That was then: Celebrating what was

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,141
I think the team leaders conveying and exemplifying the BB philosophy in their own ways was instrumental - the coach alone isn’t gonna get it done, so the coach finding those messengers is just as important as the message itself. Brady, Vrabel, Harrison, McGinest, Hightower, Slater, Edelman, McCourty, Wilfork, Bruschi, Nink, and so on.
Fair point. Not really criticizing the method and more criticizing not doing whatever it took to keep TB12 until his arm fell off. BB was great at pivoting from strategies on the field. Might have wanted to do it off the field as well. In fairness, we’re also hearing only 1 side of the story and we’ll never know BB’s thoughts on this. Maybe TB12 was too sensitive.
 

BaseballJones

slappy happy
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
26,967
It’s also possible that Tom Brady was the glue holding it all together and not BB’s rigid style. Brady himself demanded a ton from teammates.
no doubt Brady was an enormous part of this both on and off the field. I guess my question is, if Belichick was always this brutally difficult to play for him everybody hated it, why the hell did so many players keep coming back for more under him? Answer: because they won like nobody else in the history of the league.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,141
no doubt Brady was an enormous part of this both on and off the field. I guess my question is, if Belichick was always this brutally difficult to play for him everybody hated it, why the hell did so many players keep coming back for more under him? Answer: because they won like nobody else in the history of the league.
Yup. We all watched Pete Carroll’s style ruin a SB team so zero complaints about how BB ran the operation. But he probably should have given a little towards the end, if he didn’t, to keep TB12 happy. But maybe it was too late anyways. In any event, now that we are GOAT-less, I’m good with a new style.
 

Jo_Co

New Member
Feb 27, 2021
16
no doubt Brady was an enormous part of this both on and off the field. I guess my question is, if Belichick was always this brutally difficult to play for him everybody hated it, why the hell did so many players keep coming back for more under him? Answer: because they won like nobody else in the history of the league.
It’ll always be a bit of chicken or the egg. But clearly once Tom left, the winning ceased. Like Amendola says in one of these trailers “We worked for Bill, but we played for Tom.”
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
3,347
Is this show just going to be depressing, Bill bashing? Not what we needed Apple! The guy already lost a job to Raheem Morris. Let's let the body cool first.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
20,257
Also helps to explain the struggles of BB assistants who get HC opportunities. When success is not immediate, the approach wears thin quickly.
Obligatory reminder that Saban did well (wasn't his fault the Dolphins signed Culpepper), Daboll got a Daniel Jones team to win a playoff game, and Flores was undermined by his GM and owner the minute he arrived in Miami.

I'll be interested to hear the whole story rather than the snippets from the trailers and press versions. It's probably going to be a lot more nuanced than "Bill is mean old baddie" and "the players hate their coach" and "no fun (lol)".
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
48,642
Here
It’ll always be a bit of chicken or the egg. But clearly once Tom left, the winning ceased. Like Amendola says in one of these trailers “We worked for Bill, but we played for Tom.”
These are worthless platitudes. Bill created the roster and helped coach all elements of the game, including those over which Brady had absolutely no control. Also, they were there to work, so I don’t even take that as an insult. I think many of the players will acknowledge that he was a giant pain in the ass, but also made them better at their job and more likely to win. I don’t think this went over Bill’s head btw, I think he purposefully had leaders who could ease the pain with teammates and I also don’t dismiss the possibility that Bill might have thought having him as the bad guy might have brought the team closer together.
Obligatory reminder that Saban did well (wasn't his fault the Dolphins signed Culpepper), Daboll got a Daniel Jones team to win a playoff game, and Flores was undermined by his GM and owner the minute he arrived in Miami.

I'll be interested to hear the whole story rather than the snippets from the trailers and press versions. It's probably going to be a lot more nuanced than "Bill is mean old baddie" and "the players hate their coach" and "no fun (lol)".
Yeah, I have a hard time believing Matthew Slater is going to take time out of his day to endlessly shit on BB, especially considering he was still playing for him at the time.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
20,257
These are worthless platitudes. Bill created the roster and helped coach all elements of the game, including those over which Brady had absolutely no control. Also, they were there to work, so I don’t even take that as an insult. I think many of the players will acknowledge that he was a giant pain in the ass, but also made them better at their job and more likely to win. I don’t think this went over Bill’s head btw, I think he purposefully had leaders who could ease the pain with teammates and I also don’t dismiss the possibility that Bill might have thought having him as the bad guy might have brought the team closer together.
I do recall players praising Bill's hard ass preseason workouts after the comeback from 28-3. I do recall Jason McCourty saying he had a lot more fun winning a Super Bowl than playing for a team that went 0-16 the prior season.

The reality is that making a coach/player relationship work for 20 years is hard; the fact that it ended in friction is not unprecedented. Maybe Bill could have been a bit more accommodating towards Brady. At the same time, Fuck Alex Guerrero.
 

AlNipper49

Huge Member
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 3, 2001
45,754
Mtigawi
I don’t get why it’s such a big deal. I’ve worked with and for people that I’ve really liked and respected. Sometimes at some point you just want to or need to shake things up a bit.

Some of you are perpetuating WEEI talking points. If Brady didn’t like playing with Belichick, then as the best QB in his league he could have dictated where he went. He didn’t. Further, it was usually for below market deals.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
48,642
Here
Did I suggest otherwise? You missed the point, I think.
You didn't really make a point other than seemingly Bill drove Tom away and ruined everything, did you? My counterpoint is that there very likely would have been far less to ruin had BB not coached the way he did. Also, Brady was here for 20 years, so is it really fair to say he drove Brady away? He stayed for 20 years and 9 Superbowls, and BB got him to stay at a reduced contract rate. Of course Brady himself gets credit for that, but I have to think at some point Tom Brady made these decisions because he saw the benefits of having Bill Belichick as his coach.

We also don't even have any context here, just what the media is drumming up, because that's what they do. For all we know, Tom was pissed about BB telling him to keep that quack Guerrero (who Brady has now thrown to the curb) away from his facilities. Additionally, while he won't say it and I'm sure will frame things in the way most beneficial to him now, do we really think Tom Brady didn't factor in that the roster was turning over and he was 42 into his decision? If the 2021 roster looked like the 2014 roster, I have a feeling Tom might have found it within himself to have stayed.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,141
You didn't really make a point other than seemingly Bill drove Tom away and ruined everything, did you? My counterpoint is that there very likely would have been far less to ruin had BB not coached the way he did. Also, Brady was here for 20 years, so is it really fair to say he drove Brady away? He stayed for 20 years and 9 Superbowls, and BB got him to stay at a reduced contract rate. Of course Brady himself gets credit for that, but I have to think at some point Tom Brady made these decisions because he saw the benefits of having Bill Belichick as his coach.

We also don't even have any context here, just what the media is drumming up, because that's what they do. For all we know, Tom was pissed about BB telling him to keep that quack Guerrero (who Brady has now thrown to the curb) away from his facilities. Additionally, while he won't say it and I'm sure will frame things in the way most beneficial to him now, do we really think Tom Brady didn't factor in that the roster was turning over and he was 42 into his decision? If the 2021 roster looked like the 2014 roster, I have a feeling Tom might have found it within himself to have stayed.
I clarified my point in subsequent posts.- my original point was an admitted driveby. For all we know, BB the GM made a poor evaluation and that’s what drove all this. But none of us will truly know the dynamic.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
11,971
It also makes sense that once the record breaking winning stopped, the whole thing quickly went downhill.
Bingo.

I posted something similar and got push back but I can't imagine it's fun to be in a work environment like that when you aren't seeing results.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
11,971
We also don't even have any context here, just what the media is drumming up, because that's what they do. For all we know, Tom was pissed about BB telling him to keep that quack Guerrero (who Brady has now thrown to the curb) away from his facilities.
When did Brady throw Guerrero to the curb? I thought they were still friends and business partners?

EDIT: And to reply to your post where you mentioned Slater not shitting on BB, there is a direct quote from Slater saying "It was brutal" to play for Belichick
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
11,971
I doubt that other NFL teams turn practice into playtime either.
Yeah...I don't think I ever suggested that or think that happens, but ok?

From everything we've heard about Belichick he's a demanding dictator. Players put up with that when there's results. I think it's much tougher to deal with when things on the field are going badly
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,888
When did Brady throw Guerrero to the curb? I thought they were still friends and business partners?

EDIT: And to reply to your post where you mentioned Slater not shitting on BB, there is a direct quote from Slater saying "It was brutal" to play for Belichick
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/tom-brady-alex-guerrero-dissolve-business-partnership-as-tb12-store-in-foxborough-shuts-down-per-report/
The business has been shut down, but they are apparently still friends.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
48,642
Here
EDIT: And to reply to your post where you mentioned Slater not shitting on BB, there is a direct quote from Slater saying "It was brutal" to play for Belichick
I'm aware of that. My point, as Lex was saying above, is I highly doubt that the full story of what Matthew Slater is going to tell about BB reflects in that single quote. I'm not doubting that playing for BB was difficult, but I am certainly doubting that Slater's appearances on this documentary, unless selectively edited, will reflect an overall negative outlook towards BB. Matthew Slater made the choice to re-sign here a billion times, including after Tom left.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
24,330
Pittsburgh, PA
A pretty consistent theme from a lot of former players is that BB’s holding Brady just as accountable for errors/mistakes as practice squad players was instrumental in getting them to buy into BB’s approach. But I’m also not surprised that at some point that Brady wanted something different.
Agreed, I don't think looking at both the upside and downside of Belichick's approach is somehow trashing Bill or the organization. "it grew old and wore thin on Brady that he could never get Belichick's unqualified approval" is a theme with a lot of echoes throughout sports and, like, human relationships and history. That they made it all work for 20 years together is the remarkable thing, not that it eventually ended in something other than a Hollywood "lived happily ever after" fashion.
 

Silverdude2167

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 9, 2006
5,121
Amstredam
Yeah...I don't think I ever suggested that or think that happens, but ok?

From everything we've heard about Belichick he's a demanding dictator. Players put up with that when there's results. I think it's much tougher to deal with when things on the field are going badly
I mean the team the team played hard till the end of this season.

There really are not any examples of the coaching style not working, unless we think Mac Jones is an example of something.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
3,347
Agreed, I don't think looking at both the upside and downside of Belichick's approach is somehow trashing Bill or the organization. "it grew old and wore thin on Brady that he could never get Belichick's unqualified approval" is a theme with a lot of echoes throughout sports and, like, human relationships and history. That they made it all work for 20 years together is the remarkable thing, not that it eventually ended in something other than a Hollywood "lived happily ever after" fashion.
They certainly could have cracked around 2009-2010 with everything that was going on with the team at that point. That was basically their low point in terms of performance overall. I wonder if the Scottish Game had gone differently they actually might have separated then.

I'll be interested to see if this series follows a kind of timeline or jumps around based on different themes/topics. And hopefully the BB/TB dynamic doesn't overwhelm the whole story but fits as a major, but not exclusive, part of a 20-year arc.
 

jcd0805

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 3, 2007
4,150
Florida
I mean, Jabrill Peppers was quoted after the Steelers win saying how good it felt to get a win for Bill and the coaches because they were drawing up good game plans all season but the players weren't executing, sure doesn't sound like a guy who was dreading coming to work every day. The "Brady was like an abused dog" quote I mean come on. I'm sure some players hated Bill (especially ones like Welker who Bill had clearly soured on) but I'm sure there were a bunch who liked being pushed to be their best. And I keep thinking of the video of Bill in training camp commenting on Mayo not spending his money and then being told he had 3 trucks and joking with him, "who needs 3 trucks?" It was light hearted and I know I've seen a bunch more of those moments throughout the last 20 years. If this is a bash Bill fest for 6 episodes it's going to really bum me out :(
 

SemperFidelisSox

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2008
34,010
Boston, MA
It may not have been fun at times, but they won more than anyone else in the history of the sport. Which, as I understand it, was/is the goal. Other teams win big for short periods of time but it’s possible that BB’s style was the only way to hold the whole thing together as long as it lasted. Of course there’s a price to pay for all that success. It’s not easy, and quite often not enjoyable.
In one of those Football Life specials on Bill Walsh, he talked about how he had very little contact with most of his former players. Walsh acknowledged that he was mainly to blame for that because the job required sacrificing personal relationships.
 

BaseballJones

slappy happy
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
26,967
I'm aware of that. My point, as Lex was saying above, is I highly doubt that the full story of what Matthew Slater is going to tell about BB reflects in that single quote. I'm not doubting that playing for BB was difficult, but I am certainly doubting that Slater's appearances on this documentary, unless selectively edited, will reflect an overall negative outlook towards BB. Matthew Slater made the choice to re-sign here a billion times, including after Tom left.
And unless Slater was totally BSing me, I can tell you he holds BB in the highest regard. It still may have been so demanding that at times it was brutal, but then Slater did keep coming back for more, because he knew this was the way.
 

MuppetAsteriskTalk

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2015
5,496
Judon seems to be very happy to play for Bill. Has said lots of nice things about playing for the Pats and doing things right, even though they have mostly sucked since he's been here.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
11,971
I mean, Jabrill Peppers was quoted after the Steelers win saying how good it felt to get a win for Bill and the coaches because they were drawing up good game plans all season but the players weren't executing, sure doesn't sound like a guy who was dreading coming to work every day. The "Brady was like an abused dog" quote I mean come on. I'm sure some players hated Bill (especially ones like Welker who Bill had clearly soured on) but I'm sure there were a bunch who liked being pushed to be their best. And I keep thinking of the video of Bill in training camp commenting on Mayo not spending his money and then being told he had 3 trucks and joking with him, "who needs 3 trucks?" It was light hearted and I know I've seen a bunch more of those moments throughout the last 20 years. If this is a bash Bill fest for 6 episodes it's going to really bum me out :(
My guess is that it's a pretty even split of players who appreciate that style and players who find it really grating. I also think that some of these quotes are referring to the fact that Brady played for Bill for 20 years. I imagine that the level of critique and demands can become tiring.
 

jcd0805

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 3, 2007
4,150
Florida

The Social Chair

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 17, 2010
6,595
The Chiefs success does kind of make Belichick's approach seem a bit over the top in hindsight. The Pats probably would have been great every year because Brady was an insanely competitive leader and Bill was a great coach. The other stuff... I'm not sure that it mattered that much.
 

BaseballJones

slappy happy
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
26,967
My heart hurts reading both those sentences. Man it was a fabulous run!! I hate it had to end badly!!
Unless BB retired after winning a championship (or close), it was always going to be a situation where people were unhappy, and the press, of course, eats that stuff up. Especially the press who were not treated very well by Belichick and who have been waiting for decades to give him his comeuppance.

In any business or organization - ANY - if things are going poorly, there will be much to criticize and many people will be very unhappy and will have complaints. Legit ones, too. None of this should be surprising to any of us. Like, at all.
 

Jo_Co

New Member
Feb 27, 2021
16
The Chiefs success does kind of make Belichick's approach seem a bit over the top in hindsight. The Pats probably would have been great every year because Brady was an insanely competitive leader and Bill was a great coach. The other stuff... I'm not sure that it mattered that much.
Great point.

I’m sure it was probably brought up in the SB game thread, but it’s interesting to wonder what would have happened or how Bill would’ve reacted to an outburst from Gronk similar to how Kelce behaved during that confrontation with Reid. Hard not imagining Bill cutting off his nose to spite his face in that scenario.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
20,257
The Chiefs success does kind of make Belichick's approach seem a bit over the top in hindsight. The Pats probably would have been great every year because Brady was an insanely competitive leader and Bill was a great coach. The other stuff... I'm not sure that it mattered that much.
The only thing is that people tend to be a package. Bill is a package: his tactical brilliance is unquestionable. His overall approach to a season in terms of keeping a team focused deserves to be applauded. He's known as an outstanding teacher, especially on defense. Along with that comes a distant personality, which is necessary as he was also the one buying the groceries. And he had a reputation of being difficult to play for. But the overwhelming majority of his ex-players still have high praise for him.

I don't think it's possible to separate out different parts of an individual's personality and say "if only Bill were more like Andy Reid, then they would have done just as well...". People are complicated.

The "other stuff" may not have mattered, but it was an inseparable part of the package. And "the other stuff" was praised by the players when they came back and beat the Falcons, where conditioning was cited as an area where the Pats players seemed to have an edge at the end of the game.
 

Silverdude2167

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 9, 2006
5,121
Amstredam
The Chiefs success does kind of make Belichick's approach seem a bit over the top in hindsight. The Pats probably would have been great every year because Brady was an insanely competitive leader and Bill was a great coach. The other stuff... I'm not sure that it mattered that much.
The Chiefs have another what 10 to 15 years to replicate what the Pats do, maybe a bit early to question BB's approach.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
63,695
New York City
The Chiefs have another what 10 to 15 years to replicate what the Pats do, maybe a bit early to question BB's approach.
If KC has Mahomes, they will be competitive. For the 20 years Brady was with the Pats, they were competitive every year. Then they didn't have Brady and were marginally competitive, at best.

The QB is more important. That's why the Texans made the playoffs and Carolina was terrible.

Especially if that QB is an all time great and also insanely competitive, like Brady and Mahomes are.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,188
Hingham, MA
It feels like the Chiefs have been awesome forever, but this was only year 6. Mahomes and Brady have the same amount of rings through that time. So much is going to change for the Chiefs over the coming years, and the question will be whether they can reinvent themselves multiple times to stay not just competitive, but championship-level.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
20,257
San Francisco had the 3rd highest scoring offense this season going into the Super Bowl, and were held to 19 points in regulation. So, defense still matters. The Pats "struggles" in their drought era were almost always related to their defense being subpar. And their second dynasty was fueled in part by their obtaining Hightower, Collins, Jones, Butler, et al.

So, the challenge for the Chiefs will be the same as it was for the Pats: how to keep finding good players on defense, as well as supporting players on offense, through the inevitable roster turnover. Their roster seems in good shape with a lot of good young players on D. But the same could have been said for the Pats in 2004, and it still took them 10 years to win a Lombardi. Winning Super Bowls is hard.
 

jsinger121

@jsinger121
SoSH Member
Jul 25, 2005
18,127
It feels like the Chiefs have been awesome forever, but this was only year 6. Mahomes and Brady have the same amount of rings through that time. So much is going to change for the Chiefs over the coming years, and the question will be whether they can reinvent themselves multiple times to stay not just competitive, but championship-level.
They have good since 2013 starting with Alex Smith with records of 11-5 (WC Loss), 9-7 (missed playoffs), 11-5 (loss Divisional), 12-4 (lost WC), 10-6 (lost WC). Insert Mahomes in 2018 and the Chiefs have elevated into a super power.
 

Manuel Aristides

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 7, 2009
266
The Chiefs success does kind of make Belichick's approach seem a bit over the top in hindsight. The Pats probably would have been great every year because Brady was an insanely competitive leader and Bill was a great coach. The other stuff... I'm not sure that it mattered that much.
Eh, I'm not sure I agree. I take your point; there are a million ways to run a team and certainly there are some highly successful ones that don't include BB's infamous joylessness. And sure, perhaps if you just subtract the joylessness out, it would have run the same. But also, perhaps not. Kind of a big assumption. Just because Reid and Mahomes can make it work that way does not mean that it would have worked here. Perhaps BB's forever-criticism inspired TB to max out his body in a way that wouldn't have otherwise happened, or his brutal conditioning may have been the only thing that allowed a player to make a key late-game-winning play. We simply don't know. But just because some people can win "the Chiefs way" as it were, doesn't mean that it will work for anyone or that specific parts of "the Patriot way" not present in the chiefs way were unnecessary.

I agree that we don't know how much it mattered. But I don't think that means we should assume it didn't.
 

wonderland

New Member
Jul 20, 2005
590
The Chiefs success does kind of make Belichick's approach seem a bit over the top in hindsight. The Pats probably would have been great every year because Brady was an insanely competitive leader and Bill was a great coach. The other stuff... I'm not sure that it mattered that much.
I’d bet Reid approac is a lot closer to Belichick’s than say McDaniel wanting to be invited to hang out with his players.

Ultimately, you have to have buy in at the top of the player food chain. Brady and other key Pats did that. Mahomes is doing that with Reid. I get Brady having enough but he also need the team would be in for a rebuild and having limited time left. But I fully believe Brady doesn’t become the player he did with Belichick. For a long time, Belichick pushed the right buttons to push Brady higher. In the end, he ran out of buttons so Brady took all the lessons he learned and went Tampa.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,188
Hingham, MA
Yeah, perhaps Belichick's approach pushed Brady that much extra to "prove him wrong", until he just had enough of it. Would I have liked for the Pats to be a bit more "fun" for those 20 years? Sure. But I wouldn't want to go back and try it a different way.
 

BaseballJones

slappy happy
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
26,967
First 6 seasons (as a starter, so no 2000 for Brady or 2017 for Mahomes):

Mahomes: 66.5%, 28,140 yds, 7.9 y/a, 219 td, 62 int, 103.7 rating, 3 SB titles, 5 AFCCG, 2 MVP, 3 SB MVP, 3x top 5 MVP
Brady: 61.9%, 21,558 yds, 7.0 y/a, 147 td, 78 int, 88.4 rating, 3 SB titles, 4 AFCCG, 0 MVP, 2 SB MVP, 2x top 5 MVP

So ok, great start for Mahomes - even better than Brady, even adjusting for the era in which they played.

But then Brady hit another gear entirely.

Next 10 seasons for Brady (technically 11, but 2008 he missed after getting injured in the first Q of the first game):

65.0%, 44,595 yds, 7.8 y/a, 341 td, 82 int, 102.5 rating, 2 SB titles, 8 AFCCG, 3 MVP, 2 SB MVP, 7x top 5 MVP

And then after that, he only did this to close out his career - last 5 seasons (ages 41-45, mind you):

65.5%, 23,055 yds, 7.1 y/a, 161 td, 52 int, 96.1 rating, 2 SB titles, 2 conf championship games, 1 SB MVP, 1x top 5 MVP

So I want to see if Mahomes can reach a new gear like Brady did. I want to see if Mahomes' next 10 seasons can be what Brady's next 10 seasons were following these opening six as a starter.
 

BaseballJones

slappy happy
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
26,967
Yeah, perhaps Belichick's approach pushed Brady that much extra to "prove him wrong", until he just had enough of it. Would I have liked for the Pats to be a bit more "fun" for those 20 years? Sure. But I wouldn't want to go back and try it a different way.
Of course, neither you nor I were in the building and had to deal with whatever work conditions were present at Patriot Place. All I know is:

1. Belichick was the head coach during the greatest 20 year run in NFL history,
2. Tons of players kept coming back for more, including Tom Brady,
3. Whatever else *may* have happened if BB had a different coaching style, we know what *did* happen, which was 17 division titles, 13 trips to the AFCCG, 9 trips to the Super Bowl, and 6 Lombardis.

Nobody else in the history of the sport even came close to accomplishing this. That's not playing "what if" like so many are doing in light of the end here. That's playing *what DID*. So I'm with you. I wouldn't want to go back and try it a different way. It was absolutely glorious and the greatest run of all time.

I'll happily take that.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
3,347
Eh, I'm not sure I agree. I take your point; there are a million ways to run a team and certainly there are some highly successful ones that don't include BB's infamous joylessness. And sure, perhaps if you just subtract the joylessness out, it would have run the same. But also, perhaps not. Kind of a big assumption. Just because Reid and Mahomes can make it work that way does not mean that it would have worked here. Perhaps BB's forever-criticism inspired TB to max out his body in a way that wouldn't have otherwise happened, or his brutal conditioning may have been the only thing that allowed a player to make a key late-game-winning play. We simply don't know. But just because some people can win "the Chiefs way" as it were, doesn't mean that it will work for anyone or that specific parts of "the Patriot way" not present in the chiefs way were unnecessary.

I agree that we don't know how much it mattered. But I don't think that means we should assume it didn't.
What interests me is Kraft's role in this too. How much did he apprehend what was happening? Why did he choose BB (who even then was in his late 60s) over TB in 2020? The runway for both was short. He's always seemed to tolerate BB personally, while obviously respecting him and benefiting greatly from his efforts, but I think he'd always choose the guy who was more like a son than the guy who he struggled to connect with on a personal level. I know there were some comments recently that suggested regret over the decision but they were still vague.

Reid looks like he's running a great ship right now but time will tell how they all ends. Aside from the Kelce thing, which is pretty innocent, that team has had its own string of bad actors and incidents, including involving his own family. If he was smart he might give it another year or two and transition to TV where I think he'd really shine. Take the Cowher-type exit.
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,888
It feels like the Chiefs have been awesome forever, but this was only year 6. Mahomes and Brady have the same amount of rings through that time. So much is going to change for the Chiefs over the coming years, and the question will be whether they can reinvent themselves multiple times to stay not just competitive, but championship-level.
The move to a 17 game schedule and the adjustments to the playoff format will also make it more difficult over time. It's much harder for a team to avoid catastrophic injury when you are potentially playing up to 21 competitive games. Although I'm sure we'll get two more playoff teams eventually and go back to the top 2 seeds getting a bye.

The AFC is going to be very tough over the next 5-7 years. Jackson, Burrow and Allen are only 27. Tua and Herbert are only 25. If Stroud and Lawrence continue to improve, that's nearly half the conference with quality starting QBs and that's before you get to guys like Rodgers, Wilson and Watson who could return to form. If Harbaugh and Payton are able to turn the Chargers and Broncos around, then even the division won't be a gimmie anymore.