What Happens Next if They Sign Teoscar?

Status
Not open for further replies.

koufax32

He'll cry if he wants to...
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2006
9,127
Duval
What’s the deal with this guy? Writes for the Athletic but has a little over 2k followers. Only other “breaking news” on his feed was Zeke to the Pats, now he’s scooped everyone else?

I’m unfamiliar with him, so if he’s legit, someone please enlighten me.
 

BeantownIdaho

New Member
Dec 5, 2005
481
Nampa, Idaho
Makes Duran or Rafaela available as part of a pitching move?
That’s whet I was thinking. If they bring Paxton aboard as what is being reported then I’m guessing we have a pitcher added to the package. I was hoping we could add Yelich and his salary to a Burnes trade to make it not quite as steep a price, but this does not seem make that possible. But a package could be coming together none the less.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,552
What’s the deal with this guy? Writes for the Athletic but has a little over 2k followers. Only other “breaking news” on his feed was Zeke to the Pats, now he’s scooped everyone else?

I’m unfamiliar with him, so if he’s legit, someone please enlighten me.
He does not even work for the Athletic as far as I can tell. No authors by that name on the athletic app
 

Harry Hooper

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
34,635
The em dashes are confusing. I think he meant to say “are” and “than”
Gammons is the Oracle at Delphi in terms of clarity.

Did he mean 2025, as in Sox won't be competitive in 2024? Ties into the odd stuff about fun at the end, as in have fun even while losing more games than you win? We need a decoder ring.
 

Seels

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
4,980
NH
yea I'd guess Gammons means 2025 too. And well fine if that's the case, but what's the point of watching more than a handful of games in 2024 if that's the attitude?
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,666
Miami (oh, Miami!)
I’m not sure what we are arguing about. My point was that Teoscar Hernandez fills a role that at this point cannot be filled within the system. The top dogs are up the middle players who hit left handed.
We're not "arguing." Tyler O'Neill is a RHH corner OF who has been a power hitter in the past when healthy. The Sox traded a pair of pitching prospects, Robertson and Santos for O'Neill. There was no salary dump, there was no ML player swap. This is a straight up acquisition.

Ergo, they plan on playing Tyler O'Neill at the ML level as a corner OF for one year.

That does not mean he'll be healthy, or good if healthy, or that he'll be extended, or that they won't sign another (better) player, or trade other players, or even trade O'Neill.

What it does mean is that a RHH corner OF with power is in the system, and can fill that role. His name is Tyler O'Neill.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,287
What’s the OF situation if they get Teoscar?

Teoscar
O’Neill
Duran
Yoshida
Refnsyder
Abreu
Rafaella

Obviously a couple of guys are either getting traded or sent to AAA. Refsnyder in particular already seemed redundant once we got O’Neill. And Yoshida can DH, but the thing I don’t like about that (compared to Turner) is that you now need someone else who can play 1B. Hmm. Many pieces in play.
 
Last edited:

jbupstate

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2022
617
New York, USA
What’s the OF situation if they get Teoscar?

Teoscar
O’Neill
Duran
Yoshida
Refnsyder
Abreu
Rafaella

Obviously a couple of guys are either getting traded or sent to AAA. Refsnyder in particular already seemed redundant once we got O’Neill. And Yoshida can DH, but the thing I don’t like about that (compared to Turner) is that you now need someone else who can play 1B. Hmm. Many pieces in play.
Dalbec played a bunch of games in the OF for Worcester. Not sure if he’s acceptable out there but he is capable of also playing around the infield. He hit LHP enough to be part of a platoon.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,837
Bad defense. Pretty good RH power. Ok. I've been on the "they need RH power" train for a while now. Not sure he's the best guy they can get but maybe he is. He's certainly a legit MLB regular starting caliber player. Last three seasons he's averaged just under 3.0 bWAR per year, which is fine.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,294
Bad defense. Pretty good RH power. Ok. I've been on the "they need RH power" train for a while now. Not sure he's the best guy they can get but maybe he is. He's certainly a legit MLB regular starting caliber player. Last three seasons he's averaged just under 3.0 bWAR per year, which is fine.
Last year he was incredibly streaky. Had 4 months under .700 OPS and then mashed the other 2 months. Doesn’t look like he was too streaky in 2021 or 2022. This would be a meh move to me in isolation. If it’s part of something larger to get another SP, it would get more intriguing.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,679
What’s the OF situation if they get Teoscar?

Teoscar
O’Neill
Duran
Yoshida
Refnsyder
Abreu
Rafaella

Obviously a couple of guys are either getting traded or sent to AAA. Refsnyder in particular already seemed redundant once we got O’Neill. And Yoshida can DH, but the thing I don’t like about that (compared to Turner) is that you now need someone else who can play 1B. Hmm. Many pieces in play.
With a decent chance Roman Anthony has a starting job by April/May 2025 (aiming for a ROY draft pick).

So looking at 2025, a Teoscar signing means he’d join Yoshida, Abreu, Duran, Rafaela, and Anthony sharing four spots, with Bleis hopefully on the horizon.

If the Sox think Anthony can actually hang in CF a few years, I think Rafaela is indeed part of a package on the block for a starter.
 

BringBackMo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
1,332
At least to hear the Sox Prospects guys talk about it, scouts in the organization apparently do think Anthony can stick at CF. Supposedly, they see a potential above-average defender there. No idea if that’s really the case, but that’s what was said on one of the recent podcasts.

I could see Rafaela going in a deal for pitching, especially since Breslow has said they will look to deal position players for arms. Then again, I wouldn’t mind if they just sent him back to AAA to see if he can/will work on his chase issues.
 

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
33,714
That Gammo tweet with the Teoscar smoke has me a bit spooked, not gonna lie. Another bridge year is one thing, but potentially severely overpaying Teoscar?
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,405
That Gammo tweet with the Teoscar smoke has me a bit spooked, not gonna lie. Another bridge year is one thing, but potentially severely overpaying Teoscar?
Did Gammo make a Teoscar tweet? Or are you saying the Gammo Yoshida tweet gave you a contact high and the prospect of expensive Teoscar is turning your trip bad?
 

OCD SS

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I really hope this rumor is not credible. TH's best year was the short 2020 season at age 27, and after that he's declined as he's gone past the average peak age, with 2021-22 still looking good (by wOBA and WRC+), and then a noticeable drop off last year (age 30) to barely above average. He is not a good defender and is going to be locked up for ages 31-34?

This looks like a player who has peaked and the team is clearly paying for the decline. The only way this contract works is if it's something that can be easily jettisoned. I don't see the point to paying him and trading for a pitcher with less control, instead of just paying for a pitcher (I guess if you can get a solid SP for a package without the blue chip prospects, then this might make sense, but I doubt that's possible).
 

Max Power

thai good. you like shirt?
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
8,035
Boston, MA
Gurriel is only 1 year younger and hits for less power. Their overall value may be similar, but the Red Sox might think Teoscar's skills would be a better match for Fenway and the current needs than Gurriel.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,505
I would have rather gone $30/M for Gray and $30M for Nola and keep the OF as is.

I mean this in a way that I’m assuming there’s a spending ceiling and that $30M for those two would have been the overpay that moved them to Boston
 

cantor44

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2020
1,645
Chicago, IL
I would have rather gone $30/M for Gray and $30M for Nola and keep the OF as is.

I mean this in a way that I’m assuming there’s a spending ceiling and that $30M for those two would have been the overpay that moved them to Boston
Yeah, I'm with you that signing quality FAs when the team has the payroll space is much preferable than trading good young players. It would sting to see either Duran or Abreu go - I think both could give us several years of exciting play. Though I like the possibilty of Teoscar joining the team, offering some power from the right side, which they sorely need.

If they get him, and the subsequent shoe is a talented pitcher via a trade, well, it could potentially be worth it. Though I hope they sign at least ONE good FA pitcher, whether Imanaga or Montgomery or Snell, even while maybe a second will be acquired through trade ...
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,287
Gurriel is only 1 year younger and hits for less power. Their overall value may be similar, but the Red Sox might think Teoscar's skills would be a better match for Fenway and the current needs than Gurriel.
Sure, I can see wanting him more. I’d just expect the price to be in the same ballpark.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,845
Honolulu HI
Sure, I can see wanting him more. I’d just expect the price to be in the same ballpark.
Yeah, I wouldn't offer Hernandez a dime more than Gurriel received. They are incredibly similar players both offensively (career OPS .12 points apart) and defensively (both are bad for their careers but rated a bit above average last season), except Gurriel is younger and had a better season last year while Hernandez is a year older and is coming off 4 straight seasons of declining production with the bat. Even at equal money I'd be prefer Gurriel. Sox would probably be better served with a shorter, cheaper deal for Duvall.
 
Last edited:

NJ_Sox_Fan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 2, 2006
10,914
NJ
Thoughts on adding Soler as a RH bat rather than Hernandez ... will be 32 - might come on a shorter deal?
I’d much rather Soler than Hernandez

Of course I’d like them to get a few SP as well and maybe stop acting like they’re an impoverished hapless franchise like Oakland but what can you do
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,845
Honolulu HI
Thoughts on adding Soler as a RH bat rather than Hernandez ... will be 32 - might come on a shorter deal?
He'd be cheaper but he can no longer play the field, and probably never should have even when he did. He'd be another guy whose natural position is DH on a team that seems to have cornered the market on players fitting that description.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
2,845
Honolulu HI
I really, really hope this rumor is bogus. Spending Eduardo Rodriguez money on a declining Teoscar Hernandez - for 4 friggin years- is ridiculous. There is little reason to think that he'd even be an upgrade from Tyler O'Neil, who can at least play defense. If the team wants to waste a bunch of money on an uninspiring free agent, I'd rather they blow away the competition on Marcus Stroman or an injured Clayton Kershaw. If they are going to waste money it should least be in an area of need...
 

brandonchristensen

Loves Aaron Judge
SoSH Member
Feb 4, 2012
38,671
I really, really hope this rumor is bogus. Spending Eduardo Rodriguez money on a declining Teoscar Hernandez - for 4 friggin years- is ridiculous. There is little reason to think that he'd even be an upgrade from Tyler O'Neil, who can at least play defense. If the team wants to waste a bunch of money on an uninspiring free agent, I'd rather they blow away the competition on Marcus Stroman or an injured Clayton Kershaw. If they are going to waste money it should least be in an area of need...
Yep. The Sox are just a slog to follow.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,718
Oregon
I really, really hope this rumor is bogus.
Take heart in that no one has followed up on it ... they didn't even recap it on MLBTR. Shows, once again, that the internet is filled with people claiming to be "insiders," who in fact aren't worth posting here. The guy who started this claimed to work for The Athletic; yet no evidence that he does could be found. It doesn't take long to figure out whether a source is legit, and it sure would save a lot of unnecessary angst if people did so before posting such "reports."
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,405
Attempting to answer the new thread title, if we now have a Teoscar, that almost certainly means he's in LF with Masa at DH. So with O'Neill in right, we've got an overflow in the OF with one starting spot for Duran, Abreu & Rafaela, and I have to assume at least one is getting traded, though I think with O'Neill's injury history it would be prudent to hold on to the third.

Then again, our OF is suddenly right handed, so maybe it's Refsnyder who gets a new home as having a platoon isn't urgent anymore?

Among IF, Yoshida's move to DH means one less space available to find coverage for the corners. I think it becomes extra important to find a 2B who can do that for flexibility (I'll continue to bang the Drury drum), but I also want someone on the bench who'd be comfortable spelling Casas. If Urshela's market slips, he might fit? But it doesn't seem likely to me that he can't find something better than a super sub role.

1. Duran CF L
2. Story SS R
3. Yoshida DH L
4. Devers 3B L
5. Hernandez LF R
6. Casas 1B L
7. O'Neill RF R
8. Drury 2B R
9. Wong C R

Bench: McGuire, Abreu, Urshela/Rafaela, Reyes
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,679
Take heart in that no one has followed up on it ... they didn't even recap it on MLBTR. Shows, once again, that the internet is filled with people claiming to be "insiders," who in fact aren't worth posting here. The guy who started this claimed to work for The Athletic; yet no evidence that he does could be found. It doesn't take long to figure out whether a source is legit, and it sure would save a lot of unnecessary angst if people did so before posting such "reports."
Speier reported that the Sox had been “discussing potential contract parameters” with Teoscar as of Saturday night. Haven’t seen any credible reports of a 4 year deal but there’s a lot of smoke, and the silence could be due to the holiday.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.