#DFG: Canceling the Noise

Is there any level of suspension that you would advise Tom to accept?


  • Total voters
    208

mwonow

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 4, 2005
7,162
Harry Hooper said:
Cue Johnny Most saying, And justice prevails."
 
I was actually looking for one of Johnny's patented "Justice!" growls on YouTube two days ago - y'know, in the hopes that...
 
JUSTICE!
 
would reign, and rain down on RG and his scheming minions
 

SeanBerry

Knows about the CBA.
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,599
Section 519
Huge win for Pats/Brady. I still think losing the 1st round pick is a bigger punishment but Brady and the NFLPA just humiliated Goodell like I've never seen a commissioner made a fool of. Maybe Bowie Kuhn in 81? Paul Tagliabue vs. Al Davis?
 
This has to be end of Roger Goodell, right? With really smart guys like Manfred and Silver running the shows, Goodell looks even dumber than he would have 20 years ago. 
 

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
ConigliarosPotential said:
My only disappointment in the ruling is on p. 20: "An arbitrator's factual findings are generally not open to judicial challenge, and we accept the facts as the arbitrator found them." So methinks the NFL will likely argue that Brady got off on technicalities.
 
And the facts were that the balls were slightly under pressurized.  Due to whatever reasons.
 

loshjott

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2004
15,005
Silver Spring, MD
Shelterdog said:
Get out while you still can! 
 
Hot legal take: Wells really pissed off Berman. Wells had this whole bit at the hearing about how he wrote the report but Pash had some things to say, and well, since Pash is "Harvard-trained" you've got to listen.  Berman twice referenced this at a hearing, once a little sarcastically and once out-and-out saying that he didn't understand what Wells said about Pash's role, only that there was a non-enlightening remark about Pash being Harvard-trained.  That he repeated the Harvard-trained line about Pash in the decision is just rubbing salt in it--a federal judge in the SDNY doesn't give two fucks about someone who went to Harvard and he probably turns down 200 Harvard law grads a a year for clerkships.
 
And Berman got his J.D. from NYU (and a Master of Social Work from Fordham) so he's probably developed a healthy disdain for silver-spooned Harvard lawyers throughout his career. My hot take....
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
My only disappointment in the ruling is on p. 20: "An arbitrator's factual findings are generally not open to judicial challenge, and we accept the facts as the arbitrator found them." So methinks the NFL will likely argue that Brady got off on technicalities.
 
 
Much like the "cheatriots" meme, the NFL would say that anyway, no matter what the basis for the ruling, and their media handmaidens would repeat it, no matter what the reality.
 

bsj

Renegade Crazed Genius
SoSH Member
Dec 6, 2003
22,801
Central NJ SoSH Chapter
soxhop411 said:
“@BartHubbuch: Never forget: The Patriots accepted the penalties and suspended the two ballboys without pay.”

Is he a GG member?
 
who cares he's a crappy sports head who writes for the worst slimiest paper in the country. Leave him be and let's stop crapping up the celebration. 
 

leftfieldlegacy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2005
1,011
North Jersey
It seems like Judge Berman let Goodell walk into a bear trap when he testified to some sort of equivalence between the Brady suspension and a typical PED suspension. I think as soon as Goodell was finished with that testimony the trap snapped closed and Berman had the NFL on not following fair arbitration practices. That and not allowing access to Nash and lack of notice sealed the deal.
 
IANAL (obviously) but do these points make it more difficult to overturn this on appeal?
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,806
Melrose, MA
Is there a poison pill here for the NFL? Berman overruled on the notice argument (which precludes a new hearing) and on the NFL failure to allow Pash testimony and share investigative files with NFLPA (which could be remedied by sharing said files in advance of a new hearing).

On appeal, could court overrule Berman on notice and uphold him on process, thereby putting NFL in the position of having to disclose stuff it very much wants to keep hidden?
 

Koufax

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
5,946
The decision is great, but it dealt only a glancing blow to the question of whether there was really any hanky panky.  On p. 7, Berman notes that Exponent advised Wells that it couldn't definitively say whether there was tampering because it was relying on assumptions and uncertain information.  Berman put that text in boldface, but then didn't refer to it again.
 
Edit: typo
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,027
AZ
It seems like the lawyers who were advising Goodell didn't do a great job here -- or at least took calculated risks that really backfired.  The Pash problem was a trap they fell into.  Having Wells' partner appear at the hearing to cross-examine Brady, while the Covington lawyers made objections was unnecessary.  And the gamesmanship of jumping to SDNY simultaneously while releasing the decision probably wasn't lost on Berman.  I think when a party basically signals to a judge (or in this case a court) "we want you," they run the risk that the judge will bend over backwards to be fair.  Although, as Boggs' chicken dinner notes, it might not have mattered.
 

notfar

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 17, 2008
2,411
Even though he couldn't base the ruling on it, I was hoping the decision would have an addendum about the horseshit science as well. Once the four or five Patriot haters that can read actually read the ruling and tell the loudmouth dumbfucks that it was all just due to the NFL not following process, the Cossacks of the world will land on "Brady did it but the NFL fucked up the process so he got off on a technicality."
 
Koufax said:
The decision is great, but it dealt only a glancing blow to the question of whether there was really any hanky panky.  On p. 7, Berman notes that Exponent advised Wells that it couldn't definitively say whether there was tampering because it was relying on assumptions and uncertain information.  Berman put that text in boldface, but then didn't refer to it again.
 
Yeah, that would seem to go hand-in-hand with the bit on p. 20 I cited about deferring to the arbitrator re: the facts of the case. It's a shame Berman didn't - or more likely, couldn't - come straight out and say that he simply doesn't believe the case against Brady anyway, even if that seems to be a strong subtext of his decision.
 

OnWisc

Microcosmic
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2006
6,968
Chicago, IL
DennyDoyle'sBoil said:
Fantastic! Wish he'd ruled on evident partiality, but the reality is that Brady still has all those arguments available to fight off an NFL appeal. Berman called it just like he saw it at oral argument. Right down the line.

Just so fucking nice someone neutral finally looked at this.
I agree, but the finding that denial of access to the Weiss files was "fundamentally unfair" and "Brady was prejudiced as a result" is probably as close as he realistically could come. I'll take that wording.
 

ilol@u

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 2, 2009
4,248
Foxboro
RedOctober3829 said:
ESPN running the montage of all Boston sports teams winning titles then cutting to Brady running on the field..... 6 to midnight
Anyway there is a link to this? Sounds amazing.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
It seems like the lawyers who were advising Goodell didn't do a great job here -- or at least took calculated risks that really backfired.  The Pash problem was a trap they fell into.  Having Wells' partner appear at the hearing to cross-examine Brady, while the Covington lawyers made objections was unnecessary.  And the gamesmanship of jumping to SDNY simultaneously while releasing the decision probably wasn't lost on Berman.  I think when a party basically signals to a judge (or in this case a court) "we want you," they run the risk that the judge will bend over backwards to be fair.  Although, as Boggs' chicken dinner notes, it might not have mattered.
 
Although I don't agree that the forum-shopping had any effect, I would love to be a fly on the wall to see where the lawyers' recommendations and the clients' actions diverge. In-house lawyers for your client can be the litigator's biggest nemesis, given that they often have different goals.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,027
AZ
leftfieldlegacy said:
It seems like Judge Berman let Goodell walk into a bear trap when he testified to some sort of equivalence between the Brady suspension and a typical PED suspension. I think as soon as Goodell was finished with that testimony the trap snapped closed and Berman had the NFL on not following fair arbitration practices. That and not allowing access to Nash and lack of notice sealed the deal.
 
IANAL (obviously) but do these points make it more difficult to overturn this on appeal?
 
I'm not sure that there was any trap laying there.  From the opinion, and looking at the question in retrospect, I think Berman (who has to spend half his life, remember, sentencing kids to prison under mandatory terms for drug violations) was probably genuinely offended that the NFL would attempt to equate this kind of violation with steroids.  From this opinion, you can see that he really wasn't playing games or messing around at oral argument or being a contrarian, he was simply honestly and earnestly calling it like he saw it for the whole day.
 
On the appeal question, nothing that Berman has really done here is going to get too much deference in the court of appeals.  They are going to look at it anew and Kessler will have to convince another court all over again.  As appellate lawyers like to say -- it doesn't matter who wins first, but who wins last.  That's not entirely true here, because Brady gets to play and the NFL will be hard pressed to get a stay, but today is still a very good day.  Maybe they will win on appeal, but the bottom line is that the first neutral person to look at this decided they are utterly and completely full of shit, notwithstanding the exceptionally high standard for overcoming awards.
 

Zososoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 30, 2009
9,245
South of North
If someone could help me track down a gif of Brady looking for hi-fives with a stupid grin on his face (you all know the one) that would be great. Because it perfectly encapsulates what it's like to be Pats fan outside of NE right now.
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,432
Southwestern CT
DennyDoyle'sBoil said:
It seems like the lawyers who were advising Goodell didn't do a great job here -- or at least took calculated risks that really backfired.  The Pash problem was a trap they fell into.  Having Wells' partner appear at the hearing to cross-examine Brady, while the Covington lawyers made objections was unnecessary.  And the gamesmanship of jumping to SDNY simultaneously while releasing the decision probably wasn't lost on Berman.  I think when a party basically signals to a judge (or in this case a court) "we want you," they run the risk that the judge will bend over backwards to be fair.  Although, as Boggs' chicken dinner notes, it might not have mattered.
 
We don't know this.  It could very well be that Goodell took actions that were contrary to the legal advice he was given and caused the lawyers to defend the indefensible.
 
Or, it could be that the lawyers screwed up.  Regardless, it's all good.
 

OnWisc

Microcosmic
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2006
6,968
Chicago, IL
Hearing that Brady's only issue with the ruling is the suspension is vacated "effective immediately." He wanted it "effective Tuesday," so he'd have the long weekend to just chill.
 

crystalline

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 12, 2009
5,771
JP
Shelterdog said:
Get out while you still can! 
 
Hot legal take: Wells really pissed off Berman. Wells had this whole bit at the hearing about how he wrote the report but Pash had some things to say, and well, since Pash is "Harvard-trained" you've got to listen.  Berman twice referenced this at a hearing, once a little sarcastically and once out-and-out saying that he didn't understand what Wells said about Pash's role, only that there was a non-enlightening remark about Pash being Harvard-trained.  That he repeated the Harvard-trained line about Pash in the decision is just rubbing salt in it--a federal judge in the SDNY doesn't give two fucks about someone who went to Harvard and he probably turns down 200 Harvard law grads a a year for clerkships.
 
EDIT: He also quotes the Wells Harvard-trained lawyer statement.  To me the tone is "come the fuck on Ted we both know you allowed the NFL's GC to edit the ever living shit out of the report and you tailor made it to his directions, don't give me some F. Scott Fitzgerald bullshit about Ivy league men."
I just came here to post this- Berman described Pash as "Harvard-trained" in the order. That is a direct FU to Wells.



Also, Wells is a total idiot. Smart Harvard graduates actually restrain their ego. Moderately intelligent Harvard graduates think they really are very smart compared to everyone else, but they never tell anyone because they know it makes them look bad. And Harvard graduates that are complete idiots brag about it not only to others, but in a proceeding that has a written transcript.

I don't know anything about Wells' legal record. But based on his lies about independence, participation in a coached press conference, and bragging about Harvard, I have concluded he is a moron.