuanced calculation), and the Sox are paying him $18.6M per season. Which again - I think is a fine contract for him. If we opened with the "Reynolds offer" and Verdugo were to say "give me exactly what you gave Yoshida", I think that would actually be pretty fair compromise for both sides.




So maybe it SHOULD be easy to find a 2 WAR corner OF (I don't know, I haven't looked up the WAR for other teams), but whether it is or is not, Bloom hasn't done it consistently here in Boston. So I think a good idea would be to lock in a guy that is a really solid bet to produce a 2.0 bWAR (averaged out) per season in his prime years, with some upside to boot, especially since we are now about half way through his age 27 season and he has produced a 3.0 bWAR.

If the Sox offer him the Reynolds (or Beni) deal and he says "no thanks, and that's insulting, we're done until the off-season" then you likely aim to move him at the deadline when his value should ostensibly be the highest. I think even those of us that want to extend him would accept that if he flat out rejects a legitimate offer. But make him a real offer and stop with the Lester, Bogaerts BS "negotiations."
 
Last edited:

Niastri

Member
SoSH Member
Indeed. It is inconceivable that the Red Sox might have to contend with injuries at SS, CF, or elsewhere.
There is a difference between having a guy fill in when you have injuries (Mookie Betts pretending to be a utility infielder instead of All World right fielder for the Dodgers this year) and dooming a top100 prospect to a utility role before he even makes his debut.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
25,041
Miami (oh, Miami!)
There is a difference between having a guy fill in when you have injuries (Mookie Betts pretending to be a utility infielder instead of All World right fielder for the Dodgers this year) and dooming a top100 prospect to a utility role before he even makes his debut.
I can't speak for @Philip Jeff Frye but Rafaela is already considered (AFAIK) a ML ready + defender at SS and in CF. He's a right handed hitter who lacks discipline, and that is the Achilles heel here.

So I don't understand why playing him at CF, SS, maybe 2B, or otherwise generally in the OF would "doom" him to anything.

Why would doing that doom him?
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,315
I can't speak for @Philip Jeff Frye but Rafaela is already considered (AFAIK) a ML ready + defender at SS and in CF. He's a right handed hitter who lacks discipline, and that is the Achilles heel here.

So I don't understand why playing him at CF, SS, maybe 2B, or otherwise generally in the OF would "doom" him to anything.

Why would doing that doom him?
Right. Long term, it looks like he's a CF if he sticks with the club. But it's very easy to see him playing at least some SS until Mayer arrives.
 

Niastri

Member
SoSH Member
I can't speak for @Philip Jeff Frye but Rafaela is already considered (AFAIK) a ML ready + defender at SS and in CF. He's a right handed hitter who lacks discipline, and that is the Achilles heel here.

So I don't understand why playing him at CF, SS, maybe 2B, or otherwise generally in the OF would "doom" him to anything.

Why would doing that doom him?
Doom is overstating it, probably.

Taking a guy who's best (only) major league talent is playing plus defense at two of the three most important defensive positions, and playing him all over the diamond as a utility player is diminishing his future contributions.

If you have him as the starting CF and backup SS and he only plays anywhere else in emergencies, maybe that is a good use of his talents. Someone earlier made the argument it might hurt his development to play even that many positions, but the Sox don't seem to think so. <Shrug>
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,252
Right. Long term, it looks like he's a CF if he sticks with the club. But it's very easy to see him playing at least some SS until Mayer arrives.
Someone noted somewhere else he's had a lot of errors at SS in limited innings this year -- only 9 games there with five errors. Last year it was 21 games with 2 errors. So maybe this year is an outlier, but five errors in 9 starts is a lot.

More likely, I think, is that Story holds down SS until Mayer arrives (assuming he does!), and then the club makes a decision about who is going to stick at the position. Story was a plus defender at SS in Colorado, and would likely continue to be if his arm has made a comeback. He was also tremendous at 2B, so moving him over to 2B if someone takes over at short would be gravy.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
25,041
Miami (oh, Miami!)
Taking a guy who's best (only) major league talent is playing plus defense at two of the three most important defensive positions, and playing him all over the diamond as a utility player is diminishing his future contributions.
I think there are a lot of shoes to drop before we even get there. Does Duran stick? Is Verdugo extended? What's the SS logjam look like in 2024?

Assuming his bat was ML ready now (which it isn't), and Duval wasn't here (which he is), I could see him as a RHH spelling Duran in CF, sometimes playing RF at home, and emergency SS if someone goes down. I'd also expect him, given his speed, to be a PR and defensive sub - his defensive flexibility would be a plus there, giving a wider variety of choices for keeping him in the game and replacing an additional player.

PS - I go back and forth on the "position play detracts from batting development" argument. I think it's a real thing for some players, but affects others very little. Who knows here?
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,315
I'd also expect him, given his speed, to be a PR and defensive sub - his defensive flexibility would be a plus there, giving a wider variety of choices for keeping him in the game and replacing an additional player.
If winning MLB games right now were the only objective, he'd be a better fit for the roster right now than Hamilton, IMO. But of course, there are other considerations, and the Sox are smart to not rush him.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
I can't speak for @Philip Jeff Frye but Rafaela is already considered (AFAIK) a ML ready + defender at SS and in CF. He's a right handed hitter who lacks discipline, and that is the Achilles heel here.

So I don't understand why playing him at CF, SS, maybe 2B, or otherwise generally in the OF would "doom" him to anything.

Why would doing that doom him?
Exactly!!! We're not talking about some in season experiment like we've seen in recent years. We're not talking about a Brock Holt type who when pressed in to duty on regular basis in multiple positions becomes a bit exposed, but rather a guy who is used to carrying 2 gloves and by some accounts plays elite defense at two of the positions that you want your best defenders to play. Every team is placing some level of focus on positional flexibility and there a few guys that are considered everyday players who play multiple positions. If you have THAT sort of asset and a need, why would you shy away from it?
 

Philip Jeff Frye

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 23, 2001
10,322
Exactly!!! We're not talking about some in season experiment like we've seen in recent years. We're not talking about a Brock Holt type who when pressed in to duty on regular basis in multiple positions becomes a bit exposed, but rather a guy who is used to carrying 2 gloves and by some accounts plays elite defense at two of the positions that you want your best defenders to play. Every team is placing some level of focus on positional flexibility and there a few guys that are considered everyday players who play multiple positions. If you have THAT sort of asset and a need, why would you shy away from it?
This is exactly my point. We have a brain trust that values positional flexibility. Rafaela apparently offers that in spades. If they thought he only had a future as a centerfielder, why would he be wasting time at shortstop, especially with Mayer coming along at the same time? It seems likely that they see him not as Brock Holt, a not especially talented player who was nonetheless useful because he could play different positions, but as Tony Phillips/Ben Zobrist/Matt Carpenter, quite talented players who are even more useful because of their ability to play multiple positions.

Whether or not he's able to hit enough to be Ben Zobrist or Matt Carpenter remains to be seen.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,315
This is exactly my point. We have a brain trust that values positional flexibility. Rafaela apparently offers that in spades. If they thought he only had a future as a centerfielder, why would he be wasting time at shortstop, especially with Mayer coming along at the same time? It seems likely that they see him not as Brock Holt, a not especially talented player who was nonetheless useful because he could play different positions, but as Tony Phillips/Ben Zobrist/Matt Carpenter, quite talented players who are even more useful because of their ability to play multiple positions.
Keeping all options on the table? You never know. Maybe he has more value as a trade chip if teams think he's ready for SS. Maybe Mayer gets hurt, or traded, or just flames out. Playing him once a week at SS is probably worth whatever minor loss there is of his CF reps.
 

Yelling At Clouds

Post-darwinian
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,481
I can't speak for @Philip Jeff Frye but Rafaela is already considered (AFAIK) a ML ready + defender at SS and in CF. He's a right handed hitter who lacks discipline, and that is the Achilles heel here.

So I don't understand why playing him at CF, SS, maybe 2B, or otherwise generally in the OF would "doom" him to anything.

Why would doing that doom him?
To me, even if he does wind up as “just” a glove-first multi-position utility guy, that’s a valuable role for a good team, so I’d be okay with it. Maybe not what you expect from a top-five organizational prospect, but useful all the same.
 

grepal

New Member
Jul 20, 2005
193
Do you Brock Holt a guy who is probably your best defender at center and short, but might not hit well enough to play the corners every day?

The only reason to play Rafaela in right is to protect Duran's arm from right field, and how they hit/defend well enough in the aggregate to make it worthwhile.
Why not Duran in left? If Verdugo re-signs after this or next year, that could make sense. Yoshi can DH and spell each outfielder once in a while playing left. Might have a log jam if the Sox decide they are better off with Casas as DH.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,247
Hingham, MA
This has to be one of the streakiest .500 teams ever. They've already had 7 separate losing streaks of 3+ games, and 5 separate winning streaks of 3+ games. They have lost 2 in a row or more 12 separate times, and have won 2 in a row or more 9 separate times. I count only 8 times this year that they have gone L-W-L or W-L-W. They almost always win twice in a row or more, or lose twice in a row or more.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,558
Why not Duran in left? If Verdugo re-signs after this or next year, that could make sense. Yoshi can DH and spell each outfielder once in a while playing left. Might have a log jam if the Sox decide they are better off with Casas as DH.
I think this makes the most sense and is likely the best scenario for the outfield.... Yoshida plays mostly as a DH but can play the occasional game at LF in Fenway and give everyone a break- everyone else can shift around for day-offs. And Rafaela can occasionally take SS and/or 2B to give the middle IF a break too. I really don't think the Sox will be parking Casas as a regular DH at all. It would have been great if Dalbec was able to level off his talent to something in between horrible and his August of '21, he'd be great as a corner IF and DH platoon to give Casas and Devers a break but it's beyond clear to anyone that he's an elite AAAA talent and that's it. Best option for him is to end up on a non-contender for next season. So they'd still need a corner IF/DH platoon guy (which Turner really is doing quite well at being right now and wouldn't see him back in '24 if he's not traded away). I'm also not totally sold on Rafaela being ready to start game one on the ML roster next season but not against it if he can continue playing well and showing plate discipline in AAA (with a potential call-up) but I expect him to really struggle either way for his first several months no matter what at the ML level.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,558
This has to be one of the streakiest .500 teams ever. They've already had 7 separate losing streaks of 3+ games, and 5 separate winning streaks of 3+ games. I count only 8 times this year that they have gone L-W-L or W-L-W. They almost always win twice in a row or more, or lose twice in a row or more.
Their streakiness also doesn't line up nicely in good vs bad teams like last season. It's maddening.... but somewhat expected.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,558
Why is it expected?
Lots of young players, possible injuries were higher likelihood than other teams. If I could graph out how I expect young players to perform, on the left side of the graph would be a lot of W shaped lines that slowly move more towards a less undulating line going rightwards further into their career.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,883
This has to be one of the streakiest .500 teams ever. They've already had 7 separate losing streaks of 3+ games, and 5 separate winning streaks of 3+ games. They have lost 2 in a row or more 12 separate times, and have won 2 in a row or more 9 separate times. I count only 8 times this year that they have gone L-W-L or W-L-W. They almost always win twice in a row or more, or lose twice in a row or more.
Just when it appeared that they've kind of got things going, beating Minnesota for the second time in a row to get to 39-35, they lose 5-4 in a game they never ever should have lost. Then they get blown out by Min for a series split, then won one game over ChW, and now have lost 4 in a row. So after getting 4 games above .500, they've gone 1-6 since, to drop back one game under.

So frustrating.

By the way, this team has historically done very well in interleague play but they're getting absolutely murdered this year by NL teams:

Ari: 2-1
Atl: 1-1
Cin: 1-2
Col: 1-2
Mia: 0-2
Mil: 2-1
Phi: 2-1
Pit: 0-3
SD: 2-1
StL: 0-3

TOT: 11-17 (.393)
 

Archer1979

shazowies
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
7,991
Right Here
Younger clubs are frequently streaky. Longer season. Greater grind. More travel. Playing in the big leagues requires some acclimation especially when the highs are high and the lows are low.

You can mitigate the streakiness if you're trying to assimilate one or two players. Full scale youth movement along with injuries in skill positions isn't a recipe for consistency.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,501
This isn’t a young team, though. The median age of batters is 28.8, pitchers is 30.2. Heck, the last year of DD, the team was younger (batters 27.3, pitchers 29.0).

(Guardians are a young team, Rays are, Reds, Diamondbacks are. Red Sox are not. Heck, only the Mets have an older pitching staff.)
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,247
Hingham, MA
This isn’t a young team, though. The median age of batters is 28.8, pitchers is 30.2. Heck, the last year of DD, the team was younger (batters 27.3, pitchers 29.0).
Exactly what I was going to say. Look at last night's lineup
Verdugo - vet
Turner - vet
Refsnyder - vet
Revers - vet
Duvall - vet
Arroyo - vet
Kike - vet
Wong - young
Hamilton - young
 

Philip Jeff Frye

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 23, 2001
10,322
Are the Red Sox a young team? Obviously, there are some young players upon whom we are placing our hopes for the future, but there's plenty of older ones. Baseball Reference has their bats as the 10th oldest group in the big leagues and their pitchers as the second oldest.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,558
I think "young" is pretty relative when it comes to professional sports teams.
Wong, Casas and Bello are all official rookies. Yoshida is also... sort of. But new to MLB. Duran hasn't really played at the ML level with any consistency until this season.
Add Crawford, Winckowski... that's 6 regulars that are "young" if not rookies... actual age doesn't really matter here. I still would put Houck, Whitlock in the "young" category.
The only true vets I'd say are Verdugo, Kiké, Devers, Turner, Paxton, Jensen and Martin. The team heavily skews towards younger players, not neccesarily young people, at key positions.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
This isn’t a young team, though. The median age of batters is 28.8, pitchers is 30.2. Heck, the last year of DD, the team was younger (batters 27.3, pitchers 29.0).

(Guardians are a young team, Rays are, Reds, Diamondbacks are. Red Sox are not. Heck, only the Mets have an older pitching staff.)
Young isn't necessarily about age, but in this case it's about experience at the major league level. Wong, Casas, Duran, Hamilton, Valdez and to a lesser degree Dalbec are young in their MLB careers.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
25,041
Miami (oh, Miami!)
This isn’t a young team, though. The median age of batters is 28.8, pitchers is 30.2. Heck, the last year of DD, the team was younger (batters 27.3, pitchers 29.0).

(Guardians are a young team, Rays are, Reds, Diamondbacks are. Red Sox are not. Heck, only the Mets have an older pitching staff.)
In terms of the team this year, the median age is what it is. But I think roster construction and playing time is worth paying attention to.

The age cutoffs are somewhat arbitrary, but. . .

The Sox have signed/acquired a number of vets at the end of their careers for stopgap stability:
Turner - 38​
Kluber, Martin - 37​
Bleier - 36​
Jansen - 35​
Paxton, Duvall - 34 (both on 1 year contracts)​

The also have some older/prime-year guys who they found/signed as role players:
Sherriff - 33​
Refsnyder - 32​
Ort, Bernardino, Joely - 31​
Tapia, Reyes - 29​

The long term core is younger:
Verdugo, Wong, Whitlock, Houck, Crawford - 27​
Devers, Duran - 26​
Winckowski, Murphy - 25​
Bello - 24​
Casas - 23​

But there's a real gap for key players in the age 28-33 bracket.
Hernandez - 31 (1 year contract)​
Pivetta - 30​
Story - 30 (long term)​
Yoshida - 29 (long term)​
Schreiber - 29​
McGuire, Arroyo - 28​

Which is basically 2 key players in Story/Yoshida, and three key secondary players (McGuire, Arroyo, Schreiber).
Pivetta who pitched himself out of a starting role, but is a nice bullpen piece, can't really be considered a key player going forward. Likewise Hernandez who is a defense first CF.

***

Or consider games-played this year: Players who have played half the games over age 28:
Refsnyder - 49​
Yoshida - 69​
Hernandez - 71​
Turner - 76​
Age 28 or under:
Arroyo - 44​
Wong - 59​
Duran - 60​
Casas - 70​
Verdugo - 72​
Devers - 76​

TLDR: The roster paints the picture of a mostly younger team, stabilized by a handful of older vets who are on short-term deals.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
I asked similar last season when the Sox offense disappeared for long stretches. What part (if any) does Pete Fatse play in all of this? We've seen this team hit in bunches for periods of time this and last season and then the prolonged disappearing acts.
 

Jason Bae

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2021
642
NJ
Sox are hitting noticeably worse this month.

March/April: .257/.333/.436, 163 runs in 29 games
May: .272/.333/.433, 122 runs in 26 games
June: .249/.325/.397 (not including tonight), 112 runs in 27 games

The power numbers have been trending down, going from a .179 ISO in the first month to a mere .148 ISO this month.

Some of this month's notable struggles:
Kiké (42 wRC+)
Yoshida (91 wRC+)
Wong (59 wRC+)
Arroyo (79 wRC+)
Duvall (47 wRC+)
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,247
Hingham, MA

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,608
Sox are hitting noticeably worse this month.

March/April: .257/.333/.436, 163 runs in 29 games
May: .272/.333/.433, 122 runs in 26 games
June: .249/.325/.397 (not including tonight), 112 runs in 27 games

The power numbers have been trending down, going from a .179 ISO in the first month to a mere .148 ISO this month.

Some of this month's notable struggles:
Kiké (42 wRC+)
Yoshida (91 wRC+)
Wong (59 wRC+)
Arroyo (79 wRC+)
Duvall (47 wRC+)
and the problem is a bit deeper than that... of the 81 (not including today) games the sox have played this year

Breakdown of runs scored by the offense

32 of those games we scored more than 5 runs (40 %)
(9 games in June, 11 In may, 12, in April+1 March)


Less than 5 runs were scored in 49 games (60 % of those games)

June 18 games
May 15 games
April 16 games

6 of those 49 were 5 runs
10 were 4 runs
9 were 3 runs
10 were 2 runs
11 were 1 run
4 were no runs


View: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XSzjBPXeCR3XOm3K8CTHeL5Me4ZGAD98hjU6iUH98bM/edit?usp=sharing
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,501
Who do we think should be hitting better? Career mediocrities like Kike and Duvall? Connor Wong? I’d like to see coaches held accountable for results once in a while, but the talent is what it is.
 
Mar 30, 2023
197
In terms of the team this year, the median age is what it is. But I think roster construction and playing time is worth paying attention to.

The age cutoffs are somewhat arbitrary, but. . .

The Sox have signed/acquired a number of vets at the end of their careers for stopgap stability:
Turner - 38​
Kluber, Martin - 37​
Bleier - 36​
Jansen - 35​
Paxton, Duvall - 34 (both on 1 year contracts)​

The also have some older/prime-year guys who they found/signed as role players:
Sherriff - 33​
Refsnyder - 32​
Ort, Bernardino, Joely - 31​
Tapia, Reyes - 29​

The long term core is younger:
Verdugo, Wong, Whitlock, Houck, Crawford - 27​
Devers, Duran - 26​
Winckowski, Murphy - 25​
Bello - 24​
Casas - 23​

But there's a real gap for key players in the age 28-33 bracket.
Hernandez - 31 (1 year contract)​
Pivetta - 30​
Story - 30 (long term)​
Yoshida - 29 (long term)​
Schreiber - 29​
McGuire, Arroyo - 28​

Which is basically 2 key players in Story/Yoshida, and three key secondary players (McGuire, Arroyo, Schreiber).
Pivetta who pitched himself out of a starting role, but is a nice bullpen piece, can't really be considered a key player going forward. Likewise Hernandez who is a defense first CF.

***

Or consider games-played this year: Players who have played half the games over age 28:
Refsnyder - 49​
Yoshida - 69​
Hernandez - 71​
Turner - 76​
Age 28 or under:
Arroyo - 44​
Wong - 59​
Duran - 60​
Casas - 70​
Verdugo - 72​
Devers - 76​

TLDR: The roster paints the picture of a mostly younger team, stabilized by a handful of older vets who are on short-term deals.
This is some incredible performance art. "Sure, if you're dumb enough to simply look at the ages of the Red Sox players and compare them to the ages of the players on other teams, then you might come to the dumb and wrong conclusion that they are older than most other teams. But if you: (a) discount 14 total players because they are 'stopgaps' or 'role players', (b) invent your own 'long-term core' off 11 players, only 3 of whom have even proven themselves capable of starting for a first-division team, and (c) arbitrarily decide that 28 is the cut-off between young and old while also discounting half the season, then you will see that the Red Sox are obviously one of the youngest teams in the league."
 

Jason Bae

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2021
642
NJ
Who do we think should be hitting better? Career mediocrities like Kike and Duvall? Connor Wong? I’d like to see coaches held accountable for results once in a while, but the talent is what it is.
I don't disagree, but there's a pretty big difference between being merely below average (Kiké has a career OPS+ of 94) and being plain bad (69 OPS+ in 2023).
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,501
I don't disagree, but there's a pretty big difference between being merely below average (Kiké has a career OPS+ of 94) and being plain bad (69 OPS+ in 2023).
He had a 73 OPS+ last year, so is it that surprising?

Last year he was at 221/291/338, this year….227/287/341.
 

Beomoose

is insoxicated
SoSH Member
May 28, 2006
21,512
Exiled
Who do we think should be hitting better? Career mediocrities like Kike and Duvall? Connor Wong? I’d like to see coaches held accountable for results once in a while, but the talent is what it is.
I take "Hitting better" to mean something other than "we need a bunch of guys to hit way above their career stats." Aside from home runs, the team's offensive stats don't look that horrible except for the fact that they're not translating into wins. Situationally, we don't hit when we need to.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,249
Portland
Apropos of . . I'm not sure. Yoshida and Verdugo are the same hitter.
Yoshida - 8.9 BB%, 10.9% k rate, .168 ISO .297/.371/.465
Verdugo - 8.9 BB%, 12% k rate, .167 ISO .302/.374/.471
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
25,041
Miami (oh, Miami!)
This is some incredible performance art. "Sure, if you're dumb enough to simply look at the ages of the Red Sox players and compare them to the ages of the players on other teams, then you might come to the dumb and wrong conclusion that they are older than most other teams. But if you: (a) discount 14 total players because they are 'stopgaps' or 'role players', (b) invent your own 'long-term core' off 11 players, only 3 of whom have even proven themselves capable of starting for a first-division team, and (c) arbitrarily decide that 28 is the cut-off between young and old while also discounting half the season, then you will see that the Red Sox are obviously one of the youngest teams in the league."
Oh hey, look - a strawman.
 

grepal

New Member
Jul 20, 2005
193
I think this makes the most sense and is likely the best scenario for the outfield.... Yoshida plays mostly as a DH but can play the occasional game at LF in Fenway and give everyone a break- everyone else can shift around for day-offs. And Rafaela can occasionally take SS and/or 2B to give the middle IF a break too. I really don't think the Sox will be parking Casas as a regular DH at all. It would have been great if Dalbec was able to level off his talent to something in between horrible and his August of '21, he'd be great as a corner IF and DH platoon to give Casas and Devers a break but it's beyond clear to anyone that he's an elite AAAA talent and that's it. Best option for him is to end up on a non-contender for next season. So they'd still need a corner IF/DH platoon guy (which Turner really is doing quite well at being right now and wouldn't see him back in '24 if he's not traded away). I'm also not totally sold on Rafaela being ready to start game one on the ML roster next season but not against it if he can continue playing well and showing plate discipline in AAA (with a potential call-up) but I expect him to really struggle either way for his first several months no matter what at the ML level.
I think we are looking down the barrel of another last place finish this year. That is not assured but the AL East is a real gauntlet and we are built to compete in the AL Central. That said, if we do trade Duvall might we see him for a cup of coffee in Sept. More likely we keep him in AAA for service time restrictions. There are some good things happening on this team but not enough to make a run.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,252
Who do we think should be hitting better? Career mediocrities like Kike and Duvall? Connor Wong? I’d like to see coaches held accountable for results once in a while, but the talent is what it is.
Couple of points: yeah, Kike and Arroyo could be better... but I think their performances thus far are well within their career possibilities. Like you said, Kike was bad last year too. It's possible he's just lost 'it.'

On the other hand, Duvall is actually performing better than his career average so far. hitting .269 would about match his career best from 2019. Now, he's posting his lowest K rate since 2020, his last 'good season' (wrc+ of 115, OBP over .300), so maybe he sustains it? I doubt it. He's striking out as much as ever in June (32% K rate), so unfortunately March may have been a mirage.

I think Raffy is the guy who is clearly underperforming. I think we were expecting a wrc+ of 130 or so, and we're getting 113. A lot of that seems to be BABIP driven. He's crushing the ball, obviously, and his BABIP is a measly .256 against a career average of .313.

Triston also seems to be underperforming slightly, just based on his contact profile. He's got a wrc+ of 102 and the projection systems expect something around 110 going forward - so not a huge improvement, but an improvement nonetheless.

As for the others... I'd expect some regression from Duran's BABIP of .412, which has actually gone up since I last posted about him. I love Verdugo's season, too, but I wouldn't surprised to see a second-half swoon from him.

Story coming back would be a wrc+ improvement over Kike of 30 or more, so that would be nice. Devers could be better the second half, but there's no guarantees there - Casas could be better, or he could not. Duran and Duvall probably give us a wrc+ of around 100 going forward, hopefully. Dugo might slide. Which is all to say I think the offense is about what we'd expect.

The rest of 2023 really hinges on the pitching. If Paxton pitches like an ace and Sale comes back healthy, if Whitlock makes some adjustments, they can climb back for a Wild Card spot, I think. But they might slide too far before Sale comes back, in which case management might be better off seeing what they can get for Paxton et al.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,224
Who do we think should be hitting better? Career mediocrities like Kike and Duvall? Connor Wong? I’d like to see coaches held accountable for results once in a while, but the talent is what it is.

I agree with this totally, at least in terms of why I don't really blame Cora for the struggles of the team this year.

Hernandez OPS+ the past 5 years have been 87, 81, 108, 73 and 69. One of these things is not like the other. Arroyo being so bad is a bit more surprising (he was trending in a direction to at least be a capable offensive player when he was on the field, but of course, he is never on the field). Duvall is a career 98 OPS+ player, but certainly past his prime seasons, his season numbers still look really good from his crazy hot stretch early - he isn't as good as he was during that stretch, but he also isn't as bad as his .167/.265/.283/.548 line since. I think a reasonable expectation for a player past his prime is to be a bit worse than his career averages, so something in the 95 OPS+ range was a fair expectation. Right in line with that thought process, Turner has been good, and has been continuing his downward trend (not surprising based on his age) of going 133 to 120 to 119 to 110. Which again, is not surprising that guys start trending below their career lines as they get older (Turner is a career 125 OPS+ player).

On the current 26 man roster, by my count 21 of them have been acquired by Bloom (I believe the 5 that weren't are Casas, Devers, Duran, Bello and Crawford). They were pretty much all acquired (for better or worse) to be stop gap pieces while getting to the guys in system. It shouldn't be a surprise when, collectively, a team of players acquired on the cheap produce like guys whom are cheap for a reason. If the Sox had San Diego's roster or the Mets roster and were having their seasons then yes, fire Cora yesterday.

But it's not a roster built to win; it's a roster built to not completely suck and he's getting not completely suck performance out of it.

I will say that Cora was hired to be the manager of a really freaking good MLB team (they were good before Cora got here in 2018). Maybe an argument can be made that he's not the right manager for a total rebuild, but that's a different argument than he's not getting what should be expected. A removal for fit may be justifiable; a removal for cause, not so much.
 
Last edited: