Thank you, news cycle.grsharky7 said:All of a sudden this story is not on the front page of espn's mobile page. Starting to lose a little steam?
Thank you, news cycle.grsharky7 said:All of a sudden this story is not on the front page of espn's mobile page. Starting to lose a little steam?
grsharky7 said:All of a sudden this story is not on the front page of espn's mobile page. Starting to lose a little steam?
Hagios said:
So you think the air is being let out of deflate-gate?
All the principals (BB, TB, Kraft, NFL) have made statements. Absent the league locating a smoking gun through their initial interviews or review of stadium security or CBS footage, there won't be any new developments for awhile. Any interviews with players will have to go through the NFLPA, which will take even longer because the NFLPA is in no mood to help the NFL these days.grsharky7 said:All of a sudden this story is not on the front page of espn's mobile page. Starting to lose a little steam?
Because soft footballs are easier for receivers to catch but harder to intercept. #inanetheoryofthedayMystic Merlin said:
The Pats throw way fewer interceptions than the league at large, too!
Monbo Jumbo said:Goodell Goes AWOL on Deflategate - Kavitha Davidson for Bloomberg View.
and
Worth reading the whole thing - Ms Davidson gets it right.
I would imagine that a lot of the variance in fumbling is driven by the QB and hits to the QB.jose melendez said:That was bizarre. Really bizarre. The other thing I've hit on in rereading it is that not only is correlation not causation, but since he cannot establish that the Pats used deflated balls in other games, there is no correlation either. All he proves is that the Pats are unusually good at not fumbling. Cause =?
bsj said:I'm starting to buy into the sauna theory. It screams Belichick. Find a loophole in the rule book and exploit it. If found to be what happened, there will be outcry when the Patriots are not punished (because there was no rule prescribing the temp of the air to be pumped in) but there will also be a new rule next year.
It will once again be a case of the Patriots being smarter than the league (although I have zero doubt other teams are doing this too)...
Yeah I disagree. The rule book does not indicate temperature of air pumped into balls. Only the pressure at measurement, and that they remain untouched afterwards. I feel like if they saw someone walking into the sauna with the balls they could very easily say "tom likes the balls damp and warm"....as long as this happened before the weighing.TomTerrific said:
I think what we're seeing here is a desperation theory that is being floated by sources who would love to find something that points away from their basic incompetence. And, by the way, we better hope it's not true because our "everyone does it" defense would become a lot harder to sell. "Yeah, Rodgers puts a few extra puffs in, but these guys baked them to 200 degrees!!". Yeesh.
I actually would be very surprised if the Patriots were doing this. Only if somehow Brady and/or the equipment staff had determined that this type of ball preparation really worked for TB12 could I imagine this would somehow be possible. I give this about .002% chance of being true.
No, the "balls were submitted underinflated, refs don't really check" theory along with a dash of normal temperature processes seems pretty close to the truth at this point. IMHO.
TomTerrific said:
I think what we're seeing here is a desperation theory that is being floated by sources who would love to find something that points away from their basic incompetence. And, by the way, we better hope it's not true because our "everyone does it" defense would become a lot harder to sell. "Yeah, Rodgers puts a few extra puffs in, but these guys baked them to 200 degrees!!". Yeesh.
I actually would be very surprised if the Patriots were doing this. Only if somehow Brady and/or the equipment staff had determined that this type of ball preparation really worked for TB12 could I imagine this would somehow be possible. I give this about .002% chance of being true.
No, the "balls were submitted underinflated, refs don't really check" theory along with a dash of normal temperature processes seems pretty close to the truth at this point. IMHO.
EDIT: Yeah, I'm assuming no one else does this either. If they do, then the chances the Pats were doing it go way up, obviously
Peak Oil Can Boyd said:
Agreed. There's also no way Belichick and Brady have those press conferences if this is what they were doing.
He has to live with himself. I see that as payback enough.LuckyBen said:Any chance we see Brunell pay consequences if patriots are exonerated?
SumnerH said:
Yeah, I wanted the hot air theory before the press conferences. Legal, clever, and a big F you to the league. But there's no way they'd give those statements if they were doing this.
The country and media will lose interest just in time for the pats to be exonerated.grsharky7 said:All of a sudden this story is not on the front page of espn's mobile page. Starting to lose a little steam?
Nuke them from orbit.RedOctober3829 said:Unless this can be 100% proven to be an intentional act by the Patriots, what the hell can the NFL do to them?
RedOctober3829 said:Unless this can be 100% proven to be an intentional act by the Patriots, what the hell can the NFL do to them?
That was perfect.Helmet Head said:I don't know if this has been posted yet. I have not seen it but Ayers is awesome. He walked away in the middle of questions. Good for fucking him.
Love it
About 1:30 in cause the rest is all trash
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/nfl-breaks-silence-deflate-gate-28443256
They'll lose interest at kickoff, to be honest. If the Pats lose and the game isn't close, then the CW will be that this was a distraction. OTOH, A close game or convincing Pats victory will probably cause most people to shrug and move on, except for established Pats haters.twibnotes said:The country and media will lose interest just in time for the pats to be exonerated.
Problem is, we don't know for sure that they were alerted, do we?tims4wins said:The only reason I struggle with the refs only feeling the balls is that it appears as if the league was alerted to the issue before the game - if that was the case why wouldn't they pressure test them (aside from sting operation)?
tims4wins said:The only reason I struggle with the refs only feeling the balls is that it appears as if the league was alerted to the issue before the game - if that was the case why wouldn't they pressure test them (aside from sting operation)?
Kull said:A possible problem with the sauna theory is the NFL still has the backup set of 12 balls. If those were heated in the sauna, they would all be roughly 2 PSI below standard, and you can bet the mouthbreathers at league HQ would have leaked that little tidbit. So the sauna theory requires the Pats ballboys to hand off two sealed bags to the refs, one of which would be noticeably warmer than the other. I just don't buy that.
What we do have is Bill's statement that the Pats inflate to 12.5, and they can lose some pressure when going from the locker room to the environment. Everything about his press conference statement implies that he immersed himself in learning the details of the Pats pre-game ball prep process, and all his comments were shared accordingly. He even commented on "learning more on this in the past few days than he'd known in his whole career. And you can bet your ass that "learning" didn't come from reading news reports.
And since the league "destroyed the evidence" (by reinflating the original 12 balls at half time), we'll never know for certain what the PSI really was, nor how much it actually dropped during the half time measurement (everything on that is anecdotal).
Bill had no reason to lie on this, because omitting details like the sauna absolutely would came back to bite him. It was a locker-room-to-field temperature differential. Period. Sometimes the easiest explanations actually are the correct ones.
Right we don't know when, just that it happenedtwibnotes said:Problem is, we don't know for sure that they were alerted, do we?
I wonder if the colts planned this but didn't say anything to the league. Even if the league is willing to participate in a sting (pathetic if so), the colts wouldn't know that for sure.
Those 2 have flat out embarrassed themselves.tbb345 said:Mort is on ESPN Radio right now. Doesn't really seem like he knows much more than we do...but of course he brings up what Aikman said and that Belicheck could be suspended for more than a year. Good Jesus
My thought is that this why there is so little information forthcoming from the league. They have some culpability here in that they did not gauge check the balls, or at least not all of the balls. Or perhaps they used a different gauge for the Colts's (apostrophe correct here?) from the one they used for the Pats before the game. i.e. they had two officials doing the tests or some such. I mean, there's a bunch of different possibilities here, but I have little doubt that the officials did not follow the protocol 100% to the letter or the NFL would have explicitly stated that. The ambiguity that the word "gauge" was not used in that opening paragraph of their statement is the most telling in all of this. They are covering for the officials in that statement IMO.tims4wins said:The only reason I struggle with the refs only feeling the balls is that it appears as if the league was alerted to the issue before the game - if that was the case why wouldn't they pressure test them (aside from sting operation)?
Because, they gave a drunk-dial call from Irsay all the attention it deserved, and weren't aware that he was going to keep dialing after the fact?tims4wins said:The only reason I struggle with the refs only feeling the balls is that it appears as if the league was alerted to the issue before the game - if that was the case why wouldn't they pressure test them (aside from sting operation)?
DrewDawg said:
If it was a sting operation, they certainly would not have refilled the balls, they would have kept them for "evidence".
And no one has yet photoshopped rows of footballs on those benches becauseeeeee......?Corsi said:hmmmm
twibnotes said:Problem is, we don't know for sure that they were alerted, do we?
I wonder if the colts planned this but didn't say anything to the league. Even if the league is willing to participate in a sting (pathetic if so), the colts wouldn't know that for sure.
plus the NFL could not classify it as tampering with the balls after the refs certify them which is the only specified punishable offense according to the league rules.lambeau said:http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/patriots/2015/01/23/deflategate-air-pressure-moist/22242609/
I love the sauna theory. I can't do the math, but saunas can be 200 degrees F--that air would presumably lose pressure as it cooled. And it would be legal! And so Belichikian. I suppose it wouldn't explain the backup balls, if they were normal.
Might I direct your attention to this list. Start from the bottom and work up (any name way at the bottom of that list, like, second from the bottom, look familiar?):Mystic Merlin said:The Pats throw way fewer interceptions than the league at large, too!
The kicking balls are prepped by the league, not by the teams.norm from cheers said:
If it is possible to affect the internal PSI with heat isn't it possible that kickers would want the ball internal temp low at the official testing, and as it warms up, the PSI increases and makes the ball harder?
Omar's Wacky Neighbor said:Might I direct your attention to this list. Start from the bottom and work up (any name way at the bottom of that list, like, second from the bottom, look familiar?):
http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/quarterback-interception-rates/2014/
it is probably more likely something he picked up while coaching in another cold weather city like NY or Cleveland.bsj said:I'm starting to buy into the sauna theory. It screams Belichick. Find a loophole in the rule book and exploit it. If found to be what happened, there will be outcry when the Patriots are not punished (because there was no rule prescribing the temp of the air to be pumped in) but there will also be a new rule next year.
It will once again be a case of the Patriots being smarter than the league (although I have zero doubt other teams are doing this too)...
Since the specific rule was first posted, my thought was that 12.5-13.5 was a number the league just pulled out of their ass, simply to have an actual number (that kept everyone happy) in the rule book, with no real intent to enforce the number except in extreme cases (like the home team tossing a visiting FG kicker a 6psi ball when the game is on the line).norm from cheers said:As a disciple of this thread all week, (I probably have @1,000 views of the almost 600k) I have to say, the fleshing out some theories and science and possibilities of wtf happened is awesome. A couple questions for the more learned.
Is it at all possible, that the PSI rules are out dated and even problematic as the rule was written in the 1930's when passing wasn't a big part of the offensive scheme and the football was essentially totally different?