Week 7: The Game Thread

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 22, 2008
36,123
Really makes you appreciate how TB12 would turtle and protect himself and the ball in situations like that one.

Maybe Hurts could’ve tucked the ball and either stiff-armed the blitzer or tried to make him miss, but attempting a throw there was a blunder.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,907
Sirriani looks like he is dying on the sideline how is no one on the broadcast mentioning this. Dude looks like he hasn’t slept in a month.
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
47,076
Hartford, CT
Does Mostert run correct routes downfield? He seems to routinely be on top of other receivers, and that can’t be the design. Do they think he’s James White?
 

OCST

Sunny von Bulow
SoSH Member
Jan 10, 2004
24,570
The 718
Absolutely. The traditional Vikings unis are perfection, but Nike had to go and mess them up.

I walked 20+ miles through Philly this morning, and I couldn't go more than a block without running into someone sporting a kelly green retro jersey. (Mostly Hurts, but also a number of Reggie White ones.) These are the Eagles best unis, although I prefer the white jersey version.po

One thing missing from the Buddy Ryan era---they all wore black cleats with these unis back then.
I was a Vikings fan as a kid, because a) they played in a foot of snow b) they had kick ass uniforms c) they had Fran Tarkenton, who ran around when no one else did and it was really fun, and Page and Marshall and all that d) they played in a foot of snow e) they had kick ass uniforms.

Obviously the roster was going to turn over at some point, but when they moved inside and adopted the high-gloss, nail-polish-colors uniforms, I just fell out of love. I've been really without a team ever since... I was never a Patriots fan in the 70's so it felt dirty to bandwagon in the Parcells/Brady era. I've been flirting with the Jets - I live in New York but as a native New Englander I am constitutionally incapable of rooting for any of the old-line New York franchises (Yankees, Giants, Knicks, Rangers) but as an Everton fan there's only so much I can subject myself to karmic abuse.
 

OCST

Sunny von Bulow
SoSH Member
Jan 10, 2004
24,570
The 718
This is a very entertaining game. MOstly well played, with some crucial mistakes, they only add to the drama and fun.
 

heavyde050

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2006
11,257
San Francisco
I am still not sold on this Philly team being as good as last year. That is mostly because of the rate that Hurts is turning it over. But they are definitely beating the Phins, just winning at the line of scrimmage.
 

Gash Prex

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 18, 2002
6,870
Be fun for the Pats to beat the Dolphins after this prime time beat down…make for some fun stories out of Miami
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,091
New York City
"A series of egregious calls" and he links one? And I bet the call he links is graded by the NFL as 100% correct. The NFL tells their officials to be "extremely liberal" with the definition of catchable. If there is any chance that any player could get even a finger on the ball if they were uncontacted, whether inbounds or out of bounds, it's catchable. If you aren't sure, it's catchable. If it doesn't land in the stands, it's catchable. The NFL wants to err on the side of punishing the defense who potentially makes illegal contact. "If in doubt, foul. Stopping touching the receivers".

So really on this play you are just judging the severity of the contact. It certainly wouldn't be enough in the college game, but the NFL doesn't want their receivers touched. Period.
The ball was literally uncatchable. There was no chance to get a fingertip on it.

So the NFL should change the rule. Because what you're saying is the NFL is actively telling the refs not to follow the rule book. So either you're Baghdad Bob or the NFL needs to change this rule, because what is the point of a rule if it's not going to be followed and, instead, it goes on vibes?
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 22, 2008
36,123
To their credit, they have demolished the worst teams in the NFL, which is a skill in itself. But when they play a team with any kind of talent, they lose.

In summary, they are frauds.
Is there any evidence that winning more than your share of games against top teams is a good predictor of playoff success? I thought W-L record and point differential were both better predictors. Which means there’s a lot to be said for consistently pummeling shitty teams. (Which the Bills failed to do yesterday, incidentally.)
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,680
Hingham, MA
Is there any evidence that winning more than your share of games against top teams is a good predictor of playoff success? I thought W-L record and point differential were both better predictors. Which means there’s a lot to be said for consistently pummeling shitty teams. (Which the Bills failed to do yesterday, incidentally.)
There is probably not any evidence, because the NFL playoffs are such SSS. The 2010 Pats demolished all the playoff teams they played... then lost in the first round. The 2018 Pats lost to a bunch of crappy teams... and won it all.
 

CFB_Rules

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2016
1,636
The ball was literally uncatchable. There was no chance to get a fingertip on it.

So the NFL should change the rule. Because what you're saying is the NFL is actively telling the refs not to follow the rule book. So either you're Baghdad Bob or the NFL needs to change this rule, because what is the point of a rule if it's not going to be followed and, instead, it goes on vibes?
The benefit of any doubt goes to the offense. If there is a non-zero chance that anyone on Earth could have made a play on the ball if completely untouched, it's catchable. If Usain Bolt could have gotten there, it's catchable. And it doesn't have to be catchable in bounds, because players are allowed by rule to bat or throw the ball back into the field of play where a teammate can catch it. The ball lands at the limit line, so it's four yards out of bounds. Can an NFL player completely untouched jump four yards? Probably! Remember the standard: Non-zero chance anyone on Earth could get there if untouched. Any doubt goes to the offense, because they're not the ones who made illegal contact.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,091
New York City
Is there any evidence that winning more than your share of games against top teams is a good predictor of playoff success? I thought W-L record and point differential were both better predictors. Which means there’s a lot to be said for consistently pummeling shitty teams. (Which the Bills failed to do yesterday, incidentally.)
Pummeling shitty teams will add to the differential.

I can't imagine that crushing teams is a negative. But the Dolphins are definitely a front running operation, in that they have beaten the worst teams in the NFL (literally, not hyperbole) but have been beaten by the good teams they have played. It's hard to judge their performance this year. Better than most, at least.